P
Re: ISO 9000 for Education Institutions
Thank you Dr Madhvan for raising this It is the question (even Marc opined ) people shirk to deliberate upon.
In India AICTE ( all India council of Science and technology), and ABET in USA etc are trying to reinforce Quality Assurance in (technical) education; but with what success?
Similar is the endeavour made by ISO 9000 series accreditation service.
On ther other side how far is the generic Intenational Quality Management System satandard potent in assuraing Quality of education?
Infact there is lot of subjectivity in assessment process, in competency (alleniation) of auditors and the technical experts (if any, ). Another moot question for latter is that are they really convinced of their roleas quality assessors? A level of competency, professionalism and Quality training is what is solicited for both the parties, at different places, so that it closely serves the needs.
The modusoperandi needs to be honed.
p thareja
dr madhavan said:
My further questions:
1. Any institution when started undergoes rigorous inspection and verification by competent authorities before permission is given to run the Institution. If that be the case, what additional help is expected to be derived out of a ISO 900X:1994 / 2000 system?
Thanks
1. Any institution when started undergoes rigorous inspection and verification by competent authorities before permission is given to run the Institution. If that be the case, what additional help is expected to be derived out of a ISO 900X:1994 / 2000 system?
Thanks
In India AICTE ( all India council of Science and technology), and ABET in USA etc are trying to reinforce Quality Assurance in (technical) education; but with what success?
Similar is the endeavour made by ISO 9000 series accreditation service.
On ther other side how far is the generic Intenational Quality Management System satandard potent in assuraing Quality of education?
Infact there is lot of subjectivity in assessment process, in competency (alleniation) of auditors and the technical experts (if any, ). Another moot question for latter is that are they really convinced of their roleas quality assessors? A level of competency, professionalism and Quality training is what is solicited for both the parties, at different places, so that it closely serves the needs.
The modusoperandi needs to be honed.
p thareja