Sidney Vianna said:
This might seem trivial to some, but when you have a written statement from a representative from one of the leading accreditation agencies in the world promising that appropriate actions would be taken and, eight months later, you still have a website displaying a certificate, bearing their logo, indicating conformance to non existing standards, it seems to be indicative of the sad state of affairs we are in.
Sidney, from your posts it is clear to me you are among the few in the registration business who do care about the level of service, integrity and ethical conduct that should underpin the registration/ accreditation industry. For that you must be applauded. And, I think you are almost a voice in the wilderness. And that is a situation with which I am personally very familiar.
If, though, the accreditation/ registration business is in a sad state of affairs, it is of its own making. As I have stated in another post elsewhere, you have the wrong people leading that whole thing and in the wrong way.
As I recently sated to Randy, during our enjoyable Dearborn meeting, I have a high regard for DNV for its avant garde position over quality assurance that predates other large registrars by years. As I know only too well myself, we can be cursed by association with those who care not.
But, as you will no doubt realise, DNV must fight the battle that matters and that silly web site or an outdated/ wrong logo on trucks is not the fight that matters.