I find it a source of some amusement that training people to conduct audits is looked upon as 'enduring the training' and that it is done to 'get a piece of paper'.
If you recruited a new person into your business you would most likely train them to do the job you required of them. Why then is it OK to just let people go out and audit without training them?
I am the first to agree that being trained and having a piece of paper does not automatically mean that you have a good auditor but they stand a better chance of being a good auditor than one who doesn't have the training.
Perhaps more careful selection of the trainer/training organisation would be a good place to start.
If you recruited a new person into your business you would most likely train them to do the job you required of them. Why then is it OK to just let people go out and audit without training them?
I am the first to agree that being trained and having a piece of paper does not automatically mean that you have a good auditor but they stand a better chance of being a good auditor than one who doesn't have the training.
Perhaps more careful selection of the trainer/training organisation would be a good place to start.
