ISO Confusion - Do we comply and other questions

Q

Q rex

#1
I'm going to use the terminology of 9k-'94, because I am a lot more familiar with it, apologies.

My company is basically in the information field. Our product is information, used by our customer to build or retrofit a facility, make a decision, purchase equipment or material.

Our business is "design". Our product is "design documents". We have a business process approach in place that served to migrate from our TQM program to ISO 9001 certification.

In my opinion, we have many of the requirements of the standard for, e.g., design, applied to our product, because it is "design". Similarly, we seem to have crosslinked the definitions of document, record, and product, and applied all of the requirements of the standard for each of these to all of them in our QMS documentation.

We have a documentation matrix that 0points to where we appear to have pasted someone's idea of key phrases from the standard into sometimes unrelated sections of our business procedures.

We map control of nonconforming product into our Corrective Action procedure, which in practice looks at projects during audit, when nonconforming product, if it existed, is already in the client's hands.

We have a procedure for calibration, even though the scope of this procedure in no way relates to instruments that measure the quality of our product.

Following the thoughts of The Audit Guy, nonconforming product only exists when tested or inspected and found to fail. In the case of an intangible product such as information, there isn't a warehouse of off-spec widgets to be concerned about. When defects in information become known, the information includes the correction.

The model the '94 standard embodies does not seem all that well suited to an iterative endeavor, such as "design". Preliminary information is developed, review with client elucidates many of the client's requirements that he/she was unable to communicate without benefit of the preliminary information developed. The linear, unbranched, uniterated model of the standard is difficult to impose on the iterative processes of design. Lack of understanding of how to go about this produces a cobbled together QMS that gets ignored by users, like VCR manuals that appear to have been translated from Japanese into Finnish, Finnish to Swahili, Swahili into English.

I'd like to hear the thoughts of the
Forum on this. Thanks.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#2
->The model the '94 standard embodies does not seem all that
->well suited to an iterative endeavor, such as "design".
->Preliminary information is developed, review with client
->elucidates many of the client's requirements that he/she
->was unable to communicate without benefit of the
->preliminary information developed. The linear, unbranched,
->uniterated model of the standard is difficult to impose on
->the iterative processes of design. Lack of understanding
->of how to go about this produces a cobbled together QMS
->that gets ignored by users, like VCR manuals that appear
->to have been translated from Japanese into Finnish,
->Finnish to Swahili,

Well, you have me. Design is iterative. That is to say designs are changed from time to time. Some are changed quite frequently. In the actual process, there are many times where the process 'loops back upon its self'. A good example is where you validate your design. The validation may fail which causes you to loop back and try again. Where in the design process it loops back to depends upon the failure mode and the root cause.

ISO 9001:1994 is not linear per se. Nor is the 2000 version. I think you better break down what you are trying to say in simplier terms.

In my implementation guide I stress that each everything a company does is interactive. You talk about a 'cobbled together QMS'. How so? You should be able to put together a high level flow chart which outlines top level interactions. In the same vein, you can do the same to the sub-processes.

Take a look through the slides from about http://Elsmar.com/Imp/sld025.htm

If you can be a bit more specific with less complex verbiage maybe I can better comment.

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 20 April 2001).]
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Risk Analysis Flow - Confusion between ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 8
M IAS (USA) Accreditation with IAF for ISO 13485 Logo Confusion EU Medical Device Regulations 10
M Accept/Reject (Ac/Re) Numbers (ISO 2859-1) Confusion Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A Informational Confusion about Risks for Processes in ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 44
SteveK EN ISO 13485:2012 vs. ISO 13485:2003 - Confusion? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 25
G Health & Safety Executive - ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 Confusion Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
T ISO/TS 16949:2002 Audit Confusion Internal Auditing 21
F ISO 9001:2000 Confusion - Process Aspects: Interactions, Inputs, Outputs, Etc. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S Numbering Confusion - BS EN ISO 9001:2000 vs. Other national versions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
John C. Abnet ISO 45001:2018 (5.4 - Consultation and participation of workers) Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
Sidney Vianna What ISO Standard (under the TC 176) supports the UN Sustainable Development Goal #10? ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 11
S ISO 15223-1:2020 Symbols Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
John C. Abnet ISO 9001 4.4.1 "...shall determine the processes needed..." ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 46
R ISO 10993-18 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
J Can signed agreements over-ride review of every "contract" under ISO 13485:2016? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
R Applicable ISO standards - packaging and others Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
J Implementing an ISO 13485 QMS Software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Q EN ISO 13485:2016/AC:2018 - AC:2018 being stated in the applicable harmonized standard listing Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
M ISO 10993-17 - Ancillary Medicinal substance leachables Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Medical Devices - Ancillary - ISO 10993-17 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
J Leveraging another company's ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
J New Job Position - Achieving ISO 13485 Certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S ISO 9001 Clause 8.2.3 - Review of the requirements for products and services in a Cafe ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
A ISO 17025 - Methods validation and clients ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
A Scope of ISO 13485 certificate ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A ASL requirement when the supplier is certified for ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D ISO 9001 certificate issued by QMS International for 10 years - legit? Registrars and Notified Bodies 17
Z Does anyone have experience with EN ISO 17664 ? IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 9
K Medical Device Repairs and ISO Scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
K Software Updates in the Field and ISO scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M ISO 13485-2016 online certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Z Auditor Findings ISO 14001:2015 vs. 45001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
S Supplier Management ISO 13485: 2016- Which supplier needs to fill in a self assessment form? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C ISO/IEC 17021-1 clause 7.1.2 - Determination of competence criteria Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
G ISO 17023 2017-11 - Suggestions for good books ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
B Timeframe for updating QMS / transitioning from ISO 14971:2012 to ISO 14971:2019 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 10
M ISO 9001:2015 and AS6081:2012 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
B Gage calibration frequency, ISO and IATF - What are the requirements Calibration Frequency (Interval) 3
M FDA News FDA Releases Draft Guidance Clarifying Application of ISO 10993-1 Biocompatibility Standard Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
C Implementation ISO 9001: 2015 ? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
C ISO/ IEC 17021 Resource requirement (need help) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
J Possible to get ISO 13485 certified with only OEM Product? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D ISO 14971:2019 vs MDR Annex 1, Requirement #4 - "Manufacturers shall inform users of any residual risks" ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
D Definition of equipment for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
L Biological Assessment (ISO 10993-1) Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M ISO 13485:2016 Complaint Definition Clarity Customer Complaints 2
eule del ayre Documented Information - Periodic Review of Documents? IATF 16949:2016 / ISO 9001:2015 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 34
J ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001 & OHSAS18000 (IMS) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
G ISO 14001 - 6.1.3 Compliance Obligations ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom