SBS - The best value in QMS software

ISO Confusion - Do we comply and other questions

Q

Q rex

#1
I'm going to use the terminology of 9k-'94, because I am a lot more familiar with it, apologies.

My company is basically in the information field. Our product is information, used by our customer to build or retrofit a facility, make a decision, purchase equipment or material.

Our business is "design". Our product is "design documents". We have a business process approach in place that served to migrate from our TQM program to ISO 9001 certification.

In my opinion, we have many of the requirements of the standard for, e.g., design, applied to our product, because it is "design". Similarly, we seem to have crosslinked the definitions of document, record, and product, and applied all of the requirements of the standard for each of these to all of them in our QMS documentation.

We have a documentation matrix that 0points to where we appear to have pasted someone's idea of key phrases from the standard into sometimes unrelated sections of our business procedures.

We map control of nonconforming product into our Corrective Action procedure, which in practice looks at projects during audit, when nonconforming product, if it existed, is already in the client's hands.

We have a procedure for calibration, even though the scope of this procedure in no way relates to instruments that measure the quality of our product.

Following the thoughts of The Audit Guy, nonconforming product only exists when tested or inspected and found to fail. In the case of an intangible product such as information, there isn't a warehouse of off-spec widgets to be concerned about. When defects in information become known, the information includes the correction.

The model the '94 standard embodies does not seem all that well suited to an iterative endeavor, such as "design". Preliminary information is developed, review with client elucidates many of the client's requirements that he/she was unable to communicate without benefit of the preliminary information developed. The linear, unbranched, uniterated model of the standard is difficult to impose on the iterative processes of design. Lack of understanding of how to go about this produces a cobbled together QMS that gets ignored by users, like VCR manuals that appear to have been translated from Japanese into Finnish, Finnish to Swahili, Swahili into English.

I'd like to hear the thoughts of the
Forum on this. Thanks.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration with a Mask on...
Staff member
Admin
#2
->The model the '94 standard embodies does not seem all that
->well suited to an iterative endeavor, such as "design".
->Preliminary information is developed, review with client
->elucidates many of the client's requirements that he/she
->was unable to communicate without benefit of the
->preliminary information developed. The linear, unbranched,
->uniterated model of the standard is difficult to impose on
->the iterative processes of design. Lack of understanding
->of how to go about this produces a cobbled together QMS
->that gets ignored by users, like VCR manuals that appear
->to have been translated from Japanese into Finnish,
->Finnish to Swahili,

Well, you have me. Design is iterative. That is to say designs are changed from time to time. Some are changed quite frequently. In the actual process, there are many times where the process 'loops back upon its self'. A good example is where you validate your design. The validation may fail which causes you to loop back and try again. Where in the design process it loops back to depends upon the failure mode and the root cause.

ISO 9001:1994 is not linear per se. Nor is the 2000 version. I think you better break down what you are trying to say in simplier terms.

In my implementation guide I stress that each everything a company does is interactive. You talk about a 'cobbled together QMS'. How so? You should be able to put together a high level flow chart which outlines top level interactions. In the same vein, you can do the same to the sub-processes.

Take a look through the slides from about http://Elsmar.com/Imp/sld025.htm

If you can be a bit more specific with less complex verbiage maybe I can better comment.

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 20 April 2001).]
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Risk Analysis Flow - Confusion between ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 8
M IAS (USA) Accreditation with IAF for ISO 13485 Logo Confusion EU Medical Device Regulations 10
M Accept/Reject (Ac/Re) Numbers (ISO 2859-1) Confusion Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A Informational Confusion about Risks for Processes in ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 44
S EN ISO 13485:2012 vs. ISO 13485:2003 - Confusion? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 25
G Health & Safety Executive - ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 Confusion Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
T ISO/TS 16949:2002 Audit Confusion Internal Auditing 21
F ISO 9001:2000 Confusion - Process Aspects: Interactions, Inputs, Outputs, Etc. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S Numbering Confusion - BS EN ISO 9001:2000 vs. Other national versions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
J Opportunity in ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
D Reports under change management | ISO 13485:2016 & ISO 9001:2015 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
P ISO 8 classified medical manufacturing room Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
Le Chiffre Online training available for ISO/IEC 17021-1: Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
B ISO 6508 and portable hardness measurement instruments General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
M Scope for ISO 13485 Certification of a Translation Service Provider ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 14
S Knee Implant (Femoral -Cobalt chrome)-Sub chronic toxicity test (ISO 10993-11)choice of root Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
Sidney Vianna Release of ISO 10013:2021, Quality management systems – Guidance for documented information Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
K Integrating ISO 9001:2015 with ISO 17025:2017 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Q ISO 13485 7.5.6 Validation - Off the shelf Software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A ISO 13485 Certification for Resin Manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
R Remote Audits for ISO 9001 (or any other standard) General Auditing Discussions 29
A ISO 13485 Sterilization Clause Applicability ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
K ISO 13485 and compliance of electronic signature ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
T ISO 13485 - Assembly instructions written vs. online ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M ISO 13485:2016 internal audit checklist Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
D ISO 17021 Certificate Registrars and Notified Bodies 1
X ISO 17025 certification for Laboratory for online gambling products ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
C ISO 19227 Validation Cost Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
N 93/42/EEC certification without ISO 13485 EU Medical Device Regulations 3
T Relationship between ISO 9001 and ISO – IEC BS EN 870079- 34 2020 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
M How Specific in an ISO 13485:2016 Scope for a Contract Manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
A ISO 13485 for Class 1 Medical Device ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
S Sequence of ISO 9001:2015 Implementation Steps ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
qualprod Business Continuity Planning in ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
T Help with BS EN ISO - IEC 80079-34 2020 (Explosive atmospheres QMS) Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
C Sampling - ISO 16269-6 vs ISO 2859 Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
Brizilla Employee Data Privacy Policy - ISO 9001:2015 requirement(s)? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R ISO 17025 - ISO Guides 33 & 80 ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
0 ISO 13485:2016 Chapter 8 Integration of the subsections ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S ISO 9001:2015 Internal Auditing Internal Auditing 8
Q Process: Knowledge Section 7.1.6 of ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
N ISO 27001 for Jumb Burger - Risk Assessment sheet IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 10
H What ISO certification is for an IT department? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
M Change in Constitution / Ownership of firm -------ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
P ISO 9001 certification with zero customers? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
M ISO 14971 Determination of Competent Persons ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
R Clinical accuracy and repeatability of IR(infrared) thermometer, no maximum error criteria is recommended in ISO Other Medical Device Related Standards 11
Q The scope of ISO 21534 Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
A What must be recorded? (ISO 9001:2015, subclause 10.2) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
M ISO 14971:2019: Criteria for overall residual risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom