SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

ISO Confusion - Do we comply and other questions

Q

Q rex

#1
I'm going to use the terminology of 9k-'94, because I am a lot more familiar with it, apologies.

My company is basically in the information field. Our product is information, used by our customer to build or retrofit a facility, make a decision, purchase equipment or material.

Our business is "design". Our product is "design documents". We have a business process approach in place that served to migrate from our TQM program to ISO 9001 certification.

In my opinion, we have many of the requirements of the standard for, e.g., design, applied to our product, because it is "design". Similarly, we seem to have crosslinked the definitions of document, record, and product, and applied all of the requirements of the standard for each of these to all of them in our QMS documentation.

We have a documentation matrix that 0points to where we appear to have pasted someone's idea of key phrases from the standard into sometimes unrelated sections of our business procedures.

We map control of nonconforming product into our Corrective Action procedure, which in practice looks at projects during audit, when nonconforming product, if it existed, is already in the client's hands.

We have a procedure for calibration, even though the scope of this procedure in no way relates to instruments that measure the quality of our product.

Following the thoughts of The Audit Guy, nonconforming product only exists when tested or inspected and found to fail. In the case of an intangible product such as information, there isn't a warehouse of off-spec widgets to be concerned about. When defects in information become known, the information includes the correction.

The model the '94 standard embodies does not seem all that well suited to an iterative endeavor, such as "design". Preliminary information is developed, review with client elucidates many of the client's requirements that he/she was unable to communicate without benefit of the preliminary information developed. The linear, unbranched, uniterated model of the standard is difficult to impose on the iterative processes of design. Lack of understanding of how to go about this produces a cobbled together QMS that gets ignored by users, like VCR manuals that appear to have been translated from Japanese into Finnish, Finnish to Swahili, Swahili into English.

I'd like to hear the thoughts of the
Forum on this. Thanks.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#2
->The model the '94 standard embodies does not seem all that
->well suited to an iterative endeavor, such as "design".
->Preliminary information is developed, review with client
->elucidates many of the client's requirements that he/she
->was unable to communicate without benefit of the
->preliminary information developed. The linear, unbranched,
->uniterated model of the standard is difficult to impose on
->the iterative processes of design. Lack of understanding
->of how to go about this produces a cobbled together QMS
->that gets ignored by users, like VCR manuals that appear
->to have been translated from Japanese into Finnish,
->Finnish to Swahili,

Well, you have me. Design is iterative. That is to say designs are changed from time to time. Some are changed quite frequently. In the actual process, there are many times where the process 'loops back upon its self'. A good example is where you validate your design. The validation may fail which causes you to loop back and try again. Where in the design process it loops back to depends upon the failure mode and the root cause.

ISO 9001:1994 is not linear per se. Nor is the 2000 version. I think you better break down what you are trying to say in simplier terms.

In my implementation guide I stress that each everything a company does is interactive. You talk about a 'cobbled together QMS'. How so? You should be able to put together a high level flow chart which outlines top level interactions. In the same vein, you can do the same to the sub-processes.

Take a look through the slides from about http://Elsmar.com/Imp/sld025.htm

If you can be a bit more specific with less complex verbiage maybe I can better comment.

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 20 April 2001).]
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Risk Analysis Flow - Confusion between ISO 14971 and IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 8
M IAS (USA) Accreditation with IAF for ISO 13485 Logo Confusion EU Medical Device Regulations 10
M Accept/Reject (Ac/Re) Numbers (ISO 2859-1) Confusion Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
A Informational Confusion about Risks for Processes in ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 44
S EN ISO 13485:2012 vs. ISO 13485:2003 - Confusion? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 25
G Health & Safety Executive - ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 Confusion Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
T ISO/TS 16949:2002 Audit Confusion Internal Auditing 21
F ISO 9001:2000 Confusion - Process Aspects: Interactions, Inputs, Outputs, Etc. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S Numbering Confusion - BS EN ISO 9001:2000 vs. Other national versions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
A ISO 9001 Audit Question General Auditing Discussions 0
D Question on Documented Calibration versus ISO 17025 Accredited Calibration ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
M Customer Property - ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.5.10 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
pbojsen ISO 13485 Requirements versus FDA product classification and GMP exemptions - Audits ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D "certified" in ISO 19011, as well as IATF required? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
S ISO/IEC 15408 - Is this is Certifiable Standard? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
D Lead time to schedule an ISO 13485 audit Auditing Quality and Environmental Management Systems 2
T Do we need an SOP for ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
K ISO 9001 Auditing in a Healthcare setting Auditing Quality and Environmental Management Systems 15
S Does anyone have a checklist to prepare for ISO 13485, Stage I audit? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
H QMS ISO 13485:2016 - ISO14971 IEC60304 etc ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
Y How can i integrate ISO 13845 into ISO 27001? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
vickyva ISO 14155:2020 CIP CIR templates Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
C ISO 9001:2015 8.3.2. h) Design and Development Planning - What is required? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
B Employee Handbook in ISO 9001:2015 Section 7 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
B Operational Procedures for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Q ISO 9001/IATF 16949 Audit Finding Question - Document Retention IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
D ISO 14971 applicability in ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
G Trying to get a financially reasonable ISO Certification Body Registrars and Notified Bodies 8
L ISO 45001:2018 - Clause 5.4: Consultation and Participation of Workers Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 1
E ISO 13485 in Clinical Trial conduct: Applicable or No ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
G ISO 13485 Certification - Can we get the ISO 13485 certification prior to shipment of the device? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Richard Regalado Informational ISO/IEC DIS 27001:2021, to be published soon. IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
Q Audit report template ISO 9001/14001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
N Does anyone use SGS for ISO 13485 / CE certification Registrars and Notified Bodies 0
Q Process matrix examples of ISO 9001 & 14001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S Need ISO 15189:2012 Documentation toolkit. Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
chris1price Archiving of paper records - ISO 9001 7.5.3.1b Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
M Transferring ISO 17025 from one company to another ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
D Common practices in ISO 9001 deployment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
Q ISO 9001-2015 Internal audit finding Internal Auditing 12
P Audit check for IT company (ISO 9001) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M Label Making & Printing Standards ISO / ASTM ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance document to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Ed Panek ISO 13485:2016 Section 5.5.3 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Q Do these certificates of calibration meet ISO 9001 requirements for traceability to NIST? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
ebrahim QMS as per ISO 13485, Clause 4.2 Requirements for regulatory purposes for Medical Devices Authorized Representatives. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S ISO 2768-mk print call out Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 11
T ISO 17024, clauses 4.3.8. and 5.1.1. Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
C ISO 14001:2015 6.1.3 Compliance Obligations - Legal requirements monitoring ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 0
C Requirement to link Quality Manual to ISO 9001 clause numbers? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13

Similar threads

Top Bottom