ISO/ IEC 17021 Accreditation replacing Guide 62 & Guide 66

C

cheahga

Hi All,

Just to share with you that ISO has finally released the requirement for accreditation rules replacing guide 62 & 66.

BTW, does anyone seen the details of the standard? May I know what is the changes that will be impacting the CB & certification process?:tg:
Details from ISO as below:

Ref.: 1028
15 September 2006

New ISO/IEC standard to increase confidence in management system certification
Hundreds of thousands of organizations worldwide, their customers, consumers and regulatory authorities stand to benefit from a new ISO/IEC standard designed to increase confidence in management system certification.

ISO/IEC 17021:2006, Conformity assessment – Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, places rigorous requirements for competence and impartiality on the bodies that offer audit and certification to standards like ISO 9001:2000 (quality management) and ISO 14001:2004 (environmental management).

The new standard has a huge potential impact since according to the latest figures, some 888 000 organizations in 161 countries are independently certified to ISO 9001:2000 and/or ISO 14001:2004.

ISO/IEC 17021:2006 is compatible with a further expansion of management system certification. It has been designed as the single source of internationally harmonized requirements for certification bodies and their activities not only in relation to ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004, but also to new management standards for food safety (ISO 22000), information security (ISO/IEC 27001:2005) and supply chain security (ISO/PAS 28000:2005), as well as to any others that may be developed.

Alister Dalrymple, co-convenor of the group of experts that developed the standard, commented: “ISO/IEC 17021:2006 will be a common basis for any future work within ISO when a need is perceived to have the effective implementation of a management system standard verified by independent (“third party”) audit and certification. Because this will encourage consistent good practice, the standard provides value for the organizations that implement management systems, for the bodies that provide them with certification services and, ultimately, for customers, consumers and regulators of the products and services covered by the management systems.”

Replacing and improving on two ISO/IEC Guides (62 and 66), ISO/IEC 17021:2006 distills an international consensus on the latest in good practice. In addition, it incorporates guidance developed by the International Accreditation Forum (IAF). This is an international association of the accreditation bodies set up in many countries to approve (“accredit”) certification bodies as competent.

Co-convenor Randy Dougherty explained: “Because ISO/IEC 17021:2006 provides the requirements for performing certification to any management system, it becomes the unique requirements document for accrediting bodies that certify any management system. This will help to ensure consistent good practice both by accreditation and by certification bodies, which is good for confidence in these activities and therefore good for international trade.”

ISO/IEC 17021:2006 represents a new model for the standards that make up ISO’s “tool box” for conformity assessment, which is the evaluation of products, services, systems, processes and materials against standards, regulations or other specifications. It innovates in presenting principles of certification, then the performance-based requirements that flow from them. These principles cover impartiality, competence, responsibility, openness, confidentiality and responsiveness to complaints. The standard underlines the need to ensure the competence of all the personnel of the certification body – not just auditors – in the management system certification process.

Requirements for impartiality include the following: demonstration by the top management of certification bodies of the need to avoid conflicts of interest between certification and consultancy, training and internal auditing services; the marketing of certification services, and the subcontracting of audits.

The certification body is required to set up a committee for safeguarding impartiality. The standard envisages that such a committee could include representatives of clients of the certification body, customers of these clients, trade associations, regulatory bodies, governmental and nongovernmental organizations, and consumer associations.

Additionally, the certification body is required to implement a management system to ensure its conformity to ISO/IEC17021:2006.

ISO/IEC 17021:2006, Conformity assessment – Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, costs 108 Swiss francs and is available from ISO national member institutes (see the complete list with contact details) and ISO Central Secretariat (see below). It was developed by working group WG 21, Management system certification, of ISO/CASCO, Committee on conformity assessment.

Note to Editors:
Certification of conformity is not a requirement of ISO standards, including ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004, which can be implemented without certification for the benefits that they help user organizations to achieve for themselves and for their customers. Nevertheless, many thousands of organizations have chosen certification because of the perception that an independent confirmation of conformity adds value.

ISO itself does not perform certification to its standards, does not issue certificates and does not control certification performed independently of ISO by other organizations.

ISO/CASCO, Committee on conformity assessment, develops voluntary standards and guides to encourage good practice and consistency worldwide in accreditation, certification and related activities.
 

Hershal

Metrologist-Auditor
Trusted Information Resource
I still think it would be interesting to see a requirement to requirement (not clause to clause necessarily) comparison of ISO/IEC 17011 and ISO/IEC 17021.....

Hershal
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
Meow! Meow! <for those with a catty frame of mind.>

So - it's "old" news. I missed Sidney's original post while without internet connection. As I read through the press release, I was struck by this line:
The new standard has a huge potential impact since according to the latest figures, some 888 000 organizations in 161 countries are independently certified to ISO 9001:2000 and/or ISO 14001:2004.
Where are these latest figures? Who validates them? ISO, itself, does not keep a runnng tally, since it really has no legal connection with a certificate of registration for any organization.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
Where are these latest figures? Who validates them? ISO, itself, does not keep a runnng tally, since it really has no legal connection with a certificate of registration for any organization.
https://www.iso.org/iso/en/iso9000-14000/pdf/survey2005.pdf


ISO itself does not perform certification to its standards, does not issue certificates and does not control certification performed independently of ISO by other organizations. However, it frequently receives requests for information on the number of certificates and this led the organization to undertake The ISO Survey, which is now in its 13th year. ISO provides the basic results free-of-charge as a public information service on its Web site : www.iso.org The collection and compilation of data for the 2005 survey was outsourced for the second consecutive year to the market research firm ACNielsen, of Vienna, Austria.
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
:agree1:
https://www.iso.org/iso/en/iso9000-14000/pdf/survey2005.pdf


ISO itself does not perform certification to its standards, does not issue certificates and does not control certification performed independently of ISO by other organizations. However, it frequently receives requests for information on the number of certificates and this led the organization to undertake The ISO Survey, which is now in its 13th year. ISO provides the basic results free-of-charge as a public information service on its Web site : www.iso.org The collection and compilation of data for the 2005 survey was outsourced for the second consecutive year to the market research firm ACNielsen, of Vienna, Austria.
Thank you Sidney. The survey, of course, raises other questions. How many auditors are employed world-wide to perform 776,608 yearly reassessments (the number of ISOk2k certs listed for 2005)? plus do training of internal auditors in other segments of the certifying body operations? plus do original and reassessment of ISO14000 plus ISO 13485 plus TS16949, etc.?

Do we here at the Cove have our rightful market share of all those auditors as registered members? of the QMs at those registered organizations? of the lead internal auditors? of the management reps? of the consultants helping organizations prepare for registration? of the heirs apparent being groomed by the foregoing? Seems to me our 25,000 registered Covers has a far stretch to go.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
Certification bodies given two years for transition to ISO/IEC 17021:2006

(broken link removed)

Ref.: 1041
18 December 2006
Certification bodies given two years for transition to ISO/IEC 17021:2006

Certification bodies have been given a deadline of 15 September 2008 for implementing (broken link removed), the new standard designed to increase confidence in management system certification.
The deadline has been set, in consultation with ISO, by the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), an international association of the accreditation bodies set up in many countries to approve (“accredit”) certification bodies as competent.

ISO/IEC 17021:2006, Conformity assessment – Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, places rigorous requirements for competence and impartiality on the bodies that offer audit and certification to standards like ISO 9001:2000 (quality management) and ISO 14001:2004 (environmental management). It provides the option for a certification body to have a quality management system based on ISO 9001:2000 and to have conformity verified by accreditation bodies.

The IAF has set the 15 September 2008 deadline, two years after the publication of ISO/IEC 17021:2006, for the following reasons:
  • Migrating to the new requirements may require translations, changes to procedures, contracts, committees and other arrangements, all of which take time.
  • Certification bodies will also need time to identify changes needed to their own quality management systems to conform to the new requirements and to prepare and implement transition plans.
ISO/IEC 17021:2006 replaces and improves on two separate documents, ISO/IEC Guide 62:1996 and ISO/IEC Guide 66:1996, which respectively gave the requirements for certification bodies practising quality and environmental management system certification.
ISO/IEC 17021:2006 is compatible with a further expansion of management system certification. It has been designed as the single source of internationally harmonized requirements for certification bodies and their activities not only in relation to ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004, but also to new management standards for food safety (ISO 22000), information security (ISO/IEC 27001:2005) and supply chain security (ISO/PAS 28000:2005), as well as to any others that may be developed.
 

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
Quick question for the brains out there. Do you think this definition is auditable? My emphasis.

ISO IEC 17021 said:
3.2 - impartiality - actual and perceived presence of objectivity

As usual it is a loaded question! :notme:
 
Top Bottom