I have not had the dubious honor, and plan to avoid it like the black plague. This is a real slippery slope when we start looking at the standard as black and white requirements knowing that the registrars do not. There is entirely to much variation from registrar to registrar and from auditor to auditor regarding interpretaion of the requirements.
There is a nasty court case involving an unnamed farm implement manufacturer (ISO 9001 registered) where they are trying to use the design review requirements as a method of getting to design review minutes to determine which decisions where made based on what information. While we (the quality guys) might debate the relative value of some of the requirements in the standard, I would hate to think organizations will evaluate registration based on the potential law suit that might result due to a records requirement or the failure to dot all the i's and cross all the t's required under an ISO standard.
