Lenght of time that the product is "active" - 4.16.1 - Life of product + 1 year

M

Michel Saad

#1
Hi folks,

Can anyone give me a definintion of "lenght of time that the product is active" as stated in 4.16.1

We are having disagreements internally on this point. Where I worked before, it was stated as "duration of the contract + 1 year", but I am not sure that it meets the intent.

Let me know how you deal with this.

Michel
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
That is normally a requirement established by your customer; includes production and service requirements. Service requirements can be as long as 10 years.
 
#3
That is normally a requirement established by your customer; includes production and service requirements. Service requirements can be as long as 10 years.
 
M

Michel Saad

#4
Bonjour Lyman,

When you say that the product is active in your portfolio, do you include or exclude revisions. What I mean by that is if the part changed from XXXX rev A to XXXX rev B, do you keep the info of A for 1 extra year or do you keep it until the last of the revisions is no longer active (which could be many many years later)?

Thanks in advance

Michel
 
L

lyman

#5
Great question - I admit I hadn't contemplated it when I responded, although after asked I suspected what our position would be given the raging paranoia we have regarding throwing anything away. I went and confirmed my suspicions with one of our Quality Managers - we're going to keep everything (Rev data included) until such time that we are no longer producing the part. My question to you - would you set up your system such that a decision to destroy the records is based on the type of revision being made, i.e., if your changing your labels or labeling info and it requires a revision you're not going to pitch all the prior rev history incorporating your test results, etc., are you?

As you can see - our system will never require us to make those decisions, however, if we ever have a fire you should be able to spot it from Quebec because we'll have plenty of fuel!!
 
M

Michel Saad

#6
Make sure the fire is in winter and we can send you a couple hundred trucks of snow to help put it out!!

We have a 2 revision system. The parts are more like XXX rev A.1. For minor changes, the .1 will move to .2 while for major changes (fit, form, function, reliability), the letter revision will change. We have some parts at F.12 and they have nothing to do with A.1, so I ask why keep the data around? Obviously, we are going to be smart and not throw away material from a previous revision if it is still useful. I am simply looking for a way to not HAVE TO keep material forever if it has no added value. The issue is, does treating a new revision of product like a new product (even though the part number doesn't change) meet the intent of 4.16 of QS9000?

Regards,

Michel
 
L

lyman

#7
I can only speak for myself as an auditor (maybe Marc or someone else can let you know how they would audit to this requirement) but if I audited my engineering/design groups and their system was set up like yours I would expect that they could provide the appropriate new documentation/samples, etc. as required under Sect. III of PPAP. I would also expect that they could show me a Rev history or some linkage between revs. As long as their records reflect their complete current process then if they had documented to destroy prior revision records after the calendar year requirement was met I wouldn't have an issue with that.
 
L

lyman

#8
Bonjour Michel:

The group I formerly worked for, who were QS9K certified in 1998 (and the one that I now work for - who are busy putting our system together for certification in 2001)are writing our retention documents as follows: records will be retained for families of devices or single devices for as long as the device remains active in our portfolio + one calendar year. If you look at the PPAP Manual, Sect. VI (bold printed text specifically, add Sect. 4.16.1.S of the Semiconductor Supplement, in addition to the requirements under Sect. 4.16 of QS9K I think you can understand how we have come to our decision. (QS9K requirements turned out to be one of the great motivators to cull the portfolio at my last job, I'm hoping it will have the same effect here.)

Regards
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Staff member
Admin
#9
Originally posted by lyman:

...we're going to keep everything (Rev data included) until such time that we are no longer producing the part.
I think this is the key.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
JoCam On-product labels for Medical Devices EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Awais How to mistake proof - Shipping Orders with Shortages - Product Quantity Accountability mismatch with Job Traveller? Manufacturing and Related Processes 17
L Product and process Deviation procedure Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
H Using/Selling power banks with your product as a "mobile version" CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
H Electronic care product on patient bed side - Flammability requirements (62368-1) Hospitals, Clinics & other Health Care Providers 0
B Design Responsibilities for Mature Acquired Product Lines ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Dental application - medical product or not? Other US Medical Device Regulations 8
Q Product Quality vs Product Defects Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
J Verification of purchased product / supplier questionnaires ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
E Any template/ form of Monitoring and Measurement of Processes and product to ISO 13485? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
S Product Code 510(k) exemption US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
M REACH assessment of PCBA/finished product REACH and RoHS Conversations 2
J Validity of CE mark on distributed product when company ceases trading EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Q News cradle to grave - Product life cycle ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5
J Using of CE marking - Two CE markings on the product CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
W Final Report re: Market withdrawal of radiation-emitting product Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
M Combination Product - New MAA EU Medical Device Regulations 0
pbojsen ISO 13485 Requirements versus FDA product classification and GMP exemptions - Audits ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Z REACH compliance for low volume product REACH and RoHS Conversations 1
chris1price Notified Body responsible for product safety under MDD? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Does a refurbished product required a new UDI? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
lanley liao How to understand and master the requirements of each section in API monogram product. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 5
H Verification Process for the existing MDS Product IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5
A UDI for product already packed up EU Medical Device Regulations 0
A Migrating from whole product CE marking to modular approach CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
H Medical device Product Registration Registrars and Notified Bodies 2
A Can a power Supply be an accessory to a medical device, if it is an 'off-the-shelf' product. IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
M Extension to shelf life of new product under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
lanley liao Are there guidelines for application of all API monogrammal product? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
S ISO 11137- Simulated product vs SIP Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
K Interesting Discussion "World Class Product" based QM. I need advice. Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 14
R IATF 16949 Certification for new site with transferred product--what is the impact with CSR and scorecards? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
William55401 Distributed By Product - Best Practices for Configuration Management and Purchasing Controls ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
R Compatibility studies - combination product CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
R Compatibility studies - Medicinal Product and Medical Device Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
J Marking "Distributed By" to product with distributors' reference-code EU Medical Device Regulations 3
dinaroxentool Selling a product in Both UK and EU after Brexit UK Medical Device Regulations 9
P EU MDR Translation of Product Name EU Medical Device Regulations 3
N Is this a single integral drug device combination product EU MDR CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
V New Product Model CE Mark Certification under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Sidney Vianna Informational APQP4Wind - Advanced Product Quality Planning for the Wind Power Supply Chain APQP and PPAP 3
K 510k FDA review, will they accept Biocompatibility result generated using feasibility product lots? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
G Adopting old product - compliance with IEC 62304 IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 12
S How long does it take to register a product with MHRA? UK Medical Device Regulations 8
D Classification of product for clinical trials EU Medical Device Regulations 14
N Adding unclassified product to the medical device registration US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
B Internal Auditor Competency - Product Auditors Internal Auditing 9
T PFMEA and Control Plans on legacy product FMEA and Control Plans 5
P FDA Approved Product Contact Parts ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S AS9120B - 8.5.2 Delivering Split Product AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom