P
patfee
Just looking for some feedback / confirmation on the most appropriate way forward.
After various important project phases, i.e. mobilization, execution, demobilization etc. we (the project department) normally conduct an audit or a lessons learned meeting.
From these audits / lessons learned meetings, there could be some potential preventive actions to be allocated.
In my opinion, the QHSE department should identify, allocate and follow-up on such preventive actions (particularly on the identification part).
The QHSE deps opinion is that identification of preventive actions is done by the project team them selfs. Rest of the process, i.e. allocation and follow-up, is there responsibility.
I base my opinion on the fact that the identification process should be done by “someone” independent also having oversight on other audits / lessons learned.
Which one is the right approach?
Identification by the Project Dep or QHSE Dep?
Many thanks for your thoughts
Rgds
Patrick
After various important project phases, i.e. mobilization, execution, demobilization etc. we (the project department) normally conduct an audit or a lessons learned meeting.
From these audits / lessons learned meetings, there could be some potential preventive actions to be allocated.
In my opinion, the QHSE department should identify, allocate and follow-up on such preventive actions (particularly on the identification part).
The QHSE deps opinion is that identification of preventive actions is done by the project team them selfs. Rest of the process, i.e. allocation and follow-up, is there responsibility.
I base my opinion on the fact that the identification process should be done by “someone” independent also having oversight on other audits / lessons learned.
Which one is the right approach?
Identification by the Project Dep or QHSE Dep?
Many thanks for your thoughts
Rgds
Patrick