Level II Containment or CS2 Controlled Shipping Level 2

Outside of the Big 3, can anyone initiate Controlled Shipping-Level 2 (CS2)? It was my understanding that if a non-conforming part reached one of the Big 3, than they could initiate their containment measures. But, if a part did not reach one of the Big 3, it only reached Tier 2 Supplier, could they initiate Level II Containment on their supplier? Please help!!!

Elsmar Forum Sponsor


Hi Amy - welcome to the Cove.

The short and not so sweet answer is - your customer can do pretty much what they want to depending on how much you value them as a customer.

One thing to consider - your customer may have gone through level 2 containment and is "gun shy" whenever they encounter a problem that could get them back on. Or maybe they are still on in connection with another part/product.

Realistically, if you really did send a gross nonconformance to your customer, and they were concerned about sending it on to their customer (rightly so), they would want to 100% inspect all your parts. Should they have to pay for the additional inspection? You have shown that your controls aren't good enough to keep the nonconformance from going to them so what choice do they have? Using a 3rd party inspection and charging you is about all that's left.

Look at your controls, come up with some "fail safes", do some statistical documentation of your own and go to your customer with a plan for you to eliminate the nonconformance.

Today's business with charge backs and 3rd party inspections points out the advantage of spending some of the "cost of quality" on prevention. It is proving the theory that one dollar spent on prevention is worth 100 dollars of appraisal and 1000 dollars of failure (numbers are exagerated but you get the idea).

Once again, welcome to the Cove.


Bill Ryan - 2007

The short and not so sweet answer is - your customer can do pretty much what they want to depending on how much you value them as a customer.

Hi Amy, and welcome,

Unfortunately Dave is absolutely correct. My company has just been "relieved" of CS-2 as a Tier 1 to GM. That same day we were put into CS-2 as a Tier 2 by a Tier 1 customer.

Management made the decision that this customer was important enough to our business that we would abide by the containment "rules". Once that decision was relayed to the customer, they decided to put all parts we (and other suppliers)make for them into CS-1 (a fairly good number of parts!!). Management decided to go along with that also. What that has done to our engineering group is nothing short of remarkable - suddenly every PFMEA is being pulled out and having a "deep dive" review and update. Action items are being assigned (and even being done on time!!!).

While the pace of activity is hard to keep up with, it really is exciting to see the rate at which improvements are being made. I have been harping on the importance of performing the FMEA excersize properly and letting that drive the necessary controls for years. Now I just need 36 hour days to keep up with the documentation aspect.

Isn't it funny that it takes a significant financial hit before senior management decides quality might actually make a difference to the bottom line in the long term? (Sorry, I just couldn't resist that)


rick tompkins - 2013

Good that a CS 2 is a last resort to assign a supplier, but it's still a remedial containment activity in a corrective actions. Here's the situation I discovered recently:
My supplier, a plastics injection molder, continually shipped cavity separated parts with burns, short shots, flashed over slots, etc. and the problems moved from one or more cavities to others EVERY SHIPMENT.
An in-person audit revealed that the interval of attribute inspection needed an increase change to sampling per container at the press. The supplier continued to control its discrepancies with full-shot sampling once per shift, when each cavities produced two containers per shift. So, was it any wonder that random NCs in 6 containers produced per day would keep occurring?
The supplier was placed on CS 2 but chose, on their own, to only escalate to CS 1 and 100% sorted with its own personnel and placed a contract with a CS 2 group on hold. However, the same discrepancies have been reaching my company.
I continued my CS 2 recommendation and finally quit my job as SQE last week. Apparently the cozy relationship between the supplier's low costing of product took priority over its inadequate Product Realization performance.
The old addage "you get what you pay for" will haunt my former employer, who will need to keep chasing their **** after it's delivered. :)
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
L Level 2 Containment requirements - Appearance issues Nonconformance and Corrective Action 9
I Higher level of packaging UDI-PI EU Medical Device Regulations 8
R Using RPN to Confirm Risk Reduced to an Acceptable Level Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 12
qualprod Do sum of results of quality objectives should met a high level goal? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
D Maturity level and the way to obtain it Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 2
T FDA level of concern vs IEC 62304 safety classification - 510(k) exempt device Other US Medical Device Regulations 13
F GM BIQS level 4 requirements Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1
K Level 1 PPAP Submission APQP and PPAP 11
H At what level (harm, hazardous situation, seq. of events, etc) is "risk" estimated? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 12
F Site level CMRT reporting: how? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 0
T NDT/NDE Level 2 Technicians Certification Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 20
T How can I determine the current level of exposure to talc in the workplace? Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
M Packaging level EU Medical Device Regulations 2
B UKRP to what level should you audit Class I Technical Documentation? UK Medical Device Regulations 0
D What does a level 1 (PSW) PPAP actually promise? APQP and PPAP 19
A % of defects on the whole batch based on result from inspection under AQL Level II Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
R IATF and ASPICE level 2 Design and Development of Products and Processes 9
B ANOVA 3 level and 4 factors f and p values are not showing Using Minitab Software 0
N Level 3 PPAPs APQP and PPAP 4
J Part submission warrant for Level 1 PPAP APQP and PPAP 1
A Defining a lower ESD test level in IEC 60601 safety test IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
was named killer Onsite Level II N.D.T. Training in Florida Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
D High level understanding of EUDAMED EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D Supplier Quality level category help - high level ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
silentmonkey Rationalising the level of effort and depth of software validation based on risk ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
Y What are different Special Inspection Level 1-4 and General spesification 1-3 ? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 0
D Supplier Quality - How to classify a supplier level Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 10
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Level 3 KPI Excel Template Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
M Informational How to perform a clinical evaluation of medical devices – Part 2 – Level of clinical evidence and what sufficient clinical evidence means Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 9
R Bottom up approach versus system level ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
C Failure nets - Same level effects FMEA and Control Plans 0
H Graphical analysis of results - Confidence level bands nomenclature Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
S Level of Clinical Evidence - MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D GM BIQS level 5 requirements Customer and Company Specific Requirements 5
I Sampling processes - Who must define the AQL level? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 9
R Identifying internal issues.. at what level? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
I What level of change in documentation requires re-training? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
M Level 3 PPAP submission of intentional defective parts APQP and PPAP 4
eule del ayre List of Level 3 PPAP requirements for automotive suppliers APQP and PPAP 20
I Document levels and approval requirements for lower level documents like work instructions, forms etc. Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 18
B AS9102 FAI & Lower Level Drawings - How should we perform the FAI? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
Rameshwar25 What is a Control Plan at "Material Level"? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
N How to resolve discrepancies in Level 3 PPAP supplier dimensional reports? APQP and PPAP 11
M Creating a Plant Level Value Stream Map Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 1
K Defining Acceptance Quality Level, I need clarity on AQL 1.5, 2.5, 4.0 AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 5
P GM BIQS level 5 training? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
Ron Rompen Dual level holes - Measurement method suggestions wanted General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
A Level of details required for Class IIb Product Verification and Validation CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
D System Level FMEA example wanted FMEA and Control Plans 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom