Thanks for the link. That does help me understand linearity better.
Regarding gages that are linear or not....I'm not even sure if any gages are non linear.
This is being driven by an audit finding that we received for not calibrating over the full range of a gage. Our calibration house calibrated toward lower end, middle and near upper end but not complete range. I got pulled in last minute to review our response and found that our procedures do not require us to calibrate over full range, only 3 spots along the linear travel. Our MSA procedure states that we have to perform linearity studies on new variable gages along the full range of the gage. That would cover the full range requirement. So, I'm not sure the audit finding is legit. I pointed this out to the auditor and her response was as follows:
You can do it the way you are talking about if you differentiate measuring devices that are ‘linear’ and those that are not, because then you have to specify the range over which to calibrate for the ‘non-linear’ devices. That is why most all organizations choose to specify the range or points to calibrate at over the range. It keeps it simpler for them rather than dealing with linear and on-linear. Your choice.
Now I'm just trying to figure out what she is referring to by 'non-linear". I was told that non linear would be gages like cmm, vision systems, etc that can measure in a full area vs along a linear straight line scale.....
Thoughts???