Less known, but still important:
If it's sloppy looking, your customer is more apt to dig into it. Nobody can send me a PPAP submission that I cannot find a problem with, if I want to. If what you send is disorganized and sloppy, I'm going to spend more time poking around in it, which will be more painful for you. Make sure things like your file names are organized and make sense. You should really number them by element number as well. Make sure that if you are printing to a pdf, you don't have stray page breaks, etc. Think of it like a job interview. It really kind of is - it's like a resume saying "I'm ready to make your part." You want a good first impression. That will give me confidence, and I am less likely to dig. And believe me, there is nothing worse than an SQ who starts digging that doesn't know what they are digging for. Depending on the complexity of the part, an SQ spends about 4 hours examining a PPAP. But if it's sloppy, it gets a lot more attention.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the insight sir very well said, I've been to some various process audit, but they usually notice what's not on the process. For example, in our manual painting booth, which paint, hardener and thinner are segregated with names on it and its expiration date for the FIFO. My point is he actually point out that that the paint used for their item must be segregated with others, they should be not included in the group, for some instances maybe our operator will use other paint/thinner/hardener, is that even rational? i am sorry for being off the topic but what i'm saying is based on the PPAP inclusion the control plan.