As Jennifer said, you shouldn't try to match a procedure to each clause of the standard, particularly for section 7. That section gives you requirements that your product realization processes must meet. Product realization processes are the main "do" bits of your work. If you bake cakes, its the baking process. If you build houses, count design, project management, purchasing, receiving and building itself. Each of these processes needs to meet the requirements in section 7 that may apply.
7.5.1 requires you to produce your product under controlled conditions, including (e), monitoring and measurement to verify product conformity. So your product realization processes will specify inspection or such to make sure the product is conforming. But the outputs of some processes are not readily monitored or measured. Take welding, for example. A weld may look great, but it may still be fragile or weak. A process that outputs such product is called a "special process" in ISO 9000. For those processes there is 7.5.2. It tells you how you should validate your process so that you get conforming product despite not being able to monitor or measure it.
So, for each of your product realization processes, look at its outputs. Can you readily and economically verify their conformity by monitoring and measuring? If so, then do it to meet 7.5.1(e). Else, the process is "special" and, per 7.5.2, you must "establish the [alternate] arrangements" to achieve the desired results.
