W
Hello All,
We're developing a device that will be a large capital equipment purchase for our customers. We anticipate that over it's life there will be several components that will require replcament due to wear from normal usage. I'm wondering how other manufacturers are maintaining component traceability in this situation. For example, we have a part that occurs in 4 separate locations within the device. Initially they all come from the same lot. If 1 of the 4 require replacement there will be 2 lots involved. Future replacements continue to add new lots to the DHR. Here are what I see as options. Should we insist that all 4 are replaced together (expensve to customer), mark each individual part with its lot number so it is identifyable (difficult for us), or simply keep track of which lots are used in the device (increased risk, no way to identify part to its lot)? How are others making these decisions? Am I missing an easy solution to maintain traceability to the parts?

We're developing a device that will be a large capital equipment purchase for our customers. We anticipate that over it's life there will be several components that will require replcament due to wear from normal usage. I'm wondering how other manufacturers are maintaining component traceability in this situation. For example, we have a part that occurs in 4 separate locations within the device. Initially they all come from the same lot. If 1 of the 4 require replacement there will be 2 lots involved. Future replacements continue to add new lots to the DHR. Here are what I see as options. Should we insist that all 4 are replaced together (expensve to customer), mark each individual part with its lot number so it is identifyable (difficult for us), or simply keep track of which lots are used in the device (increased risk, no way to identify part to its lot)? How are others making these decisions? Am I missing an easy solution to maintain traceability to the parts?
