Making a choice of Simple vs Comprehensiveness of Procedure/System of any Process

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#1
while designing a new-process (SOP) or automating the existing Quality system or procedure, for a bigger/larger/diverse teams, which route would you take.
1. small - compact - minimal system... which capture the essense of the process steps, and expect the teams to implement the letter and spirit of minute details! (some times even mean to allowing to capture the details at key steps of the process)
2. comprehensive - detailed - yet flexible system... which might seem to be JUST to capture the individual steps and each role in the process.

for eg., for a incident(deviation) reporting procedure, it could be as simple and minimal as description(with minimal fields to associate with the process/system or product etc.,) -- investigation summary/report-- capa -- approval - implementation/closure.

VS

(incident report - immediate Correction - review) - (investigation&CAPA - review - approval) - (CAPA implemtn- verification - closure) involving multiple roles, and back&forth iteratons possible in the workflow.

clearly, there are pros, & cons of both the routes.

if you take option 1. how do you ensure the participation, involvement, comprehensiveness of the process.
if you take option 2. how do you ensure that process does not drag / delay ( obviously, having all the people for all the deviations at the same time is a challenge!!!) (not that the involvement of all roles/people ensures, but surely its clearer than the option 1!!!)
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#2
Interesting topic...

I know it's probably copping out of the question, but I'd have to say some middle ground.

Given that systems are always evolving and approving, it shouldn't matter too much. Whether the system is too simple such that people are missing stuff, or too complicated as to become burdensome, these can always be analyzed and the system modified appropriately later...
Start with something (probably leaning towards the "simple" side), and go from there...
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#3
One comment - designing a process is not the same as creating a SOP. Creating process documents such as procedures would generally be steps 6 or 7 (in the end) of a process design.
 

v9991

Trusted Information Resource
#4
One comment - designing a process is not the same as creating a SOP. Creating process documents such as procedures would generally be steps 6 or 7 (in the end) of a process design.
I Agree...

But how should that process be...how simple!!!...how comprehensive!!!

I understand that...in the end, it is the implementation which makes difference wrt effectiveness of that process. but how much does the process contributes/enables the effectiveness of outcome, end results...achieving/maintainingg the desired state?
 
Last edited:
P

pldey42

#5
The variance lies in the people and it's a double-edged sword. Good people will do well with a minimal process, others won't. So first, I'd consider using education and training, as well as SOPs.

In the software industry I've addressed this problem by insisting on a rigid high level procedure (lifecycle we call it, to make it seem more intelligent) that demands a requirements spec, design specs, code, test specs and tests of components and the final systems. Each such phase completes with a mandatory test and inspection - called "quality gates," these are the main control points: if someone has wandered off-piste, they should detect and correct. They balance the costs and benefits of rigidity with those of flexibility.

Within the phases, I've offered additional "guidance" - procedures, guides, templates and the like - that they can use at will, with encouragement to share knowledge.

The guiding principle was to bet on people doing their best and support them with a library of procedures, guides, text books even, that they could choose to use, backed with quality gates at major control points to trap errors.

As an auditor I've often observed something similar in other industries, with more prescriptive approaches when either there's high staff turnover and minimal training budget, or serious health and safety or environmental risks.

Hope this helps
Pat
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J Masters Degree - Advice about a decision I"m going to be making Career and Occupation Discussions 9
U What is the process for making updates to our Processes? Design and Development of Products and Processes 11
M Informational US FDA Final Guidance – Consideration of Uncertainty in Making Benefit-Risk Determinations in Medical Device Premarket Approvals, De Novo Classificati Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
K Verifying gas tight glass syringe used for making standards General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
M Informational US FDA – Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Medical Device Decision Making Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational US FDA – Patient Preference Information (PPI) in Medical Device Decision-Making Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
U Electronic templates for making paper control charts Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 2
K Turtle diagram or process interaction chart - Making it easier for an auditor Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 22
E CSR SHIPPING - Need suggestions for making SOP/WI for our shipping dept (automotive)... Customer and Company Specific Requirements 11
O Reinstating a disqualified supplier—questions to ask before making a decision Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 2
D Controlled Documents & Note Making ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
I Making a process PFMEA, no DFMEA (non-automotive toll manufacturer) FMEA and Control Plans 1
M IATF 16949 Cl. 8.7.1.4 - Risk analysis for decision making about rework IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D Help needed for Compliance Road-Map - Startup making their first device (IVD) IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
C IATF 16949 Cl. 8.4.1.2 d) Multidisciplinary Decision Making IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
G Is it compulsory to make DFMEA for proto parts making organisation APQP and PPAP 1
L Making a Medical Devices Registration Database - Help and Suggestions Wanted Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
B Making a Safety Culture Chart Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 3
Marc ISO 9001:2015 vs. 2008 - Internal Audits - What changes are you making? Internal Auditing 44
4 Customer Making Changes to a 510k Device They Purchased 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
M Making a change to an approved Medical Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 9
M Making Amendments to a Quality Manual Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 2
K Making a Quality Requirements Handbook for Employees Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 10
D ROHS 2 - Medical Device: Placing vs Making Available on the market EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J Keyboard issue in Word - Making me nuts Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
W Chinese Distributor Making Counterfeit Products - Class I sterile products China Medical Device Regulations 2
P Making Quality and Compliance Invisible Imported Legacy Blogs 0
AnaMariaVR2 Structured Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment in Drug Regulatory Decision-Making Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
Proud Liberal Making a simple Sampling Plan by Variables Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
N Decision Making... (joke) Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 1
G The right approach for making the transition from ISO9001 to AS9100 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
M AS 9100 4.2.4 Process for making changes to records is not fully effective Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
V Making Solar cells, Module, String - Which Cleanroom Level? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 2
P Outsourced Manufacturing - Making Subcontractors comply with TL9000 TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 2
G Free ASTM Standards? Recent Court Ruling making their standards free? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 10
U ISO 13485 mandatory for a factory making Medical Devices for EU? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
B Categorization of Customer Complaint: Making Customers feel they are Top Priority Customer Complaints 4
E Starting Nadcap Accreditation and making an Implementation Timeline AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
C Making a Box Plot in Excel Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 3
V Ideas, Measures/Metrics for making Quality Proactive? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
D 3D Printers - Making Replicas Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 11
E Third party auditor's statement about SPC - Steel Making - EAF Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
K Seeking help in making a decision - Project behind schedule Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 11
Q Making a Dashboard for the KPI of our department Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
F Making a REACH statement - Plastic Injection Moulding RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 9
W What are the Rules for making Organograms? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
AnaMariaVR2 Office Prank - Making an Office Disappear Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 0
Wes Bucey Making the case to the C-level suite Career and Occupation Discussions 1
M Trepanning Operation for making inner and outer races of bearings Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
Wes Bucey "Making the case" & Networking - Do's & Don't's Career and Occupation Discussions 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom