Q
We publish inputs to management review quarterly. Our top management wants to hold review meetings to decide upon outputs. My cynical side says this is so he does not have to read and take action on the inputs provided.
The problem is that when I begin to formulate an agenda for this meeting, I find that everything reported upon in our mgt review inputs are being discussed, measured and addressed elsewhere, ie. CAPA's, quality meetings, internal audits, mrb meetings, etc. so there really is nothing new to discuss except perhaps the quality policy and quality objectives.
While I am happy that we are addressing necessary improvements and needs when they occur and not just quarterly, this leaves me drawing a blank as to 1 - what to discuss in the meeting and 2 - what to publish as outputs.
I have read through the other threads and looked at the forms posted. All gave me ideas but none addressed what others do when management review inputs are just a summary of what is already being done!
Any suggestions?
The problem is that when I begin to formulate an agenda for this meeting, I find that everything reported upon in our mgt review inputs are being discussed, measured and addressed elsewhere, ie. CAPA's, quality meetings, internal audits, mrb meetings, etc. so there really is nothing new to discuss except perhaps the quality policy and quality objectives.
While I am happy that we are addressing necessary improvements and needs when they occur and not just quarterly, this leaves me drawing a blank as to 1 - what to discuss in the meeting and 2 - what to publish as outputs.
I have read through the other threads and looked at the forms posted. All gave me ideas but none addressed what others do when management review inputs are just a summary of what is already being done!
Any suggestions?
