A
Re: Management Review Frequency
I don't think frequency is the real problem. The problem might be following short term (monthly) fluctuations in graphs use for management review.
Think about posting graphs but not acting on them until there is a definate trend, positive or negative. Only then can a management team really know what the overall picture of the company is.
Maybe think about management review charts along the line of individuals charts, sure there is going to be large short term fluctuation but when that fluctuation is determined and corrective action is put in place to the charts can be converted to more conventional charts and really used as a tool by mamagement to help control the business processes.
tschones said:
I'm curious, how often does your organization perform its management review of the quality system? We perform ours monthly, which I argue is too frequent because we don't scrutinize the data well enough and there's a tendency to focus on short-term fluctuations of the graphs.
I'm curious, how often does your organization perform its management review of the quality system? We perform ours monthly, which I argue is too frequent because we don't scrutinize the data well enough and there's a tendency to focus on short-term fluctuations of the graphs.
Think about posting graphs but not acting on them until there is a definate trend, positive or negative. Only then can a management team really know what the overall picture of the company is.
Maybe think about management review charts along the line of individuals charts, sure there is going to be large short term fluctuation but when that fluctuation is determined and corrective action is put in place to the charts can be converted to more conventional charts and really used as a tool by mamagement to help control the business processes.
