Hi,
Just curious how others manage regression testing for design changes relative to their original design verification protocol/report.
For example, a design change is assessed to affect tests #1, 2, 3 on DVT protocol so we want to repeat those tests to document the results following design change. Do you leave protocol as-is (no revision) and revise test report with new results? If so do you maintain the original results in addition to the new results? And where do you document some background on the design change?
Alternatively I've seen use of addendum reports (keep original report as-is, add standalone addendum report to document new results) as well as entirely new protocol/report to describe the change and subset of testing to be performed/results. To me it seems each has its upside and downside so curious to know how others manage this and what they've found to be best.
Thanks
Just curious how others manage regression testing for design changes relative to their original design verification protocol/report.
For example, a design change is assessed to affect tests #1, 2, 3 on DVT protocol so we want to repeat those tests to document the results following design change. Do you leave protocol as-is (no revision) and revise test report with new results? If so do you maintain the original results in addition to the new results? And where do you document some background on the design change?
Alternatively I've seen use of addendum reports (keep original report as-is, add standalone addendum report to document new results) as well as entirely new protocol/report to describe the change and subset of testing to be performed/results. To me it seems each has its upside and downside so curious to know how others manage this and what they've found to be best.
Thanks