Manufacturer address on the label

monoj mon

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hi All,

I tried to find whether this exact issue has been discussed here previously or not, but couldn't find an answer which match with my current question. So decided to start a new discussion thread.

We have two facilities in the same country, Facility A and Facility B separated by nearly few hundred km and they are within driving distance. The Facility A is our head office where all the administrative activities are being done and is also the owner operator in the registration listing. However, Facility B is our manufacturing plant where we manufacture, sterilize, package and ship all our products. For all our devices to be distributed worldwide, we put the address of Facility A as a "Manufacturer" on the label as well as in the market authorization applications such as CE, 510(k) etc. But, we definitely mention about Facility B in those regulatory applications as the facility where all the devices are manufactured, sterilized and packaged. Also, in the GUDID we have identified the Facility A as a manufacturer and included its DUNS number. But, in the registration/listing website we have clearly defined functions of both the facilities as "Facility A - Specification Developer" and "Facility B-Manufacturer". So, in summary, for the customer and end user, Facility A is legally bound for everything and will be responsible for anything related to the device whereas the device is actually manufactured in Facility B and it "will get" audited/inspected by regulatory authorities.

Facility B is very new and yet to receive any inspection. So, does this labeling scenario and regulatory pathway make sense and is it an appropriate pathway! Will it be a misbranding!OR does this make Facility A to change from "Manufacturer" to "Manufactured for" on the label! Or should we just put the address of the Facility B where the devices are physically manufactured?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

shimonv

Trusted Information Resource
#2
The regulatory pathway makes sense although it's a little convoluted.
You could also consider putting Facility A as the legal manufacturer for all purposes and intend, and treat Facility B as a critical supplier /sub-contract site that need not be mentioned on the IFU or system label. In this pathway you may only need to make the distinction in the GUDID and/or FDA listing information.

Let's see what others can contribute to the discussion.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#4
Hi All,

I tried to find whether this exact issue has been discussed here previously or not, but couldn't find an answer which match with my current question. So decided to start a new discussion thread.

We have two facilities in the same country, Facility A and Facility B separated by nearly few hundred km and they are within driving distance. The Facility A is our head office where all the administrative activities are being done and is also the owner operator in the registration listing. However, Facility B is our manufacturing plant where we manufacture, sterilize, package and ship all our products. For all our devices to be distributed worldwide, we put the address of Facility A as a "Manufacturer" on the label as well as in the market authorization applications such as CE, 510(k) etc. But, we definitely mention about Facility B in those regulatory applications as the facility where all the devices are manufactured, sterilized and packaged. Also, in the GUDID we have identified the Facility A as a manufacturer and included its DUNS number. But, in the registration/listing website we have clearly defined functions of both the facilities as "Facility A - Specification Developer" and "Facility B-Manufacturer". So, in summary, for the customer and end user, Facility A is legally bound for everything and will be responsible for anything related to the device whereas the device is actually manufactured in Facility B and it "will get" audited/inspected by regulatory authorities.

Facility B is very new and yet to receive any inspection. So, does this labeling scenario and regulatory pathway make sense and is it an appropriate pathway! Will it be a misbranding!OR does this make Facility A to change from "Manufacturer" to "Manufactured for" on the label! Or should we just put the address of the Facility B where the devices are physically manufactured?
Please clarify. You are talking about two facilities, but are these facilities part of the same company or not?
And also important - Do both sites operate under one QMS, or each have their own QMS?
 

monoj mon

Involved In Discussions
#6
The regulatory pathway makes sense although it's a little convoluted.
You could also consider putting Facility A as the legal manufacturer for all purposes and intend, and treat Facility B as a critical supplier /sub-contract site that need not be mentioned on the IFU or system label. In this pathway you may only need to make the distinction in the GUDID and/or FDA listing information.

Let's see what others can contribute to the discussion.
Thank you for your reply and valuable input. Facility A is indeed mentioned everywhere else (except for the registration listing purpose) as the legal manufacturer. I am just curious will it be appropriate if we mention Facility B as the critical supplier/sub-contract site as both the facilities are under the name of same company, only difference is that they are located in different cities.
 

monoj mon

Involved In Discussions
#9
The same QMS could have two or more different scope statements.
Thanks John. In our QMS both the facilities are clearly mentioned and their activities are clearly identified. My question is "will it be appropriate if we mention Facility A (the head office) as the manufacturer on the labeling even though the Facility B is the actual manufacturing site!". Also repeating here for clarification, both the facilities are part of same company with identical names under same QMS and management. Only difference is that they are situated in two different cities in the same country.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#10
My question is "will it be appropriate if we mention Facility A (the head office) as the manufacturer on the labeling even though the Facility B is the actual manufacturing site!"
In my opinion, yes, it will be appropriate.
When you are being audited make sure to highlight to the auditing entity upfront that the sites are quite far apart; be ready to welcome audit of both sites on the same occasion (maybe different days of the same week); and willing to accept extra charges caused by such separation.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
I Importer Address in addition to Manufacturer details on label EU Medical Device Regulations 13
K Implant Card - Full Manufacturer's Address - Space issues EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Can we put two Manufacturer's address in IFU (Instructions For Use)? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
S Product Shelf Life - Plastics manufacturer - Cited for no system to address AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 17
I Is the contract mfg. mentioned in legal manufacturer EC certificate? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
S Can a Contract Manufacturer "release" product on behalf of client to the market? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
K 510K new manufacturer but same components Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
A Legal Manufacturer Medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
F How to register class I device to all European Competent Autorities(CA) when we are European manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Q Legal Manufacturer OTC Drug Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
R FCC certification (contract manufacturer) TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 1
A Interpretation of GMP Requirements for class 1 medical device manufacturer (device GMP exempt, only General controls applicable) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
A Legal Manufacturer of a medical device Vs Legal Manufacturer of MDSW EU Medical Device Regulations 7
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
H MDD CM, MDR manufacturer. 2020. Is it ok? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
C FDA Establishment registration - Buying some medical devices from another manufacturer Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
R Impact of changing manufacturer post clinical investigation CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
N Competent Authority notification for non-EU manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 4
N Updating the website of the manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Supply Agreement Regarding MDR 2017/745 - Manufacturer-supplier cooperation Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
A MDR Article 22 applicability - Legal manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 6
samarth IVD manufacturer and service provider ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
M Contract manufacturer MDR Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
J Complaints and not the legal manufacturer? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 20
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Is Harmonised EN 1041 (Information Supplied By Manufacturer) Worth Looking At? EU Medical Device Regulations 7
D Are we the manufacturer or relabeler? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
D Manufacturer's agreement with their EU Authorized Representative EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M Informational EU – Manufacturer incident report (MIR) for serious incident- template 2020 (Directives and new regulations) version 7.2 and related documents Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
A OEM branding - My interpretation of the LVD Directive makes us a manufacturer CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
K Reporting a Change of Contract Manufacturer for a 510(k) cleared device Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
J FDA Establishment Registration Foreign Manufacturer RUO only 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
G QMS requirements for legal manufacturer when outsourcing manufacturing process Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 23
J IVD CE transfer to another manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Private Label Requirements, Manufacturer's Registration & Initial Importers 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
I Reducing CE marking cost using manufacturer test reports CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
O Identifying KPI for AS9100 8.1.4 - Prevention of Counterfeit Parts - PCB assembly contract manufacturer AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 16
J COC (Certificate of Conformity) when NOT purchasing medical devices direct from the Manufacturer Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
J US Manufacturer of Export Only Exempt Products applying for CFG 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
C Can a manufacturer (in South of Korea) have multiple Brazil Registration Holder (BRH) for same brend name? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
C What if the foreign manufacturer of a medical device changes the Authorized Representative in Saudi Arabia? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
M Medical Device Master File - We are a contract manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
I 2017/745 (MDR) - Instruction for use (IFU) - manufacturer's website EU Medical Device Regulations 11
M Medical devices as an accessory from another manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 2
B Roles of Manufacturer vs. Importer vs. Distributor CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
JoCam Medical Device Recalls - Manufacturer's obligation for covering cost EU Medical Device Regulations 17
D Software Validation - Contract manufacturer of Components (PCBA's) Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 7
S ISO 13485 scope of certification - We are a virtual manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
V "Manufacturer Symbol on Device is missed due to space constraint" EU requirement EU Medical Device Regulations 11
R Publication of user information in manufacturer website for medical devices Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom