Manufacturing without Procedures and Work Instructions

E

Eloy Gomez

#1
Aside from the documented procedures that are required by AS9100 & ISO standards management is thinking about getting rid of our procedures and work instructions.

We have so many procedures and WI that are outdated, useless and do not reflect our current processes.

My concern is that when audited by our customer or 3rd party audits how should we respond to the auditor when he ask how do we know what we are doing? Could this be a finding if we dont have procedure for example: Material Control or shipping?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Wes Bucey

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
Re: Manufacturing without procedures/Work Instructions

Aside from the documented procedures that are required by AS9100 & ISO standards management is thinking about getting rid of our procedures and work instructions.

We have so many procedures and WI that are outdated, useless and do not reflect our current processes.

My concern is that when audited by our customer or 3rd party audits how should we respond to the auditor when he ask how do we know what we are doing? Could this be a finding if we dont have procedure for example: Material Control or shipping?
Of course, you haven't provided the details of what exactly your management proposes to do. I strongly suspect they will not be so foolish as to throw the "baby out with the bathwater," but will make a sober review of each document and decide whether to

  1. keep as is
  2. revise
  3. discard completely
  4. create new ones to cover processes and procedures not previously documented
I recall a client company that did this and managed to discard work instructions for maintaining clutches on dock jeeps when they realized they had been using clutchless electric vehicles for nearly 3 years. Simultaneously, they discovered they had no maintenance protocol for the electric vehicles and so created one.

Spreading panic before the sky actually falls only makes you look like a genius if and when the sky DOES fall. Consider poor Chicken Little who interpreted an acorn as a piece of the sky.

The smart thing to do is say to a manager, "Wow! This is a great idea to go through our documentation about work instructions and to discard the obsolete ones, update existing ones, and write new ones. How can I help?"

That way, even if they weren't clever enough to realize "some" documentation needed to remain, you are NOT the one making them feel stupid because you imply they have already thought of that whether they had or not.
 
Last edited:
D

DrM2u

#3
Re: Manufacturing without procedures/Work Instructions

:agree1: Great advice from Wes about reviewing your documnetation needs!:applause:

As far as how to respond to the auditors ... Describe to them then show them what you do (walk the process). You have nothing to worry about as long as the processes are effective, effcient and compliant with all applicable requirements. If anyone asks why there is no documentation then demonstrate that there is enough knowledge on how to perform a process/task without a documented aid (again, show them). Any documented finding should be against a documented requirement and supported by OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. I encourage you to dispute any whimsical findings because often times they can be more detrimental than benneficial. As far as identified opportunities, give them some thought and act only on the ones that seem of value. Hope this helps.
 

Big Jim

Super Moderator
#4
Aside from the documented procedures that are required by AS9100 & ISO standards management is thinking about getting rid of our procedures and work instructions.

We have so many procedures and WI that are outdated, useless and do not reflect our current processes.

My concern is that when audited by our customer or 3rd party audits how should we respond to the auditor when he ask how do we know what we are doing? Could this be a finding if we dont have procedure for example: Material Control or shipping?
How do you respond to "how do we know what we are doing?"? You can respond with "because we have been trained".
 

Pancho

wikineer
Super Moderator
#6
Aside from the documented procedures that are required by AS9100 & ISO standards management is thinking about getting rid of our procedures and work instructions.

We have so many procedures and WI that are outdated, useless and do not reflect our current processes.

My concern is that when audited by our customer or 3rd party audits how should we respond to the auditor when he ask how do we know what we are doing? Could this be a finding if we dont have procedure for example: Material Control or shipping?
Eloy,

Getting rid of obsolete documents is clearly desirable for any organization, but it is not desirable to rely on improvisation for consistent quality. To decide whether to get rid of or rewrite documentation, I'd consider the following questions:

How many people involved in each process? The more people involved in a process, the less likely that not having written documentation is the right solution.

What is the personnel rotation like? New workers must be trained consistently. Also, as older workers retire, you lose their knowledge unless you have captured it in documentation.

Why were the documents written in the first place? If the documents were created for the purpose of getting the registration, then it is likely they were useless from the beginning. If they were written as useful documentation and they later became obsolete, then you have a problem of document control.

Are our processes mature? If your processes are changing, or if you want to improve them, then documentation is the best way to go. From your description it seems to me that your processes do change.



Minimizing documentation may be appealing, but if your organization needs the documentation, then it is inappropriate. To avoid obsolescence in documents, they should be living things. Users of a document must be able to effect (or at least initiate) change in it easily.

Hope you find what works for your company and good luck!

Pancho
 
Last edited:

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#7
Getting rid of obsolete documents is clearly desirable for any organization, but it is not desirable to rely on improvisation for consistent quality.
While I agree with this idea, it has two sides. Documentation is often used to inhibit or prohibit improvisation, even when improvisation is necessary (and sometimes it is). An extreme example:

In 1998, at the large Chicago hospital where both of my kids were born, a shooting victim died on the doorstep of the emergency room. His companions had gone inside to get help, but doctors and nurses wouldn't go outside because there was a rule in place that prohibited them (while on the clock) from treating patients outside the doors of the hospital. This brings new meaning to the phrase, "The operation was a success (the rules were followed) but the patient died."

There are times when procedures must be rigidly followed, because experience has taught us that if "B" is done before "A," something bad will happen. There are other times, though, when unforeseen circumstances arise and the potential consequences change such that doing "B" before "A" will forestall something even worse. Sometimes we have to allow people to make decisions and not be inhibited by the documentation.

In the OP's case, it seems clear that there's a lot of documentation that's been neglected and allowed to accumulate. As others have suggested, the solution is not to just throw everything out, but to cull the herd, so to speak, and do a better job of maintenance of the system.
 
D

DrM2u

#8
There are times when procedures must be rigidly followed, because experience has taught us that if "B" is done before "A," something bad will happen. There are other times, though, when unforeseen circumstances arise and the potential consequences change such that doing "B" before "A" will forestall something even worse. Sometimes we have to allow people to make decisions and not be inhibited by the documentation.
:agree1:I have to agree with Jim on this one. Over-standardization, over-simplification and over-documentation can diminish the human ability to think (gather information, analyze and decide), let alone to apply logical thinking. It brings up the what-if question 'can I get a monkey to do this if I create enought prompts?'. The best example of this ignorance for the human ability to think was the assembly lines developed by Ford with Taylor's guidance in the middle of last century (I won't elaborate, research it for yourselves).
 
J

JaneB

#9
Lots of good advice already given.

I would focus on not throwing out the 'baby with the bathwater'. Strip it back, yes, get rid of excess/redundant etc, yes, but 'just chuck it all except the mandatory ones' isn't necessarily the best approach. The advice from Wes and Pancho and Jim is very sound.
My concern is that when audited by our customer or 3rd party audits how should we respond to the auditor when he ask how do we know what we are doing? Could this be a finding if we dont have procedure for example: Material Control or shipping?
Never forget that it's a system - documentation is a part of the system, but not the be-all and end-all. So focus on the various other aspects as well, including personnel competency (you know, how you specify what these are in PDs and the like, and select/train people so as to make sure they are), management planning, overseeing and reviewing what's going on, defined processes (processes can be defined without having to be documented) etc. Sometimes the answer to 'how do you know' is almost too obvious, so spend a bit of time thinking about it.

I know here, for example, in a firm that employs only qualified tradespeople, they come in already knowing how to do many things (that's why they're qualified tradies!) which means WIs and certain procedures just aren't required.

But yes, great idea to strip back. That will allow you to focus on what IS required and what might be missing/unclear at the moment.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
V Manufacturing without a Formal Drawing ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
M Product Realisation without manufacturing ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Y Recommended for Certification - R&D only (without Manufacturing or Marketing)! ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
J Lean Manufacturing without stability - Rate it 1 to 5. Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 4
S CE and Manufacturing license Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
S Manufacturing Process FDA FOIA Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
S Manufacturing Process FDA FOIA US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
S Critical characteristic on manufacturing operations test procedure Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
P ISO 8 classified medical manufacturing room Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
P How to measure DPPM in Chemical batch manufacturing Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
M MSA Study Type 1 not capable. We are at the limit. And manufacturing wants to continue producing. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
J Calibration cycle for monitoring & measuring tools used in medical device manufacturing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
M Office and manufacturing site relocation effect on Device Technical File CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
lanley liao How to keep the manufacturing capability under the API monogram Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
O Any info on release date of FDA “Computer Software Assurance for Manufacturing and Quality System Software” document? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
Ed Panek What are the limits on manufacturing changes and substantial changes? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
Z Rapid audit template for plastic parts manufacturing process Manufacturing and Related Processes 12
P IQ, OQ, PQ protocol, and report templates for Distributed Control Systems in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Systems. Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 0
K One CE Mark holder - multiple manufacturing sites EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M Indian Medical Device Rules - Manufacturing and Wholesale Lic. Required? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 12
R Manufacturing plants relocation - Medical Device Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 7
R Medical Device - Change manufacturing plant Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
P New Global HQ Suggestions for Virtual manufacturing/own brand labelling of medical devices? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Manufacturing Execution Systems Software Costs Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
P Managing How PPAP Requirements are Communicated in the Manufacturing Process and to Suppliers APQP and PPAP 5
J Control Plan use on the manufacturing floor FMEA and Control Plans 4
S PSW - Requirements for "off-the shelf" component that has multiply manufacturing locations Off the Shelf Item Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
DuncanGibbons Additive Manufacturing Processes Thread Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
S Can assembly manufacturing sub-supplier be certified IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
A ISO 14971 PFMEA Manufacturing Risk ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
L Manufacturing Process Audit Help IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
H Line Balancing in Backpack Manufacturing Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
DuncanGibbons Resources for aiding in procedure, work instruction and manufacturing plan development and management AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
L SAE AS9145 vs. SAE AS6500 (Manufacturing Management Program) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
Watchcat Best Regulatory Oversight for Off-Shore Device Manufacturing? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
DuncanGibbons Manufacturing Plan vs Material Specification vs Control Plan Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
qualprod Automation in manufacturing - Print Shop ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
N Address of Legal Manufacturing Site in ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
M Description of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.3 manufacturing process audit- needs your feedback IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
M Operational (free) simulation games for manufacturing and quality Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 5
V Manufacturing requirements for respiratory ventilators - clean room required? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
J Guidance on manufacturing non-surgical face masks US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
P Manufacturing equipment (e.g.: Dental Welder): medical device or not? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
S Contagious Diseases in Medical Device Manufacturing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
C Manufacturing overages & nonconforming material documentation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Z US Manufacturing Site Closing, device manufactured elsewhere Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
L Manufacturing site expansion - When to notify your NB EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Q Legal Manufacturing Address Change – multiple registrations at same address 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
N China - Start manufacturing before change approval? China Medical Device Regulations 3
J Manufacturing procedure / work instruction depth ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12

Similar threads

Top Bottom