Material Dispositioned for Scrap Positively Controlled - AS9100 Clause 8.3

phxsun2001

Involved - Posts
#1
I found a rack of 10 parts dispositioned seperately for scrap in production area with paperwork next to the parts. These parts were dispositioned 1 to 7 months ago They were not painted red or permanently marked. Anyone could get one of the parts and process it. They met the ISO9001 standard because they were identified and segregated.

For AS9100, the requirement is:

Is product dispositioned for scrap conspicuously and permanently marked, or positively controlled, until physically rendered unusable?

I consider this a nonconformance because they are not positively controlled. One auditor agreed with me and one auditor thinks that it is an observation. What do you think. How do you Interpret "Positively controlled".

TY
 
Last edited:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Randy

Super Moderator
#2
Back at ya with this one.....How is "Positive Control" defined by your system/organization.

If the parts meet your definition, no problem, if they don't then you have a non-fulfillment of a requirement. If you have not defined "Positive Control" the problem is a lack of definition and not the control...yet.
 

phxsun2001

Involved - Posts
#3
"Positive Control" is not well defined in the company procedures. The N/C material in production just need to be identified and segregated, according to a flow chart.

TY
 
Last edited:

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
#4
I found a rack of 10 parts dispositioned seperately for scrap in production area with paperwork next to the parts. These parts were dispositioned 1 to 7 months ago They were not painted red or permanently marked. Anyone could get one of the parts and process it. They met the ISO9001 standard because they were identified and segregated.

For AS9100, the requirement is:

Is product dispositioned for scrap conspicuously and permanently marked, or positively controlled, until physically rendered unusable?

I consider this a nonconformance because they are not positively controlled. One auditor agreed with me and one auditor thinks that it is an observation. What do you think. How do you Interpret "Positively controlled".

TY
I don't audit regularly in AS9100, but did pass the certification training a few years ago. Per the training, it was emphasized that the intent is to ensure the NC parts cannot be used (accidently or intentionally) due to the risks involved. Destroyed, ground, crushed, cut up, etc. The situation you describe definitely sounds like a nonconformance. You should also verify what the internal and customer or FAR requirements say about it. You should find your justification for a nonconformance.

The intent was much more stringent than the standard ISO 9001 requirement.
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#5
"Positive Control" is not well defined in the company procedures. The N/C material in production just need to be identified and segregated, according to a flow chart.

TY

There lies your possible problem....a poorly designed process lacking clearly defined definitions. However if you can demonstrate adequate control with the existing procedure then it would not be a problem.

Ya gotta identify what must be done, develop a way to do it, actually do it and provide evidence that is being effectively accomplished.
 
A

andygr

#6
Since you are under an AS9100 system there is one upstream stake holder that has strong concerns on this subject.

Here is some the of FAA check list questions that the procedure and practice would need to address.
Does the manual contain procedures for segregation of repairable from non- repairable articles?
Does the manual include a procedure for tagging or identifying articles, including repairable and non-repairable articles?

As long as the paper work next to the parts is the way the system states part acceptability is maintained and this paper work identifies the part status you have positive control. Could you improve? probably but if you never have had an escape then this should be no more than an observation at this time.
If the paper work was not with the parts or did not correctly identify their status then I would lean to issuing a finding.
:2cents:
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#7
Speaking from personal experience the situation you describe is a non conformance under AS9100 regardless of your own procedures. positive control is generally taken to mean identified and quarantined in a locked area that has limited access. The intent is to have a high level of confidence that all material dispositioned as scrap does not get used either inadvertantly or intentionally. (of course if the perpetrator is bound and determined they can get through a locked door - which is why the emphasis is really on permanent alteration of the part as soon as the material is dispositioned as scrap)

The aerospace industry takes this very seriously and it woudl in all probability result in a major NC and quite a tongue lashing form your SQE...

I walked into this very problem exactly as you described it shortly after being hired by an AS9100 supplier...not fun. depending on other current and past issues you could have have your self release status revoked as well....
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#8
The aerospace industry takes this very seriously and it woudl in all probability result in a major NC and quite a tongue lashing form your SQE...
:thanx:Spot on.

No wonder the Aerospace Industry is concerned with the effectiveness of audits performed by CB's. Playing with words, creating artificial definitions of positive control is ludicrous. So, if the company in question had defined "positive control" as parts will be in the open rack, with their paperwork nearby (as in the described situation), would that satisfy the intent of positive control? Obviously not.

The situation, as described, is a CLEAR violation of the AS9100 requirement and I would categorize it as a Major nonconformity. We don't want parts waiting to be mutilated, or scrapped, to turn into bogus hardware floating in the black market. NC parts laying around for 7 months!

Observation? Give me a break!:mad:
Gutless auditors need to be shown the door out of the ICOP system...The Aviation, Space & Defense sectors don't need that kind of cowardice.
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#9
Yeah, I agree but the term "Positive Control" is subjective. I think it should be defined and demonstrated as effective....I've seen stuff tagged and locked up in a cage and still appear magically.

I got to work for a short time in a "Red Line Brig" back when they existed. We didn't have cell doors....we had a Red Line on the floor. The prisoners were under positive control because of what would happen if they crossed the line. No one did that I recall. (Kinda like the movie "Support Your Local Sheriff" except this was for real).
 

phxsun2001

Involved - Posts
#10
The argument used by this company was that these parts are serialized and it is impossible for these part to get into the production system by mistake. Their system is tight enough to control these parts without physical controls like using paint or locked area.

There are thousand of parts that goes into the final product and a lot of them are not serialized. It may be OK for these parts, but what about the parts that are not serialized? Their procedure does not address it.

The lead auditor thinks that it is acceptable. He did write a minor nonconformance against their procedure for not painting the parts for setup pieces. So the company will paint these part red, provides some training records and that would be the end of it. In the mean time there is still a hole in their QMS.

TY
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
DuncanGibbons Manufacturing Plan vs Material Specification vs Control Plan Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Jane's Like-for-like critical raw material change qualification - type of testing/ number of lots required ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
L AS5553 Clause 3.1.7 e "Control packaging material ..................reused" AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 0
J Raw material certificates - CC - Safety products - Sheet metal stamping IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
C Manufacturing overages & nonconforming material documentation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Changing supplier of critical raw material (III class device) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
I Where can I beg, steal (just kidding of course) or borrow good training material on the ISO 9001:2015 standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
DMLqms Material for laboratory use or Medical Device? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
C Material from outside CER evaluation period CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
F AS9100D, raw material standards are a requirement for manufacturing? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5
6 Management of SDS and Hazardous Material Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
L Cba biomedical auditor - cba primer material is enough to study? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
DuncanGibbons Are there any aerospace specific requirements for material resource planning? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 1
T Was Just told we could ONLY buy material for AS9100 customers if the DISTRIBUTION house is AS9100 / AS9120 AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
C Clean room injection molding, raw material mixing requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
C Raw material Mixing / Preparation for clean room class C injection molding Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
P GM TWO (Temporary Work Order) - Is there a specific GM format for the TWO# to be sent with the material? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
R ASQ reference material clarification - Spiral bound materials allowed in ASQ Exam? Professional Certifications and Degrees 1
Manix Supplied Steel Material Testing Norms and Requirements Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
R Material safety data sheet (MSDS) related clause in IATF 16949 manual IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17
K Interpretation of significant change - material change Canada Medical Device Regulations 3
M Raw stock material testing discrepancy using an XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analyzer Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
W Scope of MRB (Material Review Board) Responsibilities Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
M Conformal Coating & AS9102 - Is conformal coating material a COTS part AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 8
M Maximum Height for the stored material or stock materials Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
F Mig Welded Components - IMDS International Material Data System RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 1
K ISO 9001 Requirements for Raw Material Supplier Assessment and Approval ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
R Customer supplied material - risk and policy advice needed Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 11
P Material selection - How do we select a raw material? Bolt made of SAE J994 grade 2 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
Q Does our material suppliers’ supplier have to be at least ISO 9001 certified? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
N PPAP material certificate date IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
J Steps when changing material for class 1 medical device 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
Y How to fix weight tolerance for plastic injection molded part? Does it vary with material groups? Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
Rameshwar25 What is a Control Plan at "Material Level"? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
M ASTM A6 Material Standard - Section Nominal Sizes Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
L Does anybody have quiz's available? ISO 13485:2016 Training Material Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
D Raw Material chemical/Tensile Requirements Specifications (QQ-A-250/4, etc) AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 3
M Are Medical device Raw material suppliers required to be ISO 13485 certified ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
S MRB (Material Review Board) Investigations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D DFARS (Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement) Raw Material Information Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 1
Q Do we have to prove a link between the mill and our raw material supplier? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 9
C Will anyone please share training material for ISO:13485:2016 for best practices Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
C Approval of raw material suppliers which do not manufacture the material ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
Sidney Vianna Support & Guidance Material for ISO 14001:2015 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 0
H IMDS for material - Can my Customer create one for my material? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 4
D CAPA vs. Risk Assessment - Changing a product material for better performance ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
T IMDS - Creating an MDS out of material and a made item? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 4
N IMDS Warning Polymer Material Two Substances RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 7
Q ISO 19011 - Looking for a Presentation Material Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 6
A Decontamination of Site returned Material ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom