SBS - The best value in QMS software

MDR and IVDR to be published May 5th 2017

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

bio_subbu

Super Moderator
#2

Attachments

Yasuaki

Starting to get Involved
#4
Its Article 123 says,
"It shall apply from 26 May 2020."

We must start busy years, because of not only MDSAP but also MDR.
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#5
The new regulation's entry into force is 20 days after publication, initiating the transition period when both the directive and the new regulations will be applicable.

The 26 May 2020 date is (more or less) when only the new regulation will be left.

The transition period is a little different from the usual, there's a lot of rules that have to be followed. There's several types of devices that in practice won't be able to wait until 2020 (or the other extension).
 

L_O_B

Involved In Discussions
#8
I have heard several customers over the last years asking for a gap analysis and here is what I told them:

A gap analysis between MDD and MDR is a lot of work for almost no benefit.

The MDR contains a lot of information and by far not everything has an impact on economical operators.
-> so filter what is important for your business

The MDR contains a lot of requirements, which were already part of (harmonised) standards (e.g. ISO EN 13485:2016, ISO EN 14971:2012, ISO EN 14155:2011) or guidances (e.g. MEDDEV 2.7/1)
-> I guess most of the people here work in companies, which are already producing/selling devices. The main pillars of regulatory compliance are:
Risk Management
Usability
Clinical Evaluation
Labeling
Post-market surveillance
and all this should be part of a working quality management system.
This is nothing new but the status how it already should be.
So in order to comply with the MDR, instead of torturing yourself through articles about how frequently the MDCG shall meet or how the commission shall establish the interface of Eudamed (and also searching for equivalences in the MDD for that), it may be smarter to check for gaps between what you already have established and what the MDR requires.
Additionally, if you have already or are about to implement standards like ISO 13485:2016 or IEC 62366-1, you would have twice the work (first the gap analysis between MDR and MDD; second the gap analysis between standard and MDR).
The technical documentation is another good example for this. The MDD has almost no requirements on the format of the technical documentation. So people decided to use templates like STeD. If you use such a template, where is the benefit in comparing MDD and MDR requirements on this topic.

There are sections where a gap analysis between MDR and MDD might help (general safety and performance requirements <-> essential requirements), but for the whole document this is not helpful

The MDR is no MDD 2.0.
 

nozzle

Involved In Discussions
#10
I have heard several customers over the last years asking for a gap analysis and here is what I told them:

A gap analysis between MDD and MDR is a lot of work for almost no benefit.

The MDR contains a lot of information and by far not everything has an impact on economical operators.
-> so filter what is important for your business

The MDR contains a lot of requirements, which were already part of (harmonised) standards (e.g. ISO EN 13485:2016, ISO EN 14971:2012, ISO EN 14155:2011) or guidances (e.g. MEDDEV 2.7/1)
-> I guess most of the people here work in companies, which are already producing/selling devices. The main pillars of regulatory compliance are:
Risk Management
Usability
Clinical Evaluation
Labeling
Post-market surveillance
and all this should be part of a working quality management system.
This is nothing new but the status how it already should be.
So in order to comply with the MDR, instead of torturing yourself through articles about how frequently the MDCG shall meet or how the commission shall establish the interface of Eudamed (and also searching for equivalences in the MDD for that), it may be smarter to check for gaps between what you already have established and what the MDR requires.
Additionally, if you have already or are about to implement standards like ISO 13485:2016 or IEC 62366-1, you would have twice the work (first the gap analysis between MDR and MDD; second the gap analysis between standard and MDR).
The technical documentation is another good example for this. The MDD has almost no requirements on the format of the technical documentation. So people decided to use templates like STeD. If you use such a template, where is the benefit in comparing MDD and MDR requirements on this topic.

There are sections where a gap analysis between MDR and MDD might help (general safety and performance requirements <-> essential requirements), but for the whole document this is not helpful

The MDR is no MDD 2.0.

Thanks for taking the time to reply.
We received a major non-conformance from our NB last week as we don't have a procedure for conducting clinical evaluation. The company have never been cited for this in the past, do you have an example procedure?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Informational EU – Corrigenda for MDR and IVDR published in Official Journal Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Medical Device News New guidance sheets for the MDR/IVDR published EU Medical Device Regulations 0
bio_subbu CAMD published FAQs to the transitional provisions of MDR and IVDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
P MDR/IVDR Annex III - Technical documentation on PMS EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational EU – Guidance on Qualification and Classification of Software in Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – MDR and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 – IVDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
dgrainger Informational MDCG 2019-11: Guidance on Qualification and Classification of Software in Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – MDR and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 – IVDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Watchcat MDD, MDR/IVDR, Working Groups, Expert Panels, MEDDEVs and Other EU Guidances EU Medical Device Regulations 32
M Informational Update – MDR and IVDR implementing measures rolling plan – 2 more NBs designated under the new regulations Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational From RAPS – EU MDR/IVDR: US Raises ‘Serious Concerns,’ Urges 3-Year Implementation Delay Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
M Informational EU – MDCG 2019-7 Guidance on Article 15 of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and in vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation (IVDR) regarding a “person re Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 7
M Informational Medtech Europe presentation – – Industry Perspective on the Implementation Status of the MDR/IVDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational EU MDR and IVDR Factsheet for healthcare professionals and health institutions Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational From RAPS – UK NB Will Not Apply for EU MDR/IVDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 11
M Informational Next meeting of the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDR/IVDR) – 20 June 2019 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Informational EU – April 2019 update of the MDR and IVDR implementing measures rolling plan Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Medical Device News EU – Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR) – infographics Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Medical Device News Last update of the MDR and IVDR implementing measures rolling plan – December 2018 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Manufacturer Incident Report (MIR) for Serious Incidents (MDR/IVDR) and Incidents (MDD/IMDD/IVDD) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
J IVDR and MDR ANNEX I Requirements Template EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M Medical Device News MDR and IVDR implementing measures rolling plan EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S MDR & IVDR Introduction in late May 2017 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Re-packaging under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Ed Panek Upcoming NB MDD ---> MDR Crunch EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S MDR - System and procedure pack article 22 and all sub processes that apply ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
C Requirements for distributors under MDR: translation EU Medical Device Regulations 0
A Should we assign the PRRC before the date of application of MDR (26 May 2021)? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
N Looking for a recommendation for an EU MDR Importer EU Medical Device Regulations 1
JoCam Rental and MDD versus MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A Can anyone share a Distribution Agreement template under MDR 2017/745? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
A MDR ANNEX XI part A or Part B EU Medical Device Regulations 0
N OBL under the MDR. Which are the obligations of the OEM? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
U Distributor obligations under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Raisin picker CECP, consultation according to Art 54 MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Question on MDR classification EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M STED vs MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
F UDI-PI required on packaging (MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Extension to shelf life of new product under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J Instructions for use for Class I devices under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K Importer in EU, but not distribute in the EU - MDR obligations EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K MDR Class 1 Self Certification - Competent Authority or Notified Body? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
M Responsibilities of Importers / Distributors - MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S PSUR - MDR First Submission Requirement? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
R EU-MDR Article 9-common specifications Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
JoCam Certified QMS for MDR - Class I medical device manufacturers EU Medical Device Regulations 4
JoCam MDR Gap Analysis - Consultant fees EU Medical Device Regulations 10
N Is there a need for clinical test of Class IIa products (for MDR)? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Examples of Combination Products - MDR Article 1 (8) and MDR Article 1(9) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
P EU MDR Translation of Product Name EU Medical Device Regulations 1
N Is this a single integral drug device combination product EU MDR CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
R Components to a finished medical device, MDR requirements Other US Medical Device Regulations 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom