I am tending to agree a bit more
I also enjoy the discussion.
I reviewed some more elements of Annex II and it seems it allows for some cherrypicking. If it would not, it would be very difficult to address everything.
I fully agree with your last opinion - if IFU is not supplied, there are not much requirements related to the content left.
About requests for IFU: This was an (old) explanation from our CA. Maybe this was their own interpretation as I cannot find anything relevant in the MDR. IFU ("as a document") is also mentioned in Annex II, 2 (it is expected in the tech file), but as you wrote, content if the IFU is only specified for cases where IFU is supplied. Maybe this route is the reason for all shady IFUs out there
Honestly, I never dived really deep in this topic as our products require an IFU in all cases. Thank you for this.
I reviewed some more elements of Annex II and it seems it allows for some cherrypicking. If it would not, it would be very difficult to address everything.
I fully agree with your last opinion - if IFU is not supplied, there are not much requirements related to the content left.
About requests for IFU: This was an (old) explanation from our CA. Maybe this was their own interpretation as I cannot find anything relevant in the MDR. IFU ("as a document") is also mentioned in Annex II, 2 (it is expected in the tech file), but as you wrote, content if the IFU is only specified for cases where IFU is supplied. Maybe this route is the reason for all shady IFUs out there
Honestly, I never dived really deep in this topic as our products require an IFU in all cases. Thank you for this.