MDR PMS System Vs. Plan Vs. Procedures

ThatSinc

Quite Involved in Discussions
#1
Hi All,

Slightly confused by the expectations for the PMS plan, as required by the MDR Article 84

The post-market surveillance system referred to in Article 83 shall be based on a post-market surveillance plan, the requirements for which are set out in ►C2 Section 1 of Annex III. ◄ For devices other than custom-made devices, the post-market surveillance plan shall be part of the technical documentation specified in Annex II.
Article 83 lays out that the PMS System shall be integral to the QMS

1. For each device, manufacturers shall plan, establish, document, implement, maintain and update a post-market surveillance system in a manner that is proportionate to the risk class and appropriate for the type of device. That system shall be an integral part of the manufacturer's quality management system referred to in Article 10(9).
If the PMS System shall be based on the plan, and the PMS System shall be integral to the QMS surely the hierarchal structure puts the plan at the top, defining what your requirements are, the system below it with all of the relevant processes and procedures that fulfil the system requirements, then the output of those processes is the PMS Report or PSUR, and any subsequent activities in accordance with the processes/procedures, based on the conclusions.


After reviewing the detail required by the PMS Plan as per Annex III, with a few specific examples, this seems to confirm the plan as a much higher level document than a per-device document.

(b) The post-market surveillance plan shall cover at least:
— effective and appropriate methods and tools to investigate complaints and analyse market-related experience collected in the field;
— methods and protocols to communicate effectively with competent authorities, notified bodies, economic operators and users;
— reference to procedures to fulfil the manufacturers obligations laid down in Articles 83, 84 and 86;
— systematic procedures to identify and initiate appropriate measures including corrective actions;

These all seem like very generic requirements that should be fulfilled by integrated into procedures within a business and then applied consistently as per the risk classification of the device in question.

If all of these have to be documented in a plan, for each device, surely it's nearly all going to be standard/static text for every single plan with the only part I can see as being unique to an individual device is any justification for no PMCF requirements.


I see very little value add in this, but would really like to understand how other people have managed this?

Am I missing something fundamental here?

Thanks

TS
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Tidge

Trusted Information Resource
#2
One place that I would expect this narrative to begin would be in a Risk Management Report for the medical device (or family of devices). It is common that the RMP contains:
  • The statement of risk acceptability for marketing the device
  • The links to the analyses supporting the acceptability decision
  • Plans for periodic review of risk acceptability (which ought to take inputs from the post-market surveillance system)
The periodic risk review could also include other activities not strictly related to "14971" risk, but if the review is going to include more diverse activities it will be necessary to have more diverse competencies as part of the review.

The "high level" (i.e. non-device specific) planning would likely be defining per procedure where the activities are to occur, as opposed to taking an ad hoc approach to trying to guarantee that they are done.
 

ThatSinc

Quite Involved in Discussions
#3
One place that I would expect this narrative to begin would be in a Risk Management Report for the medical device (or family of devices). It is common that the RMP contains:
That's precisely where it does begin
Currently remediating risk for a company going to MDR and as I was getting through the RMR I was trying to reference their PMS Plan, which in a previous life under MDD would have been a basic affair:

1. purpose
Gather PMS data and analyse in accordance with procedure XYZ
2. scope
Devices XYZ
3. frequency
Every X Years, based on XYZ
4. reporting
Report prepared using form XYZ


The procedure would capture everything you needed to do, what data to gather, how to analyse it and against what criteria (usually with reference to the risk process & CER process for acceptable risk, and acceptable performance, respectively)

However the documented requirements in the MDR seem like I'm going to be double documenting.
 

Junn1992

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
In my experience, there is definitely quite a bit of overlap between inputs for the Trend Report ( Article 88 ), PSUR, and PMCF. Just copy + paste and use the MDCG guidance format. MDCG 2020-7, MDCG 2020-8.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
P MDR/IVDR Annex III - Technical documentation on PMS EU Medical Device Regulations 2
D Hospital Decontamination and the MDR - Technical Files, UDI and PMS EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K EU MDR - PMS (Post Market Surveillance) SOP - definition of "register(s)" EU Medical Device Regulations 2
C Revising a DoC for a legacy device under MDR/IVDR transitional periods EU Medical Device Regulations 4
D MDR literature review on device without clinical claims EU Medical Device Regulations 7
B EU MDR transitional period extension EU Medical Device Regulations 4
I Classification of device per Annex 8 of the EU MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 4
R Class I devices in the extended MDR transition period EU Medical Device Regulations 17
A MDR- Technical Documents EU Medical Device Regulations 4
P Distribution of "CE" Declaration of conformity under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
E Expired CE with no pending MDR certification EU Medical Device Regulations 4
T SaMD labeling requirements - MDR IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 3
L Annex of ISO 13485:2016 as harmonized standard (MDR/IVDR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
P MDR Reporting Requirements for Devices Already covered in a correction under 21 CFR 806 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
M Clinical evaluation process of FDA and MDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
G MDR CE Expiration Date EU Medical Device Regulations 4
C MDR vs CMDR EU Medical Device Regulations 4
O MDR language requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 12
K Whether the product is an accessory according to the MDR definition EU Medical Device Regulations 3
L Adverse Event Reporting Flowchart (MDR EU) EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Doninina Trend Reporting for medical device class IIb according to MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Ed Panek MDR Delay? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
dgrainger Informational Proposal to address MDR challenges EU Medical Device Regulations 23
goldenguo MDR/IVDR Insurance and Liability for Manufacturers, EU Representative and Importer EU Medical Device Regulations 3
B MDR PSUR versus Canadian Summary report EU Medical Device Regulations 4
C MDR 2017/744 Article 22 EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K Sales of MDD devices with expired CE that are pending MDR certification EU Medical Device Regulations 4
D New Device Post Market Requirement for MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D EU MDR Derogation EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Doninina Risk management file according MDR or ISO 14971:P2019 ? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M On-demand EU MDR Compliance toolkit with online training courses, templates & document management system Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
M EU MDR (GSPR Checklist) consolidated with TGA EP Checklist EU Medical Device Regulations 5
A PMSR or PSUR for legacy MDD-class I becoming MDR class-IIa EU Medical Device Regulations 8
H MDR clinical evaluation EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Possible topic for Master thesis topic - MDR and QMS ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D MDR technical file: does it need to contain duplicates of controlled documents EU Medical Device Regulations 2
D Does the MDR article 10 (14) needs to be documented word for word in a Procedure? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
N Adding New Products during MDR transition period Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
L Internal Audits during the MDR Transition Period EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Z How to keep up with changes on applicable technical standards (EU MDR)? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
S OEM- Virtual Manufacturer contract MDR Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 0
J TGA CER & EU MDR CER Requirements for Australia Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
G MDR DRAFT DoC EU Medical Device Regulations 7
F MDR Distributor EU Medical Device Regulations 6
Y EU MDR Technical Documentation - Defined Review EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A Class 2b medical device - best pathway to obtain CE mark? (2022, MDR 2017/745) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
M Declaration of conformity MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 10
dgrainger Informational Manual on Borderline for MDR/IVDMDR EU Medical Device Regulations 6
G MDR Requirements for Samples EU Medical Device Regulations 5
C Applicability of classification rule 9 under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom