MDR requirement: Risk Management Plan for "each device"

adir88

Involved In Discussions
#1
Annex I Chapter I 3(a) clause states:
establish and document a risk management plan for each device
I've noticed in several articles online that emphasize "each device" in this requirement.

Is this a new MDR requirement? In our company we have risk management plans for product families (each family containing a different "model" of the device), so might have an impact to this approach under the MDR. Having said this, the Annex ZD in draft ISO 14971:20xx for this clause points to Subclause 4.4 of ISO 14971:20xx with a note "covered in respect of the process requirements". I understand there were comments on Z annexes which is why they weren't included in the 2019 publication, so this could change in the upcoming amendment.

So, my questions are:
1. Is this a new MDR requirement, and if so, what approaches are you taking as part of MDR transition?​
2. Can the product family be considered as "a device" given that they share the same intended use etc. including use specification?​
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#2
I think that no matter what responses you will get here, the only one that will carry any weight in this matter is your specific NB's one. That's where I'd go to.
 

Tidge

Quite Involved in Discussions
#3
So, my questions are:
1. Is this a new MDR requirement, and if so, what approaches are you taking as part of MDR transition?​
2. Can the product family be considered as "a device" given that they share the same intended use etc. including use specification?​
I agree that you will be at the mercy of your NB. My impression is that there are lower-hanging fruit for NB's to pick during at this time of transition rather than reaching for this specific issue, provided that a "family's" Risk Management Plan appropriately covers all members of the family. If your "wide" RM Plan clearly describes the products covered, and it has the necessary input/output mechanisms to other systems (e.g. CAPA, Complaints) I wouldn't spend effort trying to remediate those files simply as a preventative measure to possibly satisfy an external audit. If an NB auditor takes issue with your risk file, it is far more likely that it will be for some element which you haven't anticipated.

Writing only for myself, as an intellectual exercise: I would be interested to see how your file handles complaints/issues/CA/design changes for a single member of the family with respect to all the other members of the family. For example, do some members of the family get more complaints, and is the risk profile really the same for all members of the family? Are there different user groups and risk controls for different members of the family? Personally I would consider this to something of a "deep dive", but I can imagine getting to similar questions via something a simple as a review of complaints.
 

adir88

Involved In Discussions
#4
I agree that you will be at the mercy of your NB. My impression is that there are lower-hanging fruit for NB's to pick during at this time of transition rather than reaching for this specific issue, provided that a "family's" Risk Management Plan appropriately covers all members of the family. If your "wide" RM Plan clearly describes the products covered, and it has the necessary input/output mechanisms to other systems (e.g. CAPA, Complaints) I wouldn't spend effort trying to remediate those files simply as a preventative measure to possibly satisfy an external audit. If an NB auditor takes issue with your risk file, it is far more likely that it will be for some element which you haven't anticipated.

Writing only for myself, as an intellectual exercise: I would be interested to see how your file handles complaints/issues/CA/design changes for a single member of the family with respect to all the other members of the family. For example, do some members of the family get more complaints, and is the risk profile really the same for all members of the family? Are there different user groups and risk controls for different members of the family? Personally I would consider this to something of a "deep dive", but I can imagine getting to similar questions via something a simple as a review of complaints.
The individual products within each family do not have any differences with respect to user groups and risk controls which makes review of the risk management file due to complaints etc. very simple. I agree keeping the family plans as is in our current system unless requested by our NB.

Many thanks!
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#5
The individual products within each family do not have any differences with respect to user groups and risk controls which makes review of the risk management file due to complaints etc. very simple. I agree keeping the family plans as is in our current system unless requested by our NB.

Many thanks!
Probably better to be proactive and present the question to the NB upfront, rather than wait to audit day and risk a NC.
 
#6
Annex I Chapter I 3(a) clause states:


I've noticed in several articles online that emphasize "each device" in this requirement.

Is this a new MDR requirement? In our company we have risk management plans for product families (each family containing a different "model" of the device), so might have an impact to this approach under the MDR. Having said this, the Annex ZD in draft ISO 14971:20xx for this clause points to Subclause 4.4 of ISO 14971:20xx with a note "covered in respect of the process requirements". I understand there were comments on Z annexes which is why they weren't included in the 2019 publication, so this could change in the upcoming amendment.

So, my questions are:
1. Is this a new MDR requirement, and if so, what approaches are you taking as part of MDR transition?​
2. Can the product family be considered as "a device" given that they share the same intended use etc. including use specification?​
A product family as you described can utilize the same RM Plan and Report
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D ISO 14971:2019 vs MDR Annex 1, Requirement #4 - "Manufacturers shall inform users of any residual risks" ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
N Label Placement Requirement in MDD/MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Article 61 - MDR Clinical Investigation Requirement EU Medical Device Regulations 5
M EU MDR - Annex II 3b - What documents fall under this requirement? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A EU-MDR Annex I Requirement 10.1(d) EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M UDI labeling MDR requirement for reusable medical device accessories EU Medical Device Regulations 12
chris1price Is there a regulatory (MDD, MDR, FDA, ISO, etc) requirement to perform a mock recall? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
R The term "Benefit Risk Ratio" in EU MDR, do I need to present benefit risk analysis as a RATIO Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 0
R MDR, Annex I, 23.1 Interpretation - IFU on the website EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Two FDA questions regarding UDI (and potentially 803.52 MDR) Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
S EU MDR CAPA - GAP Assessment on CAPA SOPs EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M MDR Article 22 Interpretation EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A User interface Language Requirements - EU MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
L EU MDR Article 86 PSUR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S How is the service life for class I reusable medical devices described in MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 7
S How is the service life described for class I reusable medical devices in MDR? Elsmar Xenforo Forum Software Instructions and Help 1
P MDR/IVDR Annex III - Technical documentation on PMS EU Medical Device Regulations 1
E Our company is planning to file MDD not MDR next month. Do we require to show chemical characterization report ? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
S Classification of a product according to MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 3
L Classification under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
I Interpretation of the MDR GSPR 23.4 (u) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
S Converting SOP MDD to MDR Noob ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K Biological indicator system classification under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 2
L 'Distributor' definition & MDR/MSR relationship EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A What does this line from MDCG 2020-3 (MDR art. 120 substantial change) mean to you? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
J EU MDR getting closer - Special offer for Elsmar members 10/2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 13
G MDR translation requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K Applicability of Cybersecurity EU MDR 2017/745 Annex 1 23.4(ab), 14.2(d) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
K Applicability of eIFU as per EU MDR 2017/745 Annex 1 23.1 CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
rob73 UK Medical Device Regulations Forum - UK MDR Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 3
J Intervertebral body fusion cage, MDR Class II or Class III? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
F MDR GSPR Checklist template EU Medical Device Regulations 4
B Clinical Evaluation Expert Panels - MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M EU MDR - Labilities when a device is discontinued from the Market EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S National registrations for MDR certified devices in absence of EUDAMED EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Z MDR Class Ir deadline (Reusable surgical instruments) EU Medical Device Regulations 27
B MDR equvalent device - can you use a medicine as an equivalent 'device' EU Medical Device Regulations 8
N Harmonized Standards for MDR Certification EU Medical Device Regulations 7
K Is UDI (Unique Device Identifier) symbol mandatory under EU MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
K EU MDR Annex 1 Chapter III: Information in the Instructions for Use-23.4 (e) the performance characteristics of the device; EU Medical Device Regulations 1
R Requirements for MDR Article 22 Systems EU Medical Device Regulations 1
H EU MDR Economic Operator notifications? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M MDR EU Distributor for our CE Mark product in the for Netherlands EU Medical Device Regulations 6
R Declaration of conformity as per EU MDR (2017/745) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
K Class III Kit Box - Are translations mandatory under EU MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
B Herbal ingredients MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 0
S MDR GSPR Clause 17 - Software Requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 2
N Which EN ISO 17664 version compliance to EU MDR? Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 3
D Hospital Decontamination and the MDR - Technical Files, UDI and PMS EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K Submission of MDR File - Partner Companies - Computed Tomography (CT) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom