Measurement of Geometrical Tolerances on Small Parts

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#11
Do you mean by rotating the part and observing the variation with a microscope/projector?
Without actually seeing a part and the specifications, it's hard to say. I'm assuming that a standard optical comparator isn't appropriate for all of what you're trying to measure.

I've contacted several equipment suppliers, and also one measurement laboratory. My understanding was that the only way to measure these tolerances was by using a tactile system. But this solution is quite expensive, and it makes the inspection very time-consuming. That's the reason why I want to be sure that it's the only way.
Perhaps a trip back to the drawing board is in order. If the people who designed these parts are available, you need to sit down with them and ask them how you're supposed to measure what they've designed. The answer is likely to be a blank stare, but designers need to understand that they have to consider the state of the art in measurement (and its potential costs) when they do these things. Verifying measurement capabilities--both yours and your suppliers'--should be part of the design process. I know that might not be particularly helpful in getting you out of the fix you're in presently, but it's useful information for others reading this.

Most parts are actually drilled cylinders (i.e. tubes..) and the wall thickness is quite small (0.5 mm) and the surface to be checked for flatness are the extremities... As Jim mentioned, do you think it is possible to use optical flats on such small parts?
Again, without seeing the parts, it's hard to say. If you're talking about measuring flats on the OD of a cylinder, then optical flats probably won't work. If you're drilling on the ends of a cylinder, it might work, depending on the surface area available. You also have to consider the light source when using optical flats; it needs to be monochromatic (waves of a single length) in order for optical flats to be effective. It's a fairly tricky business if it's to be done correctly, and best avoided if there are other options.

I have also requirements on paralellism and perpendicularity on some of these parts, do you think they could also be measured with a vision system at that accuracy?
I don't know. If you've got a cylinder with a hole drilled through it lengthwise, and you need to measure the parallelism of the ends and the perpendicularity of the bore, you might be able to make a fixture for it, but it would probably involve (A) considerable expense, and (B) only attributes data.

Do you think it's better to have a non-contact solution?
Only if contact methods aren't feasible. Direct measurement is usually the best option if it can be done.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Q

qainsppai

#12
Without actually seeing a part and the specifications, it's hard to say. I'm assuming that a standard optical comparator isn't appropriate for all of what you're trying to measure.
I made a small drawing of an example part (in attachment) that puts together most of the specifications I'm talking about. Imagine you have to measure this part, how would you do? Any input is really welcome, because I thought about it a lot and I don't see a simple way of doing this...


Perhaps a trip back to the drawing board is in order. If the people who designed these parts are available, you need to sit down with them and ask them how you're supposed to measure what they've designed. The answer is likely to be a blank stare, but designers need to understand that they have to consider the state of the art in measurement (and its potential costs) when they do these things. Verifying measurement capabilities--both yours and your suppliers'--should be part of the design process. I know that might not be particularly helpful in getting you out of the fix you're in presently, but it's useful information for others reading this.
I know it's probably the better way. I just wanted to know the solution in the case I really have to measure these dimensions. Once I know the different possibililties, I can explain them the situation (what precision I can reach, at what cost, and what time it takes to perform the measurement) and they can take a decision. I don't have a very long experience in metrology, that's the reason why I wanted the point of view of more experienced people.
 

Attachments

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
#13
I made a small drawing of an example part (in attachment) that puts together most of the specifications I'm talking about. Imagine you have to measure this part, how would you do? Any input is really welcome, because I thought about it a lot and I don't see a simple way of doing this.
What are the tolerances on the outside diameter, inside diameter, and the length?

You are correct, there is no "simple" way of doing this. Come to think of it, you are located in Switzerland, a country well-known for the manufacturing of extremely high-precision parts, is there any way you could possible talk to a supplier of that type of high-precision measuring equipment? The geometrical (and dimensional?) requirements are pretty clear to me; it's the "smallness" of the part that makes me wonder.

Stijloor.
 
Last edited:
Q

qainsppai

#14
What are the tolerances on the outside diameter, inside diameter, and the length?
Well I just made up that part as an example. The length is not critical, so take 1.0±0.05. You can take Ø2.0h9(-0.025;0) and Ø1.6H9(0;+0.025).


You are correct, there is no "simple" way of doing this. Come to think of it, you are located in Switzerland, a country well-known for the manufacturing of extremely high-precision parts, is there any way you could possible talk to a supplier of that type of high-precision measuring equipment? The geometrical (and dimensional?) requirements are pretty clear to me; it's the "smallness" of the part that makes me wonder.
Yes I talked to some of them. The only solution I found was to use a Talyrond machine (this is an equipment specifically designed to measure geometrical tolerances on cylindrical parts with an extreme precision). Then I need to design a very precise fixation system to be able to measure it, because I can't put the part directly on the machine (too small...). But the equipment is quite expensive, and the whole process is really lengthy (several minutes for one measurement).
 

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
#15
Well I just made up that part as an example. The length is not critical, so take 1.0±0.05. You can take Ø2.0h9(-0.025;0) and Ø1.6H9(0;+0.025).

Yes I talked to some of them. The only solution I found was to use a Talyrond machine (this is an equipment specifically designed to measure geometrical tolerances on cylindrical parts with an extreme precision). Then I need to design a very precise fixation system to be able to measure it, because I can't put the part directly on the machine (too small...). But the equipment is quite expensive, and the whole process is really lengthy (several minutes for one measurement).
I am not knowledgeable enough to think of a solution beyond what the metrology equipment companies are suggesting. No matter how you look at this; it's not going to be "cheap" and not easy. I will continue to look into this further, but I do not know if I am able to come with suggestion that would meet your criteria.

What do my Fellow Covers think?

Stijloor
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#16
Well I just made up that part as an example. The length is not critical, so take 1.0±0.05. You can take Ø2.0h9(-0.025;0) and Ø1.6H9(0;+0.025).




Yes I talked to some of them. The only solution I found was to use a Talyrond machine (this is an equipment specifically designed to measure geometrical tolerances on cylindrical parts with an extreme precision). Then I need to design a very precise fixation system to be able to measure it, because I can't put the part directly on the machine (too small...). But the equipment is quite expensive, and the whole process is really lengthy (several minutes for one measurement).
In the example given, you might be able to check the parallelism and perpendicularity without too much trouble using a surface plate, pin and indicator (although you might have a problem with the tolerance) but the flatness and concentricity will be a real challenge. In particular, the concentricity seems nearly impossible to verify on a part of that size. Have a look at this discussion thread about GD&T concentricity. Whatever it is that can do it will be expensive, and I would definitely review the situation with the designer(s) before spending a lot of money.
 
U

Umang Vidyarthi

#17
Experts here have given very useful advise.

You may also try 'contactless devices' working on pneumatic pressure,having accuracy in micro inches;that work on signals returned by the surface in question,without touching the surface.These devices are perhaps cheaper than the lasers,I don't know for sure;I used them long back in 1972/73 while serving the Indian Railways.

Umang :2cents:
 

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
#18
In the example given, you might be able to check the parallelism and perpendicularity without too much trouble using a surface plate, pin and indicator (although you might have a problem with the tolerance) but the flatness and concentricity will be a real challenge. In particular, the concentricity seems nearly impossible to verify on a part of that size. Have a look at this discussion thread about GD&T concentricity. Whatever it is that can do it will be expensive, and I would definitely review the situation with the designer(s) before spending a lot of money.
Just a side note: The OP is from Switzerland. The interpretation of concentricity per ISO 1101:2004 is significantly different from the ASME Y14.5M-1994 Standard.

Stijloor.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Measurement Uncertainty in Optical Microscopy Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
B ISO 6508 and portable hardness measurement instruments General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
C How to Establish the Calibration & Measurement Capability (CMC)? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Ron Rompen Measurement of residual magnetism General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Surgical angle measurement guide device with an application software Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Disabling measurement data during fault conditions IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
J Most versatile measurement device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
P Surface scratch measurement General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
N Drawing tolerance vs. Measurement device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
Ron Rompen MSA on automated measurement system - Multiple Step Vision System Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
P Thermo-Hygrometer - Measurement of 10DegC @10%RH ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
hogheavenfarm GDT Flatness measurement question Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
K Software Validation for Measurement Tools used in Process Validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
K Best Measurement Systems Demos in California? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M Measurement Error - How to determine what is acceptable? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
K Process Mapping - Inputs/Outputs/Detail Activities/Control points/Measurement? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 4
B IEC 60601-2-10 - Accuracy of Pulse Parameters - Required Measurement Uncertainty IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
N Program or application for standard time measurement in industry from video surveillance? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 1
M Defining frequency of measurement tools callibration Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
T How to “validate/qualify” a new measurement equipment? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
Bev D Verification and Validation of Measurement Systems Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
F How do you add accuracies for tools with different measurement devices? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M Viable count Measurement ISO Standard Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
J Gauge R&R on a torque measurement Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
W Air Quality Measurement Hardware and Software General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
O Dimension Measurement Tool Recommendation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 21
G Does pitch/increment/resolution of a ruled scale apply to measurement uncertainty as line item? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 10
Marco Bernardi Plane measurement with a 3D touch machine like a CMM. Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
Marco Bernardi Diameters measurement with 3D touch machine like a CMM Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 4
R Uncertainty in measurement larger than tolerance Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 2
R Measurement Uncertainties Budget for Thermometer Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 6
O Performance Measurement ISO 9001: 2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
O Monitoring performance - How do I determine performance measurement basis within my organization? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
G What information to put on measurement Dimensional Results APQP and PPAP 7
D O Ring capability and measurement - What is the automotive 'norm' for capability studies on O Rings? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
F Electrical Metrology (Source/Generation and Measurement) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
F Measurement Audit and ILC for ISO 17025 Clause 7.7.2 - Comparison with results of other laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
Emran.mi Measurement system analysis - Can you help me about implementation MSA for CMM device Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K ISO 17025:2017 clause 7.6.2 - Performing calibration of its own equipment shall evaluate the measurement uncertainty ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
Q How should I analyze measurement correlation between me and customer? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
I Determining Calibration Tolerance of a Measurement Device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
Fernando Drumond Calibration and Control of Plastic Volumetric Measurement Instruments General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M Measurement Unit Rounding Nonconformity - Notified Body Audit Registrars and Notified Bodies 6
qualprod ISO 9001 Clause 9.1 - Monitoring measurement analysis and evaluation ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Gage R&R for Instant Measurement Machine Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
N Justifications for not performing MSA (Measurement System Analysis) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
T ISO 13485 8.2.5. Monitoring and measurement of quality management system processes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
A Records required for ISO 9001 clause 7.1.5.1 - Fitness for purpose of the monitoring and measurement resources ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
Ron Rompen Measurement Method Challenge - Measure feature #91 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom