Measuring Injection Molding Quality using Weight of final assembly

P

pabloquintana

#1
We have an injection molding shop that produce the plastic parts we require to encapsulate our electronic boards.

I can't remember where but I read somewhere there is a common quality control technique to weight the final product. A lot of defects can be traced to weight.

That could be used to monitor with SPC charts of variables to react faster.

Anyone with experience in this field.

Thanks. Pablo.:bigwave:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#2
Injection moulding is a problem for SPC.
One problem is that a lot of the materials have a shrinkage over time and this affects the measurement of the parts in relation to the time from injection.
This also means that if you are using SPC to get an immediate result you are in fact going to measure an incorrect dimension.
I have argued this successfully with many customers that wanted SPC.
Weight is a good parameter to use as it gives an immediate picture. More than that the nature of non conformances in plastic injection is that the vast majority are visual type defects, flash, non filling, inserts blocked etc, and here a small change of weight will show items that are sometimes difficult to see by eye. It also shows the functioning of the other parameters as the amount of packing of the resin in the part.
There is though a problem because the density of the plastic changes , within tolerances of the producer, the weight can change between lots of resin. This means that there is no absolute but the target weight must be decided on each injection.
In my view SPC by weight in injection moulding is the best method if you want an on line tool.
It is possible to perform a capability study in dimensions but I would recommend waiting 24 hours for this.
 
B

bmccabe - 2006

#3
I like your thinking here. One caution: I've found that unless the material (or sum of materials there of) has a specific density less than say .25 lbs/in^3, the variability from measurement error will prove unsatisfactory. Also, the total weight is a factor. Small quantities are just plane tough to measure.

Just my opinion, I have no real proof.
 
P

pabloquintana

#4
Howard Atkins said:
Injection moulding is a problem for SPC.
...but the target weight must be decided on each injection.
How would you decide which target? Any formula?

How can you relate flash marks, sink marks and other to weight? Is there any rule of thumb? For example, if it has flashes weight increases, if it has sink marks wieight decreases.

Thanks guys. :bigwave:
 
D

D.Scott

#5
pabloquintana said:
How would you decide which target? Any formula?

How can you relate flash marks, sink marks and other to weight? Is there any rule of thumb? For example, if it has flashes weight increases, if it has sink marks wieight decreases.

Thanks guys. :bigwave:
Very true, which is why we don't use weight. We use dimensional studies (vision system) to determine acceptability. If SPC or capability studies are required, we use the data from the vision system.

Dave
 
B

bmccabe - 2006

#6
pabloquintana said:
How would you decide which target? Any formula?

How can you relate flash marks, sink marks and other to weight? Is there any rule of thumb? For example, if it has flashes weight increases, if it has sink marks wieight decreases.

Thanks guys. :bigwave:
Sorry, I can't help you here. I know sink marks are likely caused by air pockets (voids) in the material. The plastic shrinks when it cures, which cause the depressions. Target weight and tolerance would be impossible for me to speculate. And you'll likely have long sold the job before any meaningful test could be completed. Flash and voids will likely average to an insignificant quantity. The weight of the components, and coper in the PCB are the higher density items, and probably 90% of the weight. Shoot from the hip?
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#7
pabloquintana said:
How would you decide which target? Any formula?

How can you relate flash marks, sink marks and other to weight? Is there any rule of thumb? For example, if it has flashes weight increases, if it has sink marks wieight decreases.

Thanks guys. :bigwave:
This is the reason why the system works, I have done experements which showed very small changes in weight , 0.03g and there was flash.
This is why I think that the weight is a good parameter. It is worth while trying to do a pilot to see how it works in your situation.
Dave, not every one has a vision system, and does it screen all sides?
As to target this is part of the setup procedure, the basic weight is know and you know the difference in density so this is easy to set the base line. The weight in fact shows the amount of packing, how do you know that with out weight?
I have not done this for some 10 years or more. I have a paper that I wrote on this I will try and find it and post it.
Are you talking about weight after encapsulation,if so then bmccabe is correct the weight instability of the PCB will far out way any change in the plastic
 
D

Dave Dunn

#8
Most visual aspects are not going to be reliably caught by weight. Minor flash where tolerances are critical (.1mm in many of our parts) is a negligible amount. Sink generally will be affected by poor cooling as well as low shot volume. Contamination, gas burn, warp, etc. are all visual aspects that will not affect the weight of the part significantly.

Weight can be a good tool to catch more severe problems: short shots, broken tooling, etc. but weight alone will not tell you if your parts are good, only that there is a change in the part mass. What that change means is what you will have to determine with further examination.
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#9
Dave Dunn said:
Most visual aspects are not going to be reliably caught by weight. Minor flash where tolerances are critical (.1mm in many of our parts) is a negligible amount. Sink generally will be affected by poor cooling as well as low shot volume. Contamination, gas burn, warp, etc. are all visual aspects that will not affect the weight of the part significantly.

Weight can be a good tool to catch more severe problems: short shots, broken tooling, etc. but weight alone will not tell you if your parts are good, only that there is a change in the part mass. What that change means is what you will have to determine with further examination.
I don't agree
I have actually seen discovery of flash by a change of 0.1g in 10 grams.
It all depends on how stable your process.
The only way to know is to try.
It will certainly light a warning which is the main purpose
Obviously the reason for the weight change needs to be found but that is needed in any system
 
P

pabloquintana

#10
Howard Atkins said:
Are you talking about weight after encapsulation,if so then bmccabe is correct the weight instability of the PCB will far out way any change in the plastic
I'm talking about the plastic only, without anything in it. What I'm trying to do is setup a more effective quality control system, plus the prevention which is monitoring the machine parameters.

My inspectors will take long time trying to decide if this flash or that splash will be OK or not. Too much subjectivity in. :truce:

Any other ideas?

Pablo
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C Measuring Equipment on Injection Machine should be Calibrated by 3rd party? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 21
R Tools used for measuring (New to metrology) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
G Best way to calc uncert for measuring microscope without duplicating repeatability? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 2
J Calibration cycle for monitoring & measuring tools used in medical device manufacturing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
cnbrosa Study Type 1 on a CMM using a measuring support Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
M Determining a tolerance value for Measuring devices in-house inspection General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
D Accurately measuring Full Thread Length Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 11
R ULM Measuring Pressures General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M Missing measuring equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
Marco Bernardi MMC & LMC modifiers and CMM measuring techniques like diameter least squares and circularity or minimum/ maximum diameter Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 5
K Measuring Function MEDDEV 2.1/5 relation with MDD 93/42/EEC CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
M Measuring FIM (TIR) - Two inside diameters - Conflicting readings between inspectors Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
ScottK Measuring thread flank angle on a screw Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
D ASTM C1064 Temperature Measuring Device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
B Measuring and monitoring equipment - Understanding which procedures to be compliant with ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C ISO 9001:2015 Monitoring and measuring resources. Application a service industry ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
V Ammeter calibration - Measuring head (on pic.) problem General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
D Monitoring and measuring resources - Example of how section ISO 9001 7.1.5 would apply to a manufacture of software ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
A CE mark - Measuring Instruments Directive confusion! CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
M Measuring Capability of Process with Multiple Specifications Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
E ISO 13485 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment - Assess the Validity ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D Measuring fine tubing (< 0.100") "Wall by weight" General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
G Posting Measuring Equipment Accuracy for User Information General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S ISO 9001 7.1.5.2 - Actions Taken When Measuring Equipment is Found to be Unfit for Use General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
G ISO 9001 and ISO 17025 - Measuring tools not in calibration system General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
S Calibration - Isolated current meter - Measuring patient auxiliary leakage current Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 4
G Measuring customer parts on a CMM - How many decimals to report to the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 28
qualprod Complying with ISO 9001:2015 - 9.1.1 b - Monitoring, measuring, analyzing and evaluation ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Tagin Measuring supplier quality with small quantities Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
G Uncertainty of staging a short line scale standard on longer measuring machine? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4
U Measuring a Golf Club Face/Grip/Shaft Rotation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
Q Acceptable calibration accuracy of a 60" linear measuring device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16
H Measuring Design Process Design and Development of Products and Processes 4
C AS9100D 7.1.5.2 / Calibration of Employee Owned Measuring Equipment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Effectiveness Measuring and Efficiency Measuring In ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
johnny johnson New measuring equipment selection (Cg/Cgk) Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
S Cleanrooms - Particle Measuring - ISO 14644 Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 3
S IOQ protocol for a Micro-Vu measuring system - Is a PQ required? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
K ISO 13485:2016 Cl. 4.2.3 - Determine QMS Processes, Monitoring, Measuring, etc. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
L Radius Measuring Tools General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
Proud Liberal Measuring axial and radial surface finish (16 Rz) on a broached internal radius Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
J IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.2.1 - Gauges (Measuring Jigs) Calibration/Verification Records IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Claes Gefvenberg Worst measuring equipment ever? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 6
J Measuring an Untrue Radius - Metal Stamped and Formed Parts Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
A Calibration Interval - AS9100 - Control of Monitoring and Measuring Equipment Calibration Frequency (Interval) 8
P Tool for Measuring - Do I have to do more than one Gage R&R for the PPAP? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
R Auditing Fitness of Purpose for Monitoring and Measuring Equipment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Measuring Leakage Currents with IEC 60601 defined Measurement Device (MD) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 15
rob73 Advice/recommendations for equipment to measure a soft pvc tube - Optical Measuring? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
A Monitoring and Measuring Resources (7.1.5) - Clarification ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom