Measuring Over Knurls for Cpk Data

J
#1
Drawing calls out for 96 DP Diamond Knurl.
Dia of shaft is .250
Dia of knurl is called out at .256 +.005/-0

When measuring the knurl I am getting variations in the readings depending on just where I hit the part. These variations are about .001 inch.

We are trying to perform a Cpk check on these parts as requested by our customer.

My question is what dim would I put down for this?
Do I go for the highest point, an average, or the lowest.

Any Ideas?

James
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#2
Drawing calls out for 96 DP Diamond Knurl.
Dia of shaft is .250
Dia of knurl is called out at .256 +.005/-0

When measuring the knurl I am getting variations in the readings depending on just where I hit the part. These variations are about .001 inch.

We are trying to perform a Cpk check on these parts as requested by our customer.

My question is what dim would I put down for this?
Do I go for the highest point, an average, or the lowest.

Any Ideas?

James
It would be best to measure the part at say, three different places, and report the range (highest and lowest). Averaging dimensional readings is never a good idea. As far as statistical analysis is concerned, you would be best advised to consult with the customer, discuss the inherent difficulties, and ask for guidance.

From the Hindsight is 20-20 Department: This sort of thing needs to be identified and settled at the contract review stage.
 
L

lee01

#3
My background is precision engineering and I used to work for a company that made, amongst other things, rotors of varying geometry, they were for the National Cash Registers (hole in the wall) and had several knurled features on them.

I have one observation though, when measuring the knurl, I wouldn’t measure it on each knurled point as you will get massive range differences as you cannot guarantee you have a corresponding knurl point on the other face of the micrometer. The best way to measure knurls (both straight and diamond form), and the best way to measure diameters in general, is to gently spin the part whilst slowly winding the micrometer onto the diameter. You should come to a point whereby the knurl is quite tight in the micrometer but does not stop spinning. If you manage to stop the part from spinning then you have the micrometer too tight. That way you get a sound ‘feel’ for the diameter as apposed to single point measurements. It’s a much improved and accurate way to measurement, I found.

Regards

Lee01
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#4
My background is precision engineering and I used to work for a company that made, amongst other things, rotors of varying geometry, they were for the National Cash Registers (hole in the wall) and had several knurled features on them.

I have one observation though, when measuring the knurl, I wouldn’t measure it on each knurled point as you will get massive range differences as you cannot guarantee you have a corresponding knurl point on the other face of the micrometer. The best way to measure knurls (both straight and diamond form), and the best way to measure diameters in general, is to gently spin the part whilst slowly winding the micrometer onto the diameter. You should come to a point whereby the knurl is quite tight in the micrometer but does not stop spinning. If you manage to stop the part from spinning then you have the micrometer too tight. That way you get a sound ‘feel’ for the diameter as apposed to single point measurements. It’s a much improved and accurate way to measurement, I found.

Regards

Lee01
The "best way" to measure anything should always take into account (if the specifications aren't enough) the way the thing will be used and the way the customer is likely to measure it. This means: when in doubt, ask the customer.
 
#5
What is the knurled feature used for? I have encountered something like this when a feature was tied down to the 'nth' degree, only to find out that the spec. didn't reflect its application! (The feature was a hole in a circuit board, tied to a +/- 0.005" - it was a 'finger hole' to access dip switches):lmao:

I'd check out why the customer is using such a close value on a feature which is formed in a relatively imprecise manner.......:yes:

This OP brought a smile to my face, because in school we all called it 'knurdling' - which drove the teacher nuts:lol:
(Jim, do I need to explain the 'British' terminology..........?:notme: )

Andy
 

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#6
A diamond knurl requires that kind of precision? All of our knurls are reference dimensions, we are far more concerned with the shaft diameter.

Having questioned that, it depends on the tool.
Using a caliper I would measure the diameter in three place and record the highest reading assuming you are concerned with fit or interference with a mating part.

Using an optical comparitor I would look for the widest point.
 

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#7
A diamond knurl requires that kind of precision? All of our knurls are reference dimensions, we are far more concerned with the shaft diameter.

Having questioned that, it depends on the tool.
Using a caliper I would measure the diameter in three place and record the highest reading assuming you are concerned with fit or interference with a mating part.

Using an optical comparitor I would look for the widest point.

I take the reference dimension comment back... just went and looked a few drawings and we don't do that for all. We call out "+- .010 over knurl" in some.
 
#8
Thinking about this some more has brought the thought that the form of the knurl is more important than the overall diameter. The formation of a full diamond or straight knurl was preferable to the specific diameter. Even if spec'd with +/- 0.010.

Andy
 
L

lee01

#9
Responding to Jim ’Textbook’ Wynnes comments regarding his ask the customer suggestion. In an ideal world yes, and as instructed in many textbooks (which I might add, tend to be written by scholars who haven’t worked in industry for many many years – and there will be a reason for that) you could do that, but practically, in most instances, hmmm.

To be honest if I had a supplier who asked me how to measure a knurl, I’d be worried no matter what the value of the product issued to the supplier was.

I have never been requested to measure features of a part in a certain way (except for GD&T callouts whereby features are measured against datum’s), but that’s not actual measurement in this sense.

In any way, there is no need to speak to the customer regarding basic measurement principles, I’m sorry to say that measurement of this types is at its basic state, I’m not sure where you’re being educated but to measure knurls and/ or diameters in three places is absolutely ridiculous, I was trying to offer advice in this matter, besides falling off my chair in amazement at this question.

Lee01
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#10
Responding to Jim ’Textbook’ Wynnes comments regarding his ask the customer suggestion. In an ideal world yes, and as instructed in many textbooks (which I might add, tend to be written by scholars who haven’t worked in industry for many many years – and there will be a reason for that) you could do that, but practically, in most instances, hmmm.
If the suggestion is that I lack practical experience, you're going to be disappointed. I have it on both sides of the customer/supplier fence, and a lot of it, from doing basic mechanical inspection to managing large quality departments. I have, on innumerable occasions, been the poor schmuck with a part and a drawing and no clue as to what the designer might have been thinking, or what was actually needed. I have no idea what you might think the big obstacle is in (gasp!) actually talking to customers about how best to make them happy. True enough, it's not always possible, but it is in most instances, and I'm speaking from personal experience.

To be honest if I had a supplier who asked me how to measure a knurl, I’d be worried no matter what the value of the product issued to the supplier was.
One would think you'd have better things to worry about. It's not a question of asking a customer how to measure a knurl--I have a suspicion that I was measuring knurls before you even knew what a knurl was--it's a matter of understanding the customer's needs, and making sure that when there's any ambiguity at all, you do whatever's necessary to know and not guess. Look at the OP's question. It's not just a matter of how to measure the knurl; there's also the small matter of a "Cpk check." It appears that the measurement over the knurl might be important.

And speaking as a person who, for the past several years, had dealt with supplier quality for a large OEM, I like it when suppliers call to discuss measurement methods. I don't assume that they lack basic skills just because they want to understand the requirements. The fact that you seem to think that suppliers who want to talk about important things with their customers are perhaps not very bright, I can understand why many suppliers are reluctant to call customers.

I have never been requested to measure features of a part in a certain way (except for GD&T callouts whereby features are measured against datum’s), but that’s not actual measurement in this sense.
We're not talking about being told how to measure something, we're talking about asking questions when ambiguity exists. But if you've never been caught in a position where there's conflict over measurement methods, then...

In any way, there is no need to speak to the customer regarding basic measurement principles, I’m sorry to say that measurement of this types is at its basic state, I’m not sure where you’re being educated but to measure knurls and/ or diameters in three places is absolutely ridiculous, I was trying to offer advice in this matter, besides falling off my chair in amazement at this question.
[/quote]

Everyone's advice is welcome.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R Tools used for measuring (New to metrology) General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
G Best way to calc uncert for measuring microscope without duplicating repeatability? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 2
J Calibration cycle for monitoring & measuring tools used in medical device manufacturing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
cnbrosa Study Type 1 on a CMM using a measuring support Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
M Determining a tolerance value for Measuring devices in-house inspection General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
D Accurately measuring Full Thread Length Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 11
R ULM Measuring Pressures General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
M Missing measuring equipment General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
Marco Bernardi MMC & LMC modifiers and CMM measuring techniques like diameter least squares and circularity or minimum/ maximum diameter Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 5
K Measuring Function MEDDEV 2.1/5 relation with MDD 93/42/EEC CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
M Measuring FIM (TIR) - Two inside diameters - Conflicting readings between inspectors Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
ScottK Measuring thread flank angle on a screw Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
D ASTM C1064 Temperature Measuring Device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
B Measuring and monitoring equipment - Understanding which procedures to be compliant with ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C ISO 9001:2015 Monitoring and measuring resources. Application a service industry ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
V Ammeter calibration - Measuring head (on pic.) problem General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
D Monitoring and measuring resources - Example of how section ISO 9001 7.1.5 would apply to a manufacture of software ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
A CE mark - Measuring Instruments Directive confusion! CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
M Measuring Capability of Process with Multiple Specifications Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
E ISO 13485 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment - Assess the Validity ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D Measuring fine tubing (< 0.100") "Wall by weight" General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
G Posting Measuring Equipment Accuracy for User Information General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S ISO 9001 7.1.5.2 - Actions Taken When Measuring Equipment is Found to be Unfit for Use General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
G ISO 9001 and ISO 17025 - Measuring tools not in calibration system General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
S Calibration - Isolated current meter - Measuring patient auxiliary leakage current Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 4
G Measuring customer parts on a CMM - How many decimals to report to the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 28
qualprod Complying with ISO 9001:2015 - 9.1.1 b - Monitoring, measuring, analyzing and evaluation ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Tagin Measuring supplier quality with small quantities Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
G Uncertainty of staging a short line scale standard on longer measuring machine? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4
U Measuring a Golf Club Face/Grip/Shaft Rotation General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
Q Acceptable calibration accuracy of a 60" linear measuring device General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16
H Measuring Design Process Design and Development of Products and Processes 4
C AS9100D 7.1.5.2 / Calibration of Employee Owned Measuring Equipment AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Effectiveness Measuring and Efficiency Measuring In ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
johnny johnson New measuring equipment selection (Cg/Cgk) Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
S Cleanrooms - Particle Measuring - ISO 14644 Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 3
S IOQ protocol for a Micro-Vu measuring system - Is a PQ required? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
K ISO 13485:2016 Cl. 4.2.3 - Determine QMS Processes, Monitoring, Measuring, etc. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
L Radius Measuring Tools General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
Proud Liberal Measuring axial and radial surface finish (16 Rz) on a broached internal radius Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
J IATF 16949 Cl. 7.1.5.2.1 - Gauges (Measuring Jigs) Calibration/Verification Records IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Claes Gefvenberg Worst measuring equipment ever? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 6
J Measuring an Untrue Radius - Metal Stamped and Formed Parts Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
A Calibration Interval - AS9100 - Control of Monitoring and Measuring Equipment Calibration Frequency (Interval) 8
P Tool for Measuring - Do I have to do more than one Gage R&R for the PPAP? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
R Auditing Fitness of Purpose for Monitoring and Measuring Equipment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Measuring Leakage Currents with IEC 60601 defined Measurement Device (MD) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 15
rob73 Advice/recommendations for equipment to measure a soft pvc tube - Optical Measuring? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
A Monitoring and Measuring Resources (7.1.5) - Clarification ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
R Measuring LiON Battery State of charge - Transporting batteries by Air RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom