2
Hi All-
Can anyone think of a good explanation as to why Hazards were at one time categorized into Normal Use Risks and Faulty Use Risks, and what the benefit was of that breakout? Are there certain elements or info that could be missing by identifying the individual Hazard as the starting point? I see that most assesments now look at probability and danger to assess risk, and this makes sense. But when I look at older analysis tools I have saved on file, there are many that look at Fault and Normal, about 2002 and earlier.
Also, if anyone would like to share what they use, particularly for a class I disposable risk assessment, that would be great! I have several copies, but not any close to my industry.
Thanks!
Can anyone think of a good explanation as to why Hazards were at one time categorized into Normal Use Risks and Faulty Use Risks, and what the benefit was of that breakout? Are there certain elements or info that could be missing by identifying the individual Hazard as the starting point? I see that most assesments now look at probability and danger to assess risk, and this makes sense. But when I look at older analysis tools I have saved on file, there are many that look at Fault and Normal, about 2002 and earlier.
Also, if anyone would like to share what they use, particularly for a class I disposable risk assessment, that would be great! I have several copies, but not any close to my industry.
Thanks!