Medical Device PCB component change

MDD_QNA

Involved In Discussions
#1
We have a medical device where we now are changing 2 components in the PCB. Does this change count as a substantial change or not? Our main standard is -2-57 (which in turn points to 60601-1 ed 3 wo amn 1).
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
More information will be needed. What are the components? Have you done any risk analysis to determine the potential impact of the change (impact to existing risk controls, any new risks posed, etc.)? Does the change alter the functionality?
 

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
#3
As yodon says, your risk analysis is critical.

Consider such things as:

1. Does changing the components potentially invalidate previous testing (e.g. EMC)? If so, re-testing is likely required. If not, document your analysis, and justify why the change doesn't impact previous test-results.

2. Does the change affect function, or device specifications? If so, this is likely a significant change.

3. Does the change affect your previous risk-assessments? Are these critical components necessary for safety/risk-mitigation?

The FDA has a pretty comprehensive document on assessing the significance of a change.
 
Last edited:

MDD_QNA

Involved In Discussions
#4
One of the components is a "common-mode choke". It's placed in the DC (48v) feeding path of the lamp (MD) and have the purpose of acting as a filter for common mode noise that might have been induced by electromagnetic fields on the dc feeding cable between the power supply and the lamp head. It also filters noise. The parameters that are important for its functionality such as physical shape, its ability to make resistance to common mode noise and its ability to withstand the votage and the current used by the lamp are not changed. Operating voltage is changed from 250 v to 300 v, which is well within the specifications.

The other comp is a P-channel MOSFET. It controls the power on/off of the lamp. Its specification parameters are well beyond what is required for achieving the functionality of the MD.

No new tests are necessary, previous testing is still valid, function and specification of the lamp remains the same before and after the change. And right now we have a justification as to why re-testing is not necessary.
So what do you think? Significant or not?
 

Pads38

Trusted Information Resource
#5
I would suggest that, from a safety perspective, your changes are probably not significant and would not change test outcomes.

However, both components are significant from an EMC perspective.
How the FET switches could affect Radiated Emissions.

The CM choke is clearly directly impacting the EMC outcome - careful examination of your EMC test report and your design history file should enable you to understand why/when it was included so as to identify the critical tests to show continued compliance.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N PCB (medical device) Surface Finish Selection. Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
R Sample Size for PCB used in a Medical Device Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
J 21 CFR 821 Medical Device Tracking Requirement 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
S Iraq Medical Device registration Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
R Medical Device Software Certification IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
D Medical Device Accessories Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
F Change to Formulation due to Reach (China Medical Device Regulations) China Medical Device Regulations 0
R Accelerated Aging - Creating test samples - Implantable medical device Question Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
T Clinical evaluation of a new medical device EU Medical Device Regulations 0
7 Iraq Medical Device Chemical Regulations Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
J UCLA extension Medical Device Engineering Program Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
Q Storing and developing SAMD (Software as a Medical Device) in the Cloud IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 2
I ISO 2233:2000 Question - Medical Device Shipping/Transportation Validation Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
R Identify Medical Device characterstics as Annex C of ISO 14971 Risk Management ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
O ANATEL certification of Medical Device Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
Ajit Basrur FDA News Harmonizing and Modernizing Regulation of Medical Device Quality Systems (7-2020) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Legal Manufacturer Medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
S Looking for Quality Content to Build Medical Device Curriculum - Concept to Commercialization Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
A Interpretation of GMP Requirements for class 1 medical device manufacturer (device GMP exempt, only General controls applicable) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
A Legal Manufacturer of a medical device Vs Legal Manufacturer of MDSW EU Medical Device Regulations 7
T Loaded spring device - Active medical device? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
MDD_QNA Medical Device Software - Is a Help Button required? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
H MDD Article 12 Labeling for Class IIa Medical Device - Please Advise EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J Does Pakistan Medical Device Import License allows parallel import? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
K China Medical Device Labeling requirements - Language China Medical Device Regulations 3
F Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Technical File Requirements Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
A Sample Agreement available for Outsourcing Medical Device Design activity? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
dgrainger Informational EU medical device website change from 'Growth' to 'Health and Food Safety' (6/2020) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
B How to classify a medical device based on MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J Need for a cleanroom in the manufacture of a medical device for a clinical trial EU Medical Device Regulations 4
A Software as Medical Device (SaMD) definition and its applicability Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 4
F Labelling requirements for a medical device containing fragrance allergens EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A Medical device Reporting : Good Faith Effort for Additional information Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
A Medical Device Vigilance decision tree for Japan for class 2 devices. Japan Medical Device Regulations 1
I How to classify a medical device based on FDA? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
S The US FDA requirements on Disposal of a medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
Edward Reesor EU Authorized Representative for a Class I Medical Device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 11
E IEC 60601-1 - Unearthed Medical Device Metal Parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
U Medical Device Design finalization testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S FDA Requirements for Medical Device Label Reconciliation 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
J Medical Device Registration in the UAE MoH Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 2
JoCam Medical Device Distribution in the UK EU Medical Device Regulations 6
B FDA-Medical Device Reporting (MDR )procedure compliant with 21CFR section 803 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
R An indication that the device is a medical device (MDR, Annex 23.2q) - applicable for accessories? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
W Direct to customer export of medical device (class I: prescription lenses + frame) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
J Validity / outcomes measure for custom made medical device ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Regulatory job in pharma vs. medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 16
S Regulatory job in pharma vs. medical device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
C New Class III medical device application for Health Canada Canada Medical Device Regulations 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom