Method other than internal auditing

B
#1
In our certification audit report I found a remark: "A method, other than internal auditing, to ensure that a procedure is effectively implemented either a new or modified procedure is not taken into consideration."

Do you know this kind of methods or this is only a statement from auditor.

Good luck,

Bela
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

John C

#2
Bela,
The wording seems incomplete but that is often the case when auditors read from notes made on the spot. It is clear to them at the time.
My best guess at this would be that this is not a write up of an n/c finding but a recommendation regards a potential weakness. It seems that the auditor had some reason to believe that a procedure being released could, or has been, overlooked by people who need to know. The only way of catching the error could be by finding the problem during an audit.
When a procedure is changed or released, it is necessary to inform everyone who needs to know and take action. For reasons of economy, the group responsible for document control, hive off this responsibility to people changing or releasing procedures but that person's knowledge of the system or committment is not sufficient to ensure it is done properly.
The solution can be complex and difficult or expensive and time consuming. The group responsible can be motivated if they are held answerable for the failure of the existing method and they should make sure it happens either by doing it themselves or by ensuring a reliable method is devised and that all concerned are fuly trained and committed to follow it.
rgds, John C
 
D

David Mullins

#3
This gets back to my question elsewhere on the forum that almost nobody is willing to tackle:
What is an economical and efficient means for creating evidence that staff are aware of new/revised procedures and have read and understood them? (in a non-electronic system, without creating a mountain of records)

------------------
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
#4
I don't know why you cannot use internal audits as evidence.
"A method, other than internal auditing, to ensure that a procedure is effectively implemented either a new or modified procedure is not taken into consideration."
You have a defined system is how. Your system has to define the process of initiating new procedures and how to change a procedure. The system has to address issues such as distribution and, where appropriate, training. Each company is different as are different type of procedures (by procedures I also encompass documents such as work instructions, etc.) in a company. Change the Scrap procedure (assuming a global procedure) and a lot of people have to be informed in some way.

This can be taken to extremes. In a wafer fab tests are given, shift change meetings are utilized, etc. In an basic assembly shop there are seldom tests and often no shift meetings. But - if your system is designed well (and works well) you can find plenty of evidence that you comply.

How do I know operators are using the most recent issue? You use a defined system which ensures removal of obsolete documents. I see no reason why you can't verify that the system is effective through internal audits, however. How do I know if a procedure was effectively implemented? What type of procedure are we talking about... If you implement a specific work instruction you can cite scrap resulting from operator error, as an example. If there are high scrap levels which can be traced to operator error and the error is determined to be the result of using an obsolete work instruction, your document update system may be broken (or they may have hidden cheat sheets which is another issue).

The point is, you have to look at your over all systems and consider outputs. You have to use some common sense here. You can't test everyone on every procedural change. Nor can you follow up on every procedural change to 'ensure' it is 'effectively' implemented.

And I sure would like other comments on my thoughts. I'm not very good with words.
 
A

Andy Bassett

#5
Hello David

I have read your post on other threads, and something else has just come to mind, althoug it is not any easy system maybe it helps. After having spent much time setting up a procedure to train employees in new or changed procedures i have noticed that understanding/remembering is very poor.

In addition to having the process owner (instead of me) do the training i now also include a 'understanding check' where the employees are asked specific questions to ensure that they have understood the content. This does seem to have improved the 'absorption of the content' but unfortunately does involve some extra work to set up the 'understanding checks'

Regards

------------------
Andy B
 

Kevin Mader

One of THE Original Covers!
Leader
Admin
#6
I agree with Marc. PDCA at work. Auditing is the checking function. If folks aren't reading or understanding what they read, it should be evident.

Regards,

Kevin
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
LabCat Internal SOP for a validated (ISO) method? ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
G Structure and Method behind the Planning of 8.2.2 Internal Audit Internal Auditing 6
T Accurate Method of Internal Radius Check Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 18
V Internal Scale and Balance Calibration Method Tolerances and Limits General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
L AS 9100 Internal Audit - What is the scoring method followed? Checklist? Internal Auditing 3
B In house Internal auditor training - Need of a method of training more Auditors Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
C Test Method Validation - ISO Standards Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
M Risk-based approach to Test Method Validation for Design Verification? US Medical Device Regulations 4
A Taguchi method with replicates Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
K Analytical Method Qualification Vs Validation expectations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
N Calibration Method for Scales and Flowmeters Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7
M Any alternative method instead of using GR&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 26
K ISO 17025 Method Validation and Verification for Test Lab ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
J IEC60601-1: HiPot Test Method for Internally Powered Devices IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
I Cryogenic Container Closure Integrity for HCT/P, Validation Method US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
F Self Evident Inspection Method ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
A ISO certs from suppliers - Expiration Tracking Method Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 14
V Handling deviations during analytical method validations Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
S Help needed in choosing the method of calculating the minimum sample size Internal Auditing 12
R R&R according to the Amplitude method Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
D Finding Optimum Design Parameters using Taguchi method? Using Minitab Software 2
P Test Method Validation (TMV) for all Measurement Methods in Rec/Inspection Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
S Determining Sample Size and Method Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 12
A GAGE R&R Binomial with master list (for method validation) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
shimonv Test Method Validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
F Compendial method verification Design and Development of Products and Processes 0
Q Process map Evaluation and Analysis Method Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M V&V phase: Justification of acceptance criteria (statistical method ) - (Medical Device) Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
Q Sampling method for Distributor verification activities EU Medical Device Regulations 1
D Difference between Test Method Validation and Gage R&R Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 20
C Correct Calibration Method for Dial Depth Gage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
E Mentor for Test Method Validation (TMV) Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
earl62 IATF 16949 Clause 9.1.1.1 - What is the batch conformance to specification method? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Beginners help with ISO3951-2 Combined control s-method n>5 what is Phi ?? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
S What is the best method to bond urethane foam to urethane foam? Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
R BS EN 12060:1998 - Zinc and zinc alloys Method of sampling Specifications Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
M Test method validation - Is MSA (MSA1, MSA2, MSA3 and linearity) a good solution? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
Pau Calvo How to motivate colleagues to use 8D method or similar Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 37
M Proper method to test flow of a regulator Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
V Minitab GRR crossed Xbar and r method macro needed Using Minitab Software 9
R Please share your method used for PEMS Validation IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 5
S AS9100D PEAR - Examples for organization's method for determining process results? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
Y Post Market Surveillance Indicators and Analysis method EU Medical Device Regulations 1
silentmonkey Seeking efficient method to manage install base data Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
D 4M (Man, machine, method, materials) Management Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
Ron Rompen Measurement Method Challenge - Measure feature #91 Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 9
C FDA on changing acceptance criteria re: analytical method validation US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
M Issuing NCR for improper method statement submissions Internal Auditing 10
F Irradiation Sterilization Validation Maximum Dose - VDmax 25 method (ISO 11137) EU Medical Device Regulations 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom