Minor Non-Conformance - Maintenance Records Not Fully Completed

piningg

Involved In Discussions
#1
We are a packaging company and recently audited externally.
We have a maintenance procedure that requires maintenance planner to issue workorder to fitter and once done - paperwork will goes back to the planner to update the system.
External auditor requires all fitter to make a comment, sign and dated all workorder paperwork prior giving to the planner.
Auditor is saying its a traceability issue?
We are a company that produce product so traceability should be on the product raw materials , bar codes etc..
Any comments
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
can you tell us what clause the auditor wrote the finding against so we can help with a more precise answer?

It is a traceability issue... but not a product traceability issue. What the auditor is looking for is evidence that the work was completed by tracing the work flow back to the mechanic that performed it. If the mechanic is not signing or initialing the maintenance work order and dating when the work was actually completed then you are missing a piece of evidence that it was completed and completed on-time.
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#3
Unless your procedure states that all the stuff your auditor said in the NC appeal it. So re-look at your procedures for documents, records and the maintenance stuff itself to make sure of the requirements for dates, signature and everything else...You auditor can't require diddly squat.

Like Scott said traceability is to product, materials and all that, not maintenance paperwork.

At the most it would most likely be a documentation error (NC).

There could be other variables we aren't aware of
 

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#5
Yes, it's a non-sense finding. Does ISO 9001 even require maintenance?
7.1.3 is what we real world manufacturing practitioners cite for Maintenance. It includes equipment. "the organization shall determine, provide, and maintain…"


So... if I'm auditing a supplier... show me the maintenance schedule and logs for equipment that impacts the conformity of the product or service. Sounds like the OP has a system but needs to clarify how the evidence that the system is being followed is documented.
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#7
hello there!

We have a maintenance procedure that requires maintenance planner to issue workorder to fitter and once done - paperwork will goes back to the planner to update the system.
Let's set aside the auditor/finding thing for a moment. So you issue a work order for someone to complete work. What exactly does the fitter return back to the planner? I would think it would add more value to the maintenance process if the fitter did document their activities, and note who did it and when.

A good maintenance program is worth its weight in gold; and a useless one, is worse than not having one at all in my opinion. It doesn't do any good not to have proper maintenance activities identified, and then a good process to document what got replaced (and with what); what are some potential problem areas; etc. This way, the most correct things are being maintained to reduce downtime; and is more than a paper chase.

External auditor requires all fitter to make a comment, sign and dated all workorder paperwork prior giving to the planner.
Auditor is saying its a traceability issue?
Forgive me for narrowing in on something, but I guess it's the word "require". Why is an auditor requiring anything? They can cite a particular procedure requirement not being fulfilled, or maybe making a recommendation.

Like the others said, a little more detail will help. The finding may be a worthwhile cite; and it could be rubbish. It all depends on how the finding is written up. :agree1:
 

piningg

Involved In Discussions
#9
hello there!



Let's set aside the auditor/finding thing for a moment. So you issue a work order for someone to complete work. What exactly does the fitter return back to the planner? I would think it would add more value to the maintenance process if the fitter did document their activities, and note who did it and when.

A good maintenance program is worth its weight in gold; and a useless one, is worse than not having one at all in my opinion. It doesn't do any good not to have proper maintenance activities identified, and then a good process to document what got replaced (and with what); what are some potential problem areas; etc. This way, the most correct things are being maintained to reduce downtime; and is more than a paper chase.



Forgive me for narrowing in on something, but I guess it's the word "require". Why is an auditor requiring anything? They can cite a particular procedure requirement not being fulfilled, or maybe making a recommendation.

Like the others said, a little more detail will help. The finding may be a worthwhile cite; and it could be rubbish. It all depends on how the finding is written up. :agree1:
Am new into the company barely 3 week. Fitters usually forgets to sign the Worders hence planner/manager verify their job and tick them off the system. No signing required. If our procedure doesnt require any signature by the fitters, does the auditor have the power to give us NCR for that..
Clause8.5.1 control of production and service provision Iso9001.
Am i right thinking that we are not service provision company as we are more into product.
I do understand if we are a service provision Iso9001 company we have to sign on all workorders or any scope of work completion papers.
But we are a manufacturing company. Fitters not signing on workorders but being verified by the planner is our risk qnd should have been an OFI instead of a MInor non conformance.
The auditor is also claiming we are NC to 8.5.2 ID and traecability which i believe is more applicable to our product which we do have and not traceability on who has fixed the machine.
I do understand its ideal for our fitter to sign the paperwork for accountability but not treaceability.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C Fact or fiction - Repeat minor becomes a major IATF non-conformance IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
D Minor non-conformance for not receiving a CofC from a heat treater Manufacturing and Related Processes 10
Q Minor non-conformance for not controlling local regulation laws? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
L Root Cause for Minor Non-conformance regarding Supplier Delegation Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
M Definition Major vs. Minor Non Conformance Definitions Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 14
T External Communications - Should this have been raised as a Minor Non-Conformance? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 12
I TS 16949 Audit Minor non conformance - Outside Calibration Laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
T Non-addressed Minor Finding elevated to Major Finding Internal Auditing 37
B IATF 16949: Definition Major/Minor Non-conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
B Root Cause Analysis for Minor Non-Conformities identified in an Audit Nonconformance and Corrective Action 13
C Show cause letter given as a result of a minor non-conformity raised by CB Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
S Can a registrar recommend with minor non-conformities closed before end of audit? General Auditing Discussions 7
Q ISO 14001:2015 accredited but import most product - CB Raised minor NC on Life Cycle Perspective ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
G Timing allowed by IATF to close a Remote Site Minor Nonconformance IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
J EU ISO 13485:2016 Recertification Audit - Effect of 10 Minor Nonconformances EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Y Informational Change control process - Major vs Minor change - Active class III medical devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
S Minor diameter of threaded ring gage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
A Where are the rules for when a repeat minor nonconformance becomes a major? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 36
supadrai Informational Japan Minor Change Notification Application Form - Found it? Japan Medical Device Regulations 0
P Major Finding Elevation - Do I elevate this minor finding to a major one? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 14
W Minor Audit Nonconformance Against Determining the scope of QMS IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
P Received a minor for not having good measureables/goals. Need help with KPIs. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 52
M "Minor" Address Change Implications on Product Labeling Requirements Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
Sidney Vianna Top 10 Major and minor NC's during IATF 16949:2016 Audits IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
K Notified Body - Minor Nonconformances - They have withheld all certificates General Auditing Discussions 3
T Defining Major vs. Minor Changes to Procedures ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
R Classification of Major & Minor Defects AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 10
Hershal Minor quake in So Cal - 17 March 2014 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 4
M Is a New Revision Required for Minor Document Changes? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 15
L Definitions for Minor & Major Nonconformances ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
S What constitutes Major and Minor changes in Software Software Quality Assurance 7
F Response to ISO 13485 Audit Minor Nonconformances ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
E Short Case Studies - Major/Minor Nonconformance, Observation or OK? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
R Audit Plan MNC (Minor Nonconformance) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
M Is a Corrective Action required for each major/minor Tool Repair? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 7
S Minor Nonconformity for Lack of Job Descriptions in ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 62
M Minor/ Major Change - Japan - When you have to notify the PMDA of a change? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
J Major NC downgraded to Minor by Registrar during Re-Visit Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
S Minor NC for Not Having Management Review When Scheduled Management Review Meetings and related Processes 12
S MBA Finance major & HR minor job opportunity in TQM field Career and Occupation Discussions 1
S Auditor says a Minor Nonconformance will become a Major Nonconformance General Auditing Discussions 8
A Supplier Evaluation SOP - How do I Define Major and Minor Suppliers? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 14
J Minor NC - No MSA study on Tensile Tester IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
N Minor Concern - Medical Device Software and Risk Management ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
P Trying to figure Minor ? on Female Rolled Threads Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 1
J Minor Corrections to Documented Procedures ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
M ASME B1.13M Standard - Specification of a Plug Gage of Minor Diamateter Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
2 Minor Document Change Control - Minor text changes to work procedures Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
M Is it necessary to classify nonconformance as minor, major, observations in an IQA? Internal Auditing 18
J Communicating Quality Objectives - Minor Nonconformance AS9100B/ISO9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom