MRB (Material Review Board) Investigations

S

sweet1

#1
I work for a Manufacturer of Class I Medical Devices. ISO13485:2016 (as of a week ago by the skin of our teeth). The products are very low risk, non sterile. Due to our somewhat antiquated machines and unstable processes, we tend to have a lot of cosmetic failures. We follow our NC process and all NCs are reviewed by the MRB group during a brief daily meeting as well as a more formal weekly meeting. I lead these meetings and assign investigation to the appropriate department managers.

Most of our internal NCs are due to production operators not paying attention or being unclear as to what constitutes as a failed product, even though we have documentation and training that they must sign off on. These failures are identified during a final release inspection. Many of our corrective actions refer to "retraining" on the production side, but the failures continue to occur so clearly it is not effective.

Our operations manager is assigned these NCs for investigation, but does NOTHING. We cannot close these out until an investigation, CA and verification are done. I have a large number of NCs where the goods have been dispositioned and I am only awaiting the corrective action. Is there any way around this or is it acceptable to not perform an investigation? I will be rewriting our NC process and can incorporate anything, but I need to make sure we are still compliant.

Any advise?

Thanks in advance. This is my first post, but I have been a lurker for about a year :notme:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Congrats on your first post! An interesting one.

I guess the cost of the daily meetings plus ostensibly scrap doesn't outweigh the desire for improvement? It sounds clear that management is not interested in resolving the issue.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#3
Welcome to The Cove. I moved this thread to the ISO 13485 forum because it is important for people to realize the context of the question is under a medical device manufacturing context.

Can you share what has been the disposition of the rejected products, in general? Are they scrapped? Accepted as is? Reworked? That has an impact on the answers.
 
S

sweet1

#4
Welcome to The Cove. I moved this thread to the ISO 13485 forum because it is important for people to realize the context of the question is under a medical device manufacturing context.

Can you share what has been the disposition of the rejected products, in general? Are they scrapped? Accepted as is? Reworked? That has an impact on the answers.
Thank you for moving this. Still learning how to navigate here.


Generally our dispositions are either to scrap or "rework" (which is generally sorting out the N/C parts and then approving the conforming, no reprocessing).
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#5
Generally our dispositions are either to scrap or "rework" (which is generally sorting out the N/C parts and then approving the conforming, no reprocessing).
That being the case, it might behoove you to quantify monetarily how much is being wasted in nonconforming products and bring that to the attention of upper management, so they apply the pressure for the interested parties to investigate the actual root cause and apply true corrective action, but, remember, it might be more "cost effective" to maintain this seemingly poor quality arrangement and end up sorting bad product than to invest in new equipment.

Good luck.
 

Woody

Starting to get Involved
#6
Sidney Vianna provides good insight: translate all the activities associated into dollars. The Operations Manager doing nothing is the likely reason the problems do not go away. While I am not at all familiar with ISO 13485, I am certain there must be a Management Review activity. This is the great equalizer. Where a process metric does not meet the goal, action is to be taken. Find a way to bring these issues before Management Review to get past the do-nothing ops manager.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J Example of a defined procedure for carrying out Material Review Board (MRB) Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
R MRB (Material Review Board) Process using MS Sharepoint or MS Teams Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
W Scope of MRB (Material Review Board) Responsibilities Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
J I am looking for a Material Review Board (MRB) meeting agenda ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
S MRB (Material Review Board) Agenda help Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 14
V Can you explain about "MATERIAL REVIEW BOARD" (MRB)? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 13
T NCR (Nonconformance Report) vs. MRB (Material Review Board) Nonconformance and Corrective Action 27
B Starting a Corrective Action Board (MRB - Material Review Board)? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 10
Marc Acronym MRB - Material Review Board - A cross functional review - Acronym Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 2
T Occurance of Non-Conformance, MRB (Material Review Board) and Record keeping Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 34
G Out of Dimensional Tolerance - MRB Audit Issue Nonconformance and Corrective Action 11
M Class I versus Class II Medical Device MRB Authority AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
Q I was assigned as Kaizen Leader for our MRB Area - Your advice appreciated Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
N Scrap Stored Long Term in MRB - ISO 9001 Nonconformance or Annoyance? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
H MRB Certification and/or career path? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
M Evolution has taken away MIL-STD-1520 C - What to use now? MRB and PMR Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
E Basics of Materials Review Board (MRB) - When and Why it is required? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
M Corrective actions - The act of having an MRB review and disposition General Auditing Discussions 13
S Advice on how to reduce overhead of handling non-conforming material Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
R AS9102 FAI Change in Material / Process Supplier AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
S Predicate Material 510(k) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
S Predicate Material 510(k) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
lanley liao Who can share these material with me ? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
E Record Retention - Raw Material (Steel Certs) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 3
M Documents to be included in 1.3 Material check in PPA report APQP and PPAP 4
M Material incoming to the production process reflected in PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 9
R Do we need issue ECN (Engineering Change Notice) towards updated Material Specification? Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
Q Change the shape of the raw material FAI AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
S Regrind Material in Medical Devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
Anonymous16-2 Dietary Supplement Raw Material/Component Storage and Production Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
H Expired packaging material - Expired unused Tyvek pouches Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
A Design History File - Not ready to share the design drawings or Bill of Material US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
D Class 3 Device - Change of supplier of material Canada Medical Device Regulations 6
D List A IVD - Change to material supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Skooma Deburring and Tolerances - Is there a Standard for deburring or removing material? Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
D Can PFMEA be used in disposition of NC material? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 4
DuncanGibbons Manufacturing Plan vs Material Specification vs Control Plan Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
Jane's Like-for-like critical raw material change qualification - type of testing/ number of lots required ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
L AS5553 Clause 3.1.7 e "Control packaging material ..................reused" AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
J Raw material certificates - CC - Safety products - Sheet metal stamping IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
C Manufacturing overages & nonconforming material documentation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Changing supplier of critical raw material (III class device) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
I Where can I beg, steal (just kidding of course) or borrow good training material on the ISO 9001:2015 standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
DMLqms Material for laboratory use or Medical Device? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
C Material from outside CER evaluation period CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
F AS9100D, raw material standards are a requirement for manufacturing? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
6 Management of SDS and Hazardous Material Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
L ASQ CBA biomedical auditor - CBA primer material is enough to study? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
DuncanGibbons Are there any aerospace specific requirements for material resource planning? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
T Was Just told we could ONLY buy material for AS9100 customers if the DISTRIBUTION house is AS9100 / AS9120 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom