MSA Manual Example of a Linearity Study

L

Luis Alves

#1
Linearity

Hi
In MSA manual an example of a linearity studie is present. My question is when they calculate the linearity they they use 6.00 for process variation. Where they find that value?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
L

Luis Alves

#3
After reading all replies another two questions occurs.
First what is the minimum and maximum value for acceptance of the equipment?
Second what should be the process variation of a measuring range of 1 to 150 mm? 74,5 is a good value?
Tanks in advance
 

Jerry Eldred

Forum Moderator
Super Moderator
#4
I haven't chimed in on this one because I don't think of myself as a guru on the statistical aspects of MSA's.

I would echo Marc's view to try this on a Statistical guru.

------------------
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#5
Since the subject of this thread is linearity,, and since linearity is a 'big' topic right now, I submit the following:

Guess I'll take a stab at this.

The first thing to consider is that during the design stage (ideally) decisions are made as to what mesaurements are to be made (inspections, tests. etc.) as well as the precision necessary. What is acceptable is determined at that time. The 'standard' is the 'old' factor of 10. So far, we are talking hypothetical. If 1 always = 1 exactly, there would be no problem - a 'perfect world'.

This said, reality comes into play. There are several considerations which we know include bias, linearity and stability.

Linearity of the Device: Linearity is how well the measurement device tracks. This is to say, if you check the device against a standard (or standards), is the bias equil along the range of the instrument scale. These concepts are illustrated in the MSA manual on pages 16 thru 18. However, there is the linearity of the device and there is the corresponding 'corruption' of the measurement process. You might think of this as an additional factor. You can graph the linearity of an instrument quite easily. In fact for a long time I argued that a compentent calibration person doesn't need to graph linearity - if you can read the numbers, linearity of the instrument is apparent (sometimes you don't need a 'picture'). This is to say, for example, you calibrate a measurement device at x points along its range against 'standards'. From this you can graph the linearity of the instrument. An arguement can be made that the calibration lab must also do an R&R against the standard(s) used and the operator(s) performing the calibrations - you have the same influences at the layout level as you do at the part measurement level.

The MSA book looks at linearity (and other factors, including bias) with consideration to the 'meassurement error' mentioned above. That is to say, the entire measurement system. If you look at linearity in the MSA book (page 35) it is appears that they want a somewhat convoluted method to be used. In fact, it also raises more questions. For example, they say you should take parts to be measured which vary over the operating range of the device. Then you take those parts and do a layout on them to determine the 'reference value' of the part. Now you have the uncertainty of the device used to do the layout involved. To be 'real' you would have to to an R&R of the layout device on that part and the appropriate dimensions.

But - what it looks like to me is that they are simply combining several sources of deviation from the defined 'reference' part values. It should be noted that since you are just taking parts and measuring them to determine their 'reference value', you are doing nothing more than making those parts 'calibration standards'. I believe they are doing this without explaining that they are assigning each part a 'reference' value based on the expectation that the layout inspection is made with an instrument with a discrimination of 100 times or more instead of the 'Factor of 10' discrimination. I see no reason (I could be wrong but please don't just say "You don't understand...", explain to us all exactly why I am wrong) why you cannot take for example, joe blocks and determine the linearity of the device.

That said, I will say that measurement of any dimension on a part with a measurement device is a possible source of error - it depends upon what is being measured and with what. Measuring (let's say with a caliper) a simple thickness of a plate is somewhat different than measuring the circumference of a shaft which is different than measuring a length on the shaft from one 'feature' to another 'feature' on a shaft (like the distance from the center of a groove on the shaft to the center of a raised ring on the shaft. In saying this I am trying o point out that some measurements are inherently not easy to make consistently - which is the reason for an R&R. As I understand it, the MSA manual wants linearity to be determined with R (repeatability) built in. I cannot say why you have to do them together, but I can accept the methodology.

------snippo-----------

> Dear Marc
>
> Subject: QS-9000 MSA Process variation
>
> I have been studying the manual once more.
>
> On page 20, see the following convoluted sentences:-
>
> "A measurement system will have adequate discrimination if its
> apparent resolution is small relative to the process variation. Thus a
> recommendation for adequate discrimination would be for the apparent
> resolution to be at most one-tenth of total process six sigma standard
> deviation instead of the traditional rule which is the apparent
> resolution be at most one-tenth of the tolerance spread." (sic)

The only thing they are doing here is changing the range from the tolerance stated to the range of the process variation.

> On page 26, appears the following sentence:-
>
> "If an index is desired, convert bias to a percentage of process
> variation (or tolerance), by multiplying 100 and dividing by the
> process variation (or tolerance)." (sic)

Well, if you want an index ;)

> Tolerance is normally given absolute boundary values on a drawing (e.
> g. +/- 0.01 mm). You are correct when you state that the tolerance
> needs to be stated as a percentage, as the bias has to be considered
> against the tolerances over the range of the instrument.
>
> If I understand the above, the tradition is that the allowable bias of
> the instrument throughout its range should be less than a tenth of the
> manufacturing tolerances.

The traditional 10x based upon the tolerance assumes certain things about the tolerance which are not always true. You and I both know that tolerancing a drawing is subject to personal whims as well as 'industry standards'. I have gotten tolerance changes on drawings many times. Some of the changes admittedly changed the required precision (resolution) of the measurement device. This is eliminated if you chose the instrument based upon the process spread.

> What is the meaning of these crucial sentences in the manual? What is
> total process six sigma standard deviation?
>
> I looked through your forum and it appears that the subject of
> "process variation" has been a problem for several years.

Yes - several years, for sure.

> Maybe the authors know the answer. I have been trying to fax Dan Reid
> and Joe Branski at GM - do you have an Email address for the MSA task
> force?
>
> Thanks for your help so far.
>
> Kind regards - John

I think the complexity introduced by the MSA book is somewhat confusing, however all is not lost. If I was being audited and linearity of a measurement device was discussed, I would explain that linearity of the device is determined during calibration of the instrument against appropriate reference standards instead of first taking a group of parts and (essentially) measuring them and making them 'standards' (that's what the deal is with their saying you have to determine each part's reference value). Now the auditor says "OK - what about where the MSA book wants you to take 5 parts and (see page 36) ..." I would answer that that is addressed during R&R studies. If you look closely at what is happening on page 36, they are simply combining two components in a way that 'You can do this at home in 1 experiment'.

I think this is an example of the major problem with the MSA book. Example: They do not talk about linearity as determined by a cal lab using instruments with a resolution of 100x or 1000x. They talk about linearity as a function of using production parts and they include repeatability. Remember that your cal lab (internal or external) should have an R study on the calibration method... As you go through the MSA book you may notice a lot of the stuff overlaps.

This said, I'll stop here and wait for some others to comment.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#7
> Dear Marc
>
> XXXXXXXX gave the telephone number of Dan Reid and Joe Branski as
> 248 857 1982 and 419 625 9575 respectively.
>
> You may be able to detect where these experts hang their hats!
>
> Regards John
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Attribute MSA-CrossTab Study Example in MSA Manual:How to compute the Expected Count? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
Crimpshrine13 MSA for a part Automated and part Manual Inspection Machine IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
B Gage R&R Criteria on page 78 MSA Reference Manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
B MSA 4th edition reference manual - Page 120-121 Clarification Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
J Definition Equipment definition - What does "equipment" mean in the AIAG MSA Manual Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
Stijloor Simple Navigation Guide for the MSA 4th Edition Manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
H Is my MSA Study Spreadsheet okay to AIAG MSA Manual 4th Edition? Using Minitab Software 18
kedarg6500 Bias Study-Finding degree of freedom-P 92 of MSA manual 4th Ed. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
V Excel Templates for MSA Study as per 4th Edition Manual Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 11
N Gauge Performance Curve - MSA Manual Page 181 (4th Edtion) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
Q Using Traceable Standards - AIAG MSA Manual Chapter II, Section B, 1st bullet Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
M MSA Manual asks for NDC higher than 5 - NDC (number of distinct categories) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
K Error in ANOVA table in the AIAG MSA manual? Table A4 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
P Is there an Errata sheet for AIAG's MSA Manual Fourth Edition Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
Rameshwar25 Manual Formula for p-value Calculation for MSA Analysis Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10
Rameshwar25 MSA Manual 4th Edition, Page 100 - What is wrong in the Linearity graph? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
T Bias Study - Use of 't' statistic - Page 88 item 8 of v4 of the MSA manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
T When is GRR (Gage R&R) required? AIAG MSA Manual Version 4 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 19
J New MSA Manual (4th Edition) - June 2010 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
Atul Khandekar MSA Reference Manual, Fourth Edition Now Available - June 2010 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 59
S AIAG MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Manual 3rd ed. Chapter IV Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
E Gage Run Chart Analysis - Page 105 MSA manual 3th edition Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
E Bias Study - How can I calculate significant 't' value? Page 87-90 of MSA manual Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 18
O Problems calculating the observed CP - Page 19, AIAG MSA manual 3rd edition Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
A Acceptable Criteria for Variable Gage R&R according to the MSA Manual 3rd Edition Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
A Is the 3rd Edition of the MSA Manual current? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
B Operator*part interaction - AIAG MSA manual indicates ANOVA Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
P AIAG SPC Manual (ver.1) Interpretations related to Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
P MSA Risk Analysis Method - MSA Manual pages 126 and 134 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9
D What does the entire process range mean? (MSA manual page 73) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
C AIAG Attribute MSA - Analytical Method - Page 135 of MSA manual 3rd edition Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 19
J Minitab 14 vs. Excel .xls spreadsheet differences? MSA Manual 3rd Edition Using Minitab Software 4
Y Measurement Systems Analysis - Effect on Process Decisions - MSA Manual page 19 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
E MSA Manual says the sum of EV,AV,GRR, and PV cannot equal 100%? Why? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
R "Gauge (Gage) R&R Studies per MSA Manual" - Customer Audit Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 13
D Calculating Bias - Is this method acceptable? MSA manual page 85 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
M D4 constant 2.58 vs. 2.57 - MSA III manual vs. SPC II manual differences Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
A Product or Process Tolerence - AIAG MSA Reference Manual 3rd edition page 3 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
F How to use Total Variation based on Process or Tolerance? Page 60 of the MSA manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
Howard Atkins Scatter plots - A way of making Excel chart scatter plots to page 106 of MSA manual Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 11
T MSA using tolerances - Page 116 of the AIAG MSA manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 30
S Bias Study Confidence Intervals - Page 88 of the AIAG MSA manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
N Is alpha in UCI LCI formula constant or depend on sample size? (MSA Manual) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
D Cp Capability Comparison - Page 19 and 20 of the 3rd edition of the MSA manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
D What the AIAG manual says about the frequency of MSA - Measurement system analysis Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 11
C 7.6.2 MSA Manual - Linearity - I can't get the "s" value Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
T Confidence Interval Of The Bias - MSA Manual 3rd Edition, Page 88 Table 3 Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
P Has K1 for GR&R's changed in AIAG 3rd ed MSA Manual? Does it affect outcome of study? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
W Seeking: MSA Procedure Template for Qual Manual Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
T TS 16949 - AIAG's MSA Manual - Thread Inspection Gage - Attribute Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom