jackerman64
Corp Quality Sys *****
We do MSA studies by gage "type".
For example: One R&R for all 6" calipers, One R&R for all 12" calipers etc
In my past experience (24 years), an R&R has been performed on each individual custom check fixture.
However, in my past, the parts were very different from each other and the custom fixtures were a combination of attribute and variable measurements.
Our QM is challenging that although the various check fixtures we have are part specific, they are still 1 gage type because they all function the same and measure the same type of part. For example, a LH wheel well splash guard and a RH wheel well splash guard and also for various vehicle models)
They are all attribute fixtures. A part is laid on the base and and then clamped. Stab pins ensure proper position. A profile site line is visually checked around the perimeter of the part and various plugs are used to check hole sizes.
Would you consider this one gage type?
In my past I would have said no but I'm trying to be open and explore the possibility that perhaps my trainer misinterpreted the requirement.
Your thoughts?
For example: One R&R for all 6" calipers, One R&R for all 12" calipers etc
In my past experience (24 years), an R&R has been performed on each individual custom check fixture.
However, in my past, the parts were very different from each other and the custom fixtures were a combination of attribute and variable measurements.
Our QM is challenging that although the various check fixtures we have are part specific, they are still 1 gage type because they all function the same and measure the same type of part. For example, a LH wheel well splash guard and a RH wheel well splash guard and also for various vehicle models)
They are all attribute fixtures. A part is laid on the base and and then clamped. Stab pins ensure proper position. A profile site line is visually checked around the perimeter of the part and various plugs are used to check hole sizes.
Would you consider this one gage type?
In my past I would have said no but I'm trying to be open and explore the possibility that perhaps my trainer misinterpreted the requirement.
Your thoughts?