Necessity of Calibration of Manufacturing Process Equipment Gages, Controllers, Etc.

Ajit Basrur

Staff member
Admin
#1
Hi all,

Need your advise - for our injection molding machines, there are lot of gauges indicating various values for say temperatures, pressures etc.

Our current practise is to calibrate all gauges, which i think is a overkill. When I proposed this reduced calibration frequency to the management, they told that our Customers may not accept this. They donot want any observations from any of our customers on calibration as it impacts product quality directly.

Can I have ideas from the forum suggesting how can we reduce this calibration overkill ? If I could have any procedures supporting the reduced calibration (with justification) is also most welcome.

Thanks,
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Re: Necessity for calibration

Hi, Qualityalways - always good questions!

The simple answer is that unless the gauge is used to make a decision about the 'quality' of the product or process - which affects product quality - (to spec), then it probably doesn't need calibrating. So a temperature may be important to a mold cavity, but the water pressure on the cold side of the mold, may not be so important to a good molded product. The screw pressure would be important to a complete fill, etc.

Often, a lot of the process equipment gauges are to indicate the presence of a particular utlility parameter, such as air pressure. The actual pressure value isn't always so important, as much as simply the presence of the air pressure.

Of course, if you find the potential cost savings, then that'll sell it!

You may, unfortunately, still get a finding from your customer, because they might not understand this reasoning. If not already part of your calibration process, you should write exclusion statements with a justification for the equipment not being in the cal. system.

Good luck.

Andy
 

Ajit Basrur

Staff member
Admin
#3
Re: Necessity for calibration

Hi, Qualityalways - always good questions!

The simple answer is that unless the gauge is used to make a decision about the 'quality' of the product or process - which affects product quality - (to spec), then it probably doesn't need calibrating. So a temperature may be important to a mold cavity, but the water pressure on the cold side of the mold, may not be so important to a good molded product. The screw pressure would be important to a complete fill, etc.
Thanks Andy. Just to top up your comment, if a particular is "quality impacting" for one product but not for other product, we cover both gauges for calibration, right ?:thanx:
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#5
Re: Necessity for calibration

Nice answer, Andy.

Many times equipment like Injection molding machines and others are made with multiple, various gauges of all sorts. They indicate all kinds of pressures, temperatures, etc. for the different components on the equipment. Many of these gauges serve as diagnostic tools for service/troubleshooting, but not really quality assessments. In my experience, most of these gauges have For Reference Only on them.

Now, in my opinion, the necessity for calibration will depend. If you are using the gauges to assess a quality impact, then they should be calibrated. For example, "do not begin injection process until nozzle four gauge reads between 300 and 310", then I would say that gauge needs to be calibrated. If the operator starts the equipment up, lets it heat up, and as long as plastic is flowing at a consistent rate they start production, then I would say calibration is not required.

That is to the question of whether to calibrate or not.

Calibration frequency is another matter. First, determine if your requirements will allow a different frequency. Next, determine the impact if you extend the date. Do you have a final product inspection or something, where the gauge readings really don't matter? Then I would say the impact is small. Also, have these gauges been consistently passing calibration, with little or no adjustment? Are there any customer expectations?

Given all that, you might could build a case for extending the time frame with management.

To Andy's follow up question: I would keep a cautious eye on calibrating machine #1 and #2, but not calibrating machine #3 and #4. It will be difficult to assure that critical parts were not produced on #1 and 2.

However, the last suggestion is mere speculation on my part. Anyway, hope there is something here to help.
 

Ajit Basrur

Staff member
Admin
#6
Re: Necessity for calibration

Many times equipment like Injection molding machines and others are made with multiple, various gauges of all sorts. They indicate all kinds of pressures, temperatures, etc. for the different components on the equipment. Many of these gauges serve as diagnostic tools for service/troubleshooting, but not really quality assessments. In my experience, most of these gauges have For Reference Only on them.

Now, in my opinion, the necessity for calibration will depend. If you are using the gauges to assess a quality impact, then they should be calibrated. For example, "do not begin injection process until nozzle four gauge reads between 300 and 310", then I would say that gauge needs to be calibrated. If the operator starts the equipment up, lets it heat up, and as long as plastic is flowing at a consistent rate they start production, then I would say calibration is not required.

That is to the question of whether to calibrate or not.

Calibration frequency is another matter. First, determine if your requirements will allow a different frequency. Next, determine the impact if you extend the date. Do you have a final product inspection or something, where the gauge readings really don't matter? Then I would say the impact is small. Also, have these gauges been consistently passing calibration, with little or no adjustment? Are there any customer expectations?

Given all that, you might could build a case for extending the time frame with management.

To Andy's follow up question: I would keep a cautious eye on calibrating machine #1 and #2, but not calibrating machine #3 and #4. It will be difficult to assure that critical parts were not produced on #1 and 2.

However, the last suggestion is mere speculation on my part. Anyway, hope there is something here to help.
Bred, thanks for the valuable suggestions.

Tell me more..an example, please.

Andy
Andy, unfortunately I donot have off-hand now. Our Operations guys often say that the quality impacting parameters of the machine for one part may not be quality impacting parameters on the same machine for another part.

Could this be possible ?
 
#7
Re: Necessity for calibration

Bred, thanks for the valuable suggestions.



Andy, unfortunately I donot have off-hand now. Our Operations guys often say that the quality impacting parameters of the machine for one part may not be quality impacting parameters on the same machine for another part.

Could this be possible ?
It is possible, I guess, but improbable. It could be a design related issue. I have experience of a part where a particular defect was caused due to a process parameter, but the defect didn't occur on other parts because they weren't a similar design.

Otherwise, I'm thinking that these guys are using voodoo to run their processes:lmao:

Andy
 

Ajit Basrur

Staff member
Admin
#8
Re: Necessity for calibration

It is possible, I guess, but improbable. It could be a design related issue. I have experience of a part where a particular defect was caused due to a process parameter, but the defect didn't occur on other parts because they weren't a similar design.

Otherwise, I'm thinking that these guys are using voodoo to run their processes:lmao:

Andy
Thanks Andy, on Monday will call a meeting with operations guys and see if I could get some more info. Have a nice weekend.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Necessity of external watchdog next to internal watchdog ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
D The necessity of a SECONDARY CIRCUITS in ME EQUIPMENT (IEC 60601-1) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 8
S Necessity of Legal Register to conform to ISO 9001, ISO 14001, IATF 16949 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 6
M Interview question - IMS (Integrated Management Systems) a necessity or an ISO mistake? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 10
V P2, P3, P4 Necessity in regular VDA 6.3 Process Audits VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 4
D Necessity of Expanded GR&R for Multiple Test Systems Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
I Is ISO 14001 A 'nice to have' or a necessity? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 4
B Is there a necessity of two sets of KPIs for Delivery Process Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 15
M Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) Testing: A necessity on every lot? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
A Internal Audit Schedule Updates - Necessity of a revision date on the schedule Internal Auditing 8
S PPAP and Interchangeability - Necessity to re-PPAP when making an Engineering Change APQP and PPAP 5
lanley liao Question regarding the calibration of monitoring and measure equipment. Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
N IATF Calibration Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 3
Q Do these certificates of calibration meet ISO 9001 requirements for traceability to NIST? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
T Plug Gage Calibration Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 1
M Load Cell Calibration using a totalizer on a flow meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
E Calibration Records needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
D Limited Range Calibration - 5000 lb Industrial floor scale General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D Calibration of Small Scales General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 26
C How to Establish the Calibration & Measurement Capability (CMC)? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
I IQOQ or just initial calibration required? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
B Calibration in real life ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
J Calibration cycle for monitoring & measuring tools used in medical device manufacturing General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
A Is calibration of test weight required General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
S Calibration Frequency for Slip Gauge Kit used for CMM Calibration? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
S Calibration/Verification of customer fixtures IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
Ron Rompen Calibration by manufacturer ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
Q Calibration verification records 7.1.5.2.1 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
W Next Calibration Due Date Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
S Where do l get calibration standards to run a calibration lab? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
A OEM On-Site Calibration issues during Covid19 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Calibration Certificate Result issued by an accredited external laboratory General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
G Calibration of "Master Parts" Used as Gauges Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
R Calibration lab environmental monitoring General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
G Calibration of Rotronic probe but not digital readout? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
F Standard Calibration Procedures: Recommended Practice ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
T Temperature Requirements For In House Calibration - AS9100 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 16
B Gage calibration frequency, ISO and IATF - What are the requirements Calibration Frequency (Interval) 3
Crimpshrine13 Laboratory Scope - Calibration vs. Test Methods - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Crimpshrine13 Calibration of pH Meter Probe Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
F ESD workbench "calibration" Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
C Correct Calibration Method for Dial Depth Gage General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
F Nist traceable calibration certificates General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
G Tool tracebility and First calibration requirements for aerospace (AS9100) organisation AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
D Calibration of Digital thermometer with surface probe General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
T Calibration or Verification -> Cm and Cmk, etc. Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 3
G Is repeatability required for equipment calibration? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
was named killer AS 9100D - Calibration Instructions - Controlled documents? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom