Need advice on what inspection equipment to buy.

Tyler

Involved In Discussions
Our company has been able to get away with having pretty rudimentary inspection equipment; however, we have decided that now is the time to invest in new inspection equipment to both increase the throughput of our QC department as well as increase our inspection capabilities. We don't have an unlimited budget, so I am looking for a solution or combination of solutions that would give us the most bang for our buck.

The parts we currently make don't need a CMM. Most of the stuff we make is relatively small (e.g., fits within 4" x 4" x 4" space) and 90% of the features can be measured using 2d measurement system (e.g., optical comparator). Because of this, we have been interested in Keyence's IM-8000 series. It is pretty dang quick and has the ability to measure hundreds of features over several different parts in a matter of seconds. This would seriously improve our inspection throughput. The only drawback is it is pretty expensive. I have seen similar systems that appear to be less expensive (e.g., Starret's AVR series, Mitutoyo's Quick Vision series), but I'm not sure how they stack up against the IM-8000. If anyone has some experience with these products I'd be curious to know how they stand up next to each other.

The other thing to consider is whether there is something out there that could both improve inspection throughput and give us full 3D inspection capabilities at a similar price point to the IM. I know there are multi sensor CMMs out there that combine the speed of non-contact measurement with a tactile probe. Such a system would grant us the capability to inspect pretty much anything a customer would ask that is within the work envelope of the CMM, but we'd probably lose out on the speed of the IM-8000.

A final consideration would be if there is some combination of both a 2D vision system and 3D measuring system that come in at about the same price point as the IM-8000. As far as I can tell, the IM-8000 looks to be considerably more expensive than competing products. We don't really need the cream of the crop 3D measuring system here, just a reliable entry-level system.

All feedback is helpful.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Keyence machine are perty good but like you said, are very expensive. The only bad thing about keyence machines is that when measuring stamped parts whith various forms is not 100% accurate. If the part is machine is more straight perfect part and it will measure it better, and another thing i never measure holes with the keyence because it will not measure it correctly, i just use gage pins. Other than that the keyence machine is perty good, we have one.
 
and another thing i never measure holes with the keyence because it will not measure it correctly

Wow, that is surprising to me. Thanks for the info though. We are going to have Keyence stop by tomorrow so I will make sure to grab some parts that really test the deficiencies you are talking about.
 
I had good luck with a Micro Vu vision system which does 3D. Also, a Faro type arm with a scanner is handy.
 
What type of parts are you needing to measure? Stamped metal?

Yeah. We do a lot of flat patterns or parts that have a well defined profile.

I had good luck with a Micro Vu vision system which does 3D. Also, a Faro type arm with a scanner is handy.

I have looked at the Faro arm before. They are pretty cool. The only concerns I would have would be with respect to accuracy and repeatability. Have you had success using this for final product acceptance?

We did end up getting the Keyence machine. It is pretty cool. It is very fast and easy to use. The drawback is that it is really only useful for measuring flat patterns and/or thin parts. GD&T functions on thicker parts would not be reliable as the machine measures edges of a profile as opposed to part surfaces.
 
Back
Top Bottom