| Section (AS9100/ISO Clause) | Content Focus (Condensed) | Key Integration Points |
| 0. Introduction | Quality Policy Statement, Scope of the QMS (Clearly define the combined entity, stating the inclusion of AS9100-registered service activities and ISO/IEC 17025-accredited calibration activities), Exclusions (if any, with justification). | Scope: Explicitly cite both standards. The scope is what ties the two certifications together. |
| 1. Normative References | List of applicable standards (AS9100, ISO 17025, ISO 9001, relevant regulatory/statutory requirements). | References: Critical to show compliance with both sets of rules. |
| 2. Terms and Definitions | Definitions unique to Aerospace/AS9100 (e.g., Critical Items, Product Safety, Counterfeit Parts) and unique to Calibration/17025 (e.g., Impartiality, Measurement Traceability, Measurement Uncertainty). | Clarity: Ensures a common understanding across the merged teams. |
| 3. Context of the Organization | | |
| 4.1 Understanding the Organization & its Context | Internal/External Issues relevant to both service delivery (AS9100) and laboratory operations (17025). | Risk/Opportunity: Address the risks common to both entities (e.g., personnel competence, loss of accreditation/certification). |
| 4.2 Needs & Expectations of Interested Parties | Identify parties like Customers (Aerospace & Calibration), Regulatory Bodies (e.g., FAA, accreditation bodies), and accreditation bodies (e.g., A2LA, ANAB). | Regulatory: Recognize the distinct compliance requirements for each certification. |
| 4.3 Scope of the QMS (Formal) | Formal documented scope statement for the Integrated QMS. | Single Document, Dual Scopes: Defines the boundaries for both the QMS and the lab's technical activities. |
| 4.4 Quality Management System | General QMS processes and their interactions. | |
| 5. Leadership | | |
| 5.1 Leadership & Commitment | Top Management's commitment to both the service quality (AS9100) and the technical competence/impartiality of the lab (17025). | Commitment: Must satisfy the top management requirements of both standards. |
| 6. Planning | | |
| 6.1 Actions to Address Risks & Opportunities | Risk Management approach (FMEAs for service, Risk-Based Thinking for QMS, and Specific Impartiality Risk for the lab). | Risk: Detail the specific risk management for Impartiality as required by ISO 17025. |
| 6.2 Quality Objectives & Planning | Objectives for service performance (on-time delivery, customer satisfaction) and lab performance (turnaround time, measurement uncertainty targets). | Measurement: Objectives must cover both sides of the business. |
| 7. Support | | |
| 7.1 Resources** & Personnel | Personnel Competence: Unified system for training, qualification, and competency specific to job function (including the unique technical requirements of 17025 personnel). Infrastructure: Description of the facilities, including the specific laboratory environment/conditions (17025 requirement). | Resource Integration: The lab's specific technical resources (equipment, reference materials) are critical 17025 details that must be fully integrated here. |
| 7.1.5 Monitoring & Measuring Resources | Calibration & Traceability: This entire section is where the ISO 17025 metrological traceability and calibration program must be fully detailed (or referenced to a procedure). | Metrology: This is where the 17025 depth is mandatory. |
| 7.5 Documented Information | Control of documentation for QMS Procedures (AS9100) and Technical Records / Measurement Data (17025). | Documentation: Address the control of the Quality Manual, SOPs, and the specific Technical Records (e.g., raw data, calibration certificates). |
| 8. Operation | | |
| 8.1 Operational Planning & Control | Integrated process flow for receiving customer orders, planning service work, and scheduling calibration work. | Process Alignment: Show how the service company's request for calibration becomes the lab's input. |
| 8.2 Requirements for Products & Services | Contract Review: Ensuring the lab can meet measurement requirements (17025) and the service company can meet delivery/regulatory requirements (AS9100). | Customer Focus: Address the distinct requirements for quoting a service job vs. quoting a calibration job. |
| 8.5 Control of External Providers | Supplier Approval: Supplier selection for both aerospace-related suppliers (AS9100 emphasis on risk/counterfeit) and subcontracted calibration services (17025 requirement). | Supplier: The unique 17025 need to control subcontracted lab work must be in this section. |
| 8.6 Release of Products & Services | Product Release (AS9100 service completion) and Reporting Results (ISO 17025 calibration certificate/report contents). | Output: Crucially, this section addresses the specific 17025 requirements for the content of the calibration report (e.g., measurement uncertainty, conformity statements). |
| 9. Performance Evaluation | | |
| 9.1 Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis, & Evaluation | Audits, Measurement Uncertainty calculation and monitoring (17025), Process efficiency (AS9100), and Customer Satisfaction surveys. | Data Validity: The lab's specific technical data validation processes belong here (e.g., use of reference materials, inter-laboratory comparisons). |
| 9.3 Management Review | Review Inputs: Must include data on aerospace service performance and lab technical performance (e.g., impartiality, validity of results, resource adequacy). | Review: Ensure the review addresses both standards completely. |
| 10. Improvement | | |
| 10.2 Nonconformity & Corrective Action | Unified process for Nonconforming Service/Product (AS9100) and Nonconforming Work (17025). | CARs: Use a single, integrated CAR system that addresses both QMS nonconformities and technical nonconforming lab work. |