J
Our company is releasing a new electronics measurement device. Let me know if the following has any traceability gaps. I feel uneasy with this....
1. We are the OEM for item "A" (DUT)
2. Item "A" requires calibration
3. Our engineering dept. designed a calibration device (standard) to calibrate item "A" (DUT)
4. This calibration device (standard) obtains power from item "A" (DUT)
(CAN WE CALIBRATE EQUIPMENT WE MANUFACTURE WITH EQUIPMENT WE MANUFACTURE?)
What does Fluke do?
I value being able to utilize established standards such as oscilloscopes/dmm's/function generators but our engineers are trying to eliminate the need for such. Does the above "plan" fit within NIST Traceability requirements?
Your opinions and comments are extremely welcome!
thanks!
1. We are the OEM for item "A" (DUT)
2. Item "A" requires calibration
3. Our engineering dept. designed a calibration device (standard) to calibrate item "A" (DUT)
4. This calibration device (standard) obtains power from item "A" (DUT)
(CAN WE CALIBRATE EQUIPMENT WE MANUFACTURE WITH EQUIPMENT WE MANUFACTURE?)
What does Fluke do?
I value being able to utilize established standards such as oscilloscopes/dmm's/function generators but our engineers are trying to eliminate the need for such. Does the above "plan" fit within NIST Traceability requirements?
Your opinions and comments are extremely welcome!
thanks!
Last edited by a moderator: