Re: TS16949 & QS-9000 Gap Analysis
Antoine,
Okay, I get that the Checklist (Yes/No) does not reflect a Process Approach to auditing, but how can you say that the QSA for ISO/TS-16949 was never meant to be used for TS? Are you saying like Howard, that the checklist was only a companion document to be used with the Rules for TS Registration Scheme?
Am I getting it now - Guys?
Thanks,
Doug
The QSA book you have available was never intended to be used for ISO TS.
It was released besides QS9000 and to be used for QS9000 environments.
Indeed the QSA lives as long as QS9000 lives.
For ISO TS ( based on the process approach of ISO 9001 version 2000 ) this QSA should have never been used. Look at my previous post # 10.
For ISO TS you have to use the process approach (instead of the item approach like in the QSA )
Best regards,
Antoine
It was released besides QS9000 and to be used for QS9000 environments.
Indeed the QSA lives as long as QS9000 lives.
For ISO TS ( based on the process approach of ISO 9001 version 2000 ) this QSA should have never been used. Look at my previous post # 10.
For ISO TS you have to use the process approach (instead of the item approach like in the QSA )
Best regards,
Antoine
Antoine,
Okay, I get that the Checklist (Yes/No) does not reflect a Process Approach to auditing, but how can you say that the QSA for ISO/TS-16949 was never meant to be used for TS? Are you saying like Howard, that the checklist was only a companion document to be used with the Rules for TS Registration Scheme?
Am I getting it now - Guys?
Thanks,
Doug
Last edited: