SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

Non-conformances due to Human Error

N

nurhakim

#1
Hi,

I would like to get your opinion regarding this. Recently we receive a complaint regarding packing defect which is-product was packed in different size boxes.
We investigate and come to conclusion that it was due to human error when no evidenced from QC & QA records showed that we experience such defects.

So our corrective action was retraining of operators. However it seems that customer is still not happy with the solution. How far do you think that this CA is acceptable and can satisfy the customer, with the fact that it will not reoccur in the future.

Thanks,
Nur
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Chennaiite

Never-say-die
Trusted Information Resource
#2
Hi,

I would like to get your opinion regarding this. Recently we receive a complaint regarding packing defect which is-product was packed in different size boxes.
We investigate and come to conclusion that it was due to human error when no evidenced from QC & QA records showed that we experience such defects.

So our corrective action was retraining of operators. However it seems that customer is still not happy with the solution. How far do you think that this CA is acceptable and can satisfy the customer, with the fact that it will not reoccur in the future.

Thanks,
Nur
Train your Operator thousand times or even more. Still on a given day such errors could happen, because Training plugs lack of awareness and not lapse of concentration which let us agree that cannot be completely eliminated. The best option is to make your process insensitive to lapse of concentration.
Some food for thought:
Why not standardize box sizes?
What business the different size box had in the location where you packed this product?
Why was it not detected before delivery?
Ask the operator, he might have some ideas too.
 
H

Hileen

#3
Train your Operator thousand times or even more. Still on a given day such errors could happen, because Training plugs lack of awareness and not lapse of concentration which let us agree that cannot be completely eliminated. The best option is to make your process insensitive to lapse of concentration.
Some food for thought:
Why not standardize box sizes?
What business the different size box had in the location where you packed this product?
Why was it not detected before delivery?
Ask the operator, he might have some ideas too.
Is there a dedicated material list for the specific product that was packed? Were the different size cartons issued incorrectly from the store? Item numbers? Are checks in place to check all dry goods issued to production line prior to start- up of production?
 
R

RLewing

#4
Hi, Nurhakim

There might be several other things you could do - depending on your case, but the first question is: How much costs to the customer comes from this potentially repeating error? Is it worth additional preventive costs?

You might consider poka yoke (Mistake Proofing) by designing boxes that can only have the correct product and number (if possible). Or having "more eyes" - a separate person bringing in the products and the packing material, which then needs to be checked by the packer. Or having a separate out of the box audit (OBA) at the end, that is someone coming finally and opening and checking one random package.

But first, think of what is the cost of error?

BR Raimo
 
N

nurhakim

#5
Train your Operator thousand times or even more. Still on a given day such errors could happen, because Training plugs lack of awareness and not lapse of concentration which let us agree that cannot be completely eliminated. The best option is to make your process insensitive to lapse of concentration.
Some food for thought:
Why not standardize box sizes?
What business the different size box had in the location where you packed this product?
Why was it not detected before delivery?
Ask the operator, he might have some ideas too.
Hi,

thanks for your speedy thought, all boxes are well identified with size, it is just the matter of operators' awareness in picking up the correct product size to pack inside the correctly issued boxes.

In this case, of course, there is possibility that the workplace is not organized in such a way that the product can be well identified (e.g. labeling), thus causing this error.

But how far retraining can be the best solution, and customer are willing to accept it. So far other initiatives taken was-1) reorganize the work place, 2) labeling for identification 3) checklists for verification by the operators that they are using correct box and product.

Thanks,
Nur
 

harry

Super Moderator
#6
.............................. We investigate and come to conclusion that it was due to human error when ...................
Not sure about elsewhere but in Malaysia, this seems to be a favorite excuse probably because the operators are at the end of the queue of a finger pointing exercise.

which is-product was packed in different size boxes. .......................
This is evidence that there should be a few more 'whys' after human error


..................... However it seems that customer is still not happy with the solution. ...............
I think customers are not interested in what appears like a 'blame game' but would like to see some things done at the system level to prevent or at least minimize the occurrence of similar cases in the future. The other posts above do contain some good suggestions.
 
Last edited:

AMIT BALLAL

Trusted Information Resource
#7
Hi!!!!!!

Human error cannot be the root cause, as you need to work on error proofing so that errors cannot be made by a human. If anything goes wrong, it means system has failed somewhere (Not human).

If you think, "Operator was not aware about how to perform a specific task", then ask further why : " Why training was not given to the operator? ". Then you might get the root cause / if not ask further why to find out the final root cause.

I hope this might help!

Thanks,
Amit
 
C

ckillam3

#8
What is the answer when the operator ignores the instruction or chooses to perform the task differently than the instruction?
 

AMIT BALLAL

Trusted Information Resource
#9
What is the answer when the operator ignores the instruction or chooses to perform the task differently than the instruction?
Ask why further: "Why he didn't follow the instruction / procedure?" Again, if you take action on cause: "Operator didn't follow the instruction", your problem won't get solved & will repeat again. It would be a disposition action, not a corrective action- as it is not the root cause.


Thanks,
Amit
 

somashekar

Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
Hi,

thanks for your speedy thought, all boxes are well identified with size, it is just the matter of operators' awareness in picking up the correct product size to pack inside the correctly issued boxes.

In this case, of course, there is possibility that the workplace is not organized in such a way that the product can be well identified (e.g. labeling), thus causing this error.

But how far retraining can be the best solution, and customer are willing to accept it. So far other initiatives taken was-1) reorganize the work place, 2) labeling for identification 3) checklists for verification by the operators that they are using correct box and product.

Thanks,
Nur
Retraining is a constant reinforcement, and as the world keeps on changing, what is good today may not be good tomorrow.
Retraining is always supportive, but a higher level corrective action is a system level corrective action.
Let us be sure that we are not here to eliminate human error, but to put in systems which helps people to do tasks (productive tasks) with minimum of induced errors.
Remember that if a boatman wants to sink his boat, there is no need of any hole in the boat which would sink it. A good boatman will certainly try to save the boat even if a hole appeares. Our corrective actions should plug as many holes as discovered securely and also see situations where a hole can likely happen in future and prevent it from happening.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Non-Conformances Found After 3rd Party Sorting Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 12
G Addressing Non-Conformances from an Internal Audit that are not product related ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
G Question about Non-conformances during New Product Introduction Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
qualprod Internal Audits - Categories of non conformances Internal Auditing 12
Ed Panek Are audit non conformances also risk based? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
E Example of 9001:2015 audit report with non-conformances ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
N Non-conformances whilst in the Design and Development stage of a project ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
M Corrective action on Non-conformances from a long time ago ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
D Consequences of Major Non-Conformances during a Registration Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
E Non-Conformances and the Relevant ISO 9001 Paragraph Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
P Losing Accreditation - JAS-ANZ has changed the conditions of non-conformances ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
T How many complaints, defects and non-conformances are typical? Customer Complaints 5
P Complaints vs. Non Conformances - When is a Complaint a Nonconformance? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
P Objecting to Registrar Audit Non-conformances General Auditing Discussions 43
K Cost of Supplier Non-conformances Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
S Root Cause Analysis Taxonomy - Categorising the reasons for non-conformances ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
N Supplier Non Conformances - Format for a Supplier Rejection Form ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
L Do ALL non conformances have to be documented? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
V Management Review Meeting - Statistics for Customer Complaints and Non Conformances ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
C Internal Audit Concerns including Escalation of Non-Conformances General Auditing Discussions 6
D Non-Conformances in a Service based industry with no product Service Industry Specific Topics 9
P Interpreting the Process Gap - Open Non-Conformances & ISO Clause ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
M Pharmaceutical Non conformances SOP - Solid oral dose start up company Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
B Internal Audits save you from Non-Conformances on external audits? General Auditing Discussions 16
B 19011 - Reporting Non-conformances: Grading of findings ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
S Examples of Non-conformances during ISO/TS 16949 pre/final audits IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S Priorizing Non-conformances - What is the best way? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6
J QS-9000 System redesign - Several Major non-conformances - Where to start? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 8
M Changing Investigational Device from Non-Sterile to Sterile - what are the implications? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 3
K Is Calibration Required for Non-Adjustable Commercial Inspection Devices? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
J Informal vs formal scope creep... managing non-medical devices through system processes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
G Not accepting a non conformity during an audit General Auditing Discussions 11
J In-house (NHS) manufacture and use (by staff) of non-medical devices.. any regulations apply? UK Medical Device Regulations 6
B Does FDA Registration QSR need to cover non-medical devices for contract repackager? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
A Brexit Mandate for EU Authorised Representative for non medical devices CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 7
E Accredited vs. non-accredited labs for 60601 compliance in the US IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
E Accredited vs. non-accredited labs for 60601 compliance in the US Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
C Non-sterile reusable surgical instruments - FDA sterilization requirement Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
L Water requirement for Non-sterile topical OTCs Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
B Procedure packs with non-medical devices EU Medical Device Regulations 1
W Non Sterile Medical Device Environmental Tests Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
S Advice on how to reduce overhead of handling non-conforming material Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
G Team to analyze a non conformance Customer Complaints 26
J Promoting and marketing of a non approved device 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
G 0 non conformities in registrar audits over 4 years Management Review Meetings and related Processes 12
K CE Marking Class 1 (Non sterile) medical device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
M Supplier requirements - Major supplier is a Non-Profit registered with ICCBBA (FDA UDI) Supply Chain Security Management Systems 12
S Non parametric test for semi-quantitative data. Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
B Free Sales Certificate for Non Medical Devices Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
P Ppk results shown as asterisk after the transformation of Non-normal data Using Minitab Software 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom