Non-Conformity Report from Notified Body - MEDDEV Guide is not Legally Binding

Roland chung

Trusted Information Resource
#1
Hello All,

Since the MEDDEV guide is not legally binding, I can challenge nonconformity issued by NB, like clinical evaluation does not take into account the MEDDEV 2.7/1 revision 4. Is that right?

Best regards,
Roland
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#2
You can, but particularly in the case of the Clinical Evaluation MEDDEV, which seems to be pushed by the Competent Authorities, I don't think it's worth it because you will probably only waste time and you will have to comply anyway (that's what's been happening with several of my clients).
 
Last edited:

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#3
Did you ask the auditor, during the debriefing/exit meeting why was s/he issuing a nonconformity against something other than a requirement?

Did you try to dialogue with the auditor? The whole audit experience has to be a two-way street to add value.
 
Last edited:

Remus

Involved In Discussions
#4
It is easier to refer standards guidences rather than writing everything. Anyway, harmonised standards and Meddev guidances are mandatory for NB's not manufacturers.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#5
Did you ask the auditor, during the debriefing/exit meeting why was s/he issuing a nonconformity against something other than a requirement?

Did you try to dialogue with the auditor? The whole audit experience has to be a two-way street to add value.
No disrespect, but with NB medical device audits the purpose is not to add value but rather to verify a certain minimum (though I wonder how many would admit it).
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#6
harmonised standards and Meddev guidances are mandatory for NB's not manufacturers.
This is an interesting statement that I don't fully understand. As far as I know they are officially voluntary for all. Additionally, I don't understand how, practically, some guidance can be mandatory for a NB without it affecting the manufacturer (ie how can the NB follow it to the letter without requiring the manufacturer to do the same).
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#7
The problem with the EU clinical evaluation is that the current regulatory requirements are so general and ambiguous that there is no practical way to decisively and directly show either compliance or noncompliance. Practically a detailed guide such as the MEDDEV is necessary, and thus it became de-facto regulation. NBs don't have the ability to judge the clinical evaluation other than by comparison with the MEDDEV. Rev 4 is more demanding than rev 3 and this might seem overbearing, but it's actually a result of yet some ambiguity / uncertainty that were inherent to rev 3.

A similar example would be EN 60601 for medical electrical equipment.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#8
No disrespect, but with NB medical device audits the purpose is not to add value but rather to verify a certain minimum (though I wonder how many would admit it).
Confirming compliance with regulatory requirements and approving the product to be traded in the EU does not add value to the manufacturer? :confused:
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#9
Confirming compliance with regulatory requirements and approving the product to be traded in the EU does not add value to the manufacturer? :confused:
I didn't say it doesn't add value, just that adding value is not the purpose. The purpose is to verify a certain minimum. Apparently having such minimum verified represents added value as compared with not having that minimum verified, but since "adding value" (in the general sense) is not the driver but rather the result the process runs out of fuel as soon as the minimum is verified.

In the specific context of clinical evaluation it is apparently simpler and easier for the NB to verify regulatory compliance through compliance with the MEDDEV, than through any other method, so there's no drive on their part to "have a dialogue" or to add value beyond the bare regulatory minimum. At most they would provide clarification, and I would venture a guess that it would go along the lines of MEDDEV being state of the art and so on and so forth.
 

Remus

Involved In Discussions
#10
This is an interesting statement that I don't fully understand. As far as I know they are officially voluntary for all. Additionally, I don't understand how, practically, some guidance can be mandatory for a NB without it affecting the manufacturer (ie how can the NB follow it to the letter without requiring the manufacturer to do the same).
For instance EN ISO 13485, all NB have to prepare its documentation then audit Manufacturers QMS according to EN ISO 13485 otherwise EC won't designate them.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Auditing a Contractor in EMS and Non Conformity Report General Auditing Discussions 1
L Non Conformity (Nonconformance) Report & Preventive Action Requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
L Completed Non-conformity report examples needed! ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
G Dealing with non conformity caused by Supplier Components detected in the production line IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8
S Can we provide training plan as corrective action for IATF 16949 Non conformity? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
qualprod Non conformity, do nothing? Employee experiencing "hard times" ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 26
D Root Cause on Non-Conformity Against Quality Manual Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 9
A IATF 16949 - Non-conformity on 5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
B IATF 16949: Definition Major/Minor Non-conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
E Non Conformity due to Outsourced Internal Audit Error ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
J Non-Conformity Overreach - We recently switched our EU Authorized Representative ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
B A question of Non-conformity specifics - AQAP2120 (The MOD's equivalent to ISO9001) General Auditing Discussions 1
Q Non Conformity of Support Processes - Need another NC form? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Q Non Conformity in Audit: Missing Deputy Rule ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
S Internal Audit - Non conformity not easily fixable (Sales and Contracts) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 30
S Some departments don't have Quality Objectives - Non Conformity? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 68
S HR Manager refusing to create Quality Objectives - Is this a Non-Conformity? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 11
H Product Non-Conformity and Document Change Request Forms - Corrective Action needed? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 16
A Declaration of Conformity for non-CE Mark products CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
Q How do you define repeated non conformity (aka Recurrence)? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 24
T A confusing Non-conformity - No defined QMS processes intended for 'Management' ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
A Non-EU countries who use your EC Certificate & Declaration of Conformity Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
eternal_atlas Identification of ISO 9001 Clause to a specific Non-Conformity General Auditing Discussions 7
C Show cause letter given as a result of a minor non-conformity raised by CB Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
T Non-conformity - Not performing Supplier Development on one specific supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 25
A Communicating to our employees: consequences to customer of non-conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
D TS 16949: 2002 section 7.6.1 - MSA non conformity at registration audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
K Major Non-Conformity During Initial TS16949 Audit Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2
M Record Falsification - What clause to raise a non-conformity? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 20
M Who are the go to companies for non-destructive hardness testing? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
R Non conformance (NC) or Corrective & Preventive action (CAPA) CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 7
M How does IEC-60601-1 apply to a non-medical device in the patient vicinity? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
A FDA guidance on non-sterile Medical Device Packaging Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
E Qualification for non gmp service providers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
R MDD x PPE Directive - Statement of Non-Applicability EU Medical Device Regulations 3
B Exclusions or justification for non-applicability of IEC standards Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
C Non-EU Language Requirements Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
A Non-Conformances Found After 3rd Party Sorting Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 12
T ISO 13485 8.3 - Non-Conforming Materials - on-line rework or part of process? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
N Audit non-compliance API Q1 - Use of External Documents 4.4.4 in Product Realization Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 5
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
N Competent Authority notification for non-EU manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M CE marking for NON-EU EU Medical Device Regulations 0
E Non-GMP examples in Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 2
blile Increasing PFMEA occurrence ranking after non-conformance FMEA and Control Plans 4
S Non-Conformance and Deviations ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
B Risk Assessment Checklist for Non product Software IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 1
T Ideas for developing a Supplier Quality Management System, non automotive ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
N Audit non-compliance - API Spec Q1 9th Ed 5.6.1.2 b Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
R Applicability of new non-harmonized standards (MDD/MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 8

Similar threads

Top Bottom