What are we doing now, practicing Machiavellism? The ends justify the means? It doesn't matter how you do it or why, just get it done? "Procedure? Yeah, we have a procedure, but my way is better" or "Procedure, yeah I wrote it, but it really doesn't matter how you do it".........Wow, loads of fun possibilities here.
Another great new concept...."Hey guys, don't bother showing me how it's supposed to be done just show me how you really do it. All that written stuff just gets in the way of your production anyway"
Or better yet to really save time..."Just show me what you made, all those written particulars aren't that important anyway because the guy that wrote them may be wrong"
Another great new concept...."Hey guys, don't bother showing me how it's supposed to be done just show me how you really do it. All that written stuff just gets in the way of your production anyway"
Or better yet to really save time..."Just show me what you made, all those written particulars aren't that important anyway because the guy that wrote them may be wrong"
You're correct, we don't know. Hence the purpose of a good QMS in the first place is to minimize ambiguity and confusion. It may matter/ may not matter, and it might be worthwhile to specify as such. This is a work instruction: do this; and do it this way; don't do this; use this, etc. It should be clear and accurate. If this work instruction is ambiguous, how many more of the work instructions are written with the same level of ambiguity?