Notified Body not issuing 'Improvement Potentials' anymore (ISO 13485)

L

Luwak

#1
At the end of our latest ISO 13485 audit we only received nonconformities and no improvement potentials as they were called earlier by the same notified body. Improvement potentials were non-binding pieces of advise as they were/are issued by most notified bodies I believe. Although I always wondered why improvement potentials were not classified as nonconformities they were usually useful pieces of advise and in some cases an 'early warning' that could be used to prevent future nonconformities.

The auditor mentioned that they stopped formulating improvement potentials because they raised too many questions about why they were not issued as nonconformities. He did give some suggestions during the audit but only verbally.

Firstly, do other people have the same experience?

Secondly, be aware that this might be the case for your notified body as well and make notes of any suggestions from the auditor, they might not turn up in the audit report!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#2
Re: Notified body not issuing 'Improvement Potentials' anymore

I usually call those "NCs threats", cause the whole idea was, "this is a possible NC which, if you do not act upon, will turn on a NC on our next visit". Usually those have nothing to do with improvement.

Totally weird.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#3
Re: Notified body not issuing 'Improvement Potentials' anymore

Firstly, do other people have the same experience?
A very large percentage of auditors working for certification and notified bodies have indeed stopped recording findings classified as opportunities for improvement (OFI) in their audit reports. And the primary reason for that is the fact that many of the so called observations, comments and OFI's, when scrutinized by an independent reviewer, would indicate that a requirement was being violated and the auditor had found evidence to that effect, which, by definition is a nonconformity.

The practice of softgrading exists in the management system conformity assessment world and, most interested parties have been fighting against it. Accreditation body auditors tend to scrutinize CB audit reports, looking for instances of softgrading.

Because of that, many auditors have stopped the reporting of any type of findings, other than nonconformities and noteworthy efforts.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#5
Re: Notified body not issuing 'Improvement Potentials' anymore

The FDA and Health Canada are involved in a pilot program that, among other things, discourages OFI's in audit reports. See 2.3.3 of the attached for info.
It is true it discourages OFI's, but it encourages observations and other relevant findings:
However, as an important component of a complete and accurate record of the audit, observations and findings should be reported. Observations can include situations which appear to be non-conforming but where insufficient audit evidence was collected.
 

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#6
Re: Notified body not issuing 'Improvement Potentials' anymore

The problem here is the word "improvement".

If something is a possible NC but the auditor has insufficient evidence, anything that the manufcturer do about it is preventive action, not improvement.
 
Last edited:

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#7
Re: Notified body not issuing 'Improvement Potentials' anymore

ISO 17021:2011 reads:
9.1.9.6.2 Opportunities for improvement may be identified and recorded, unless prohibited by the requirements of a management system certification scheme. Audit findings, however, which are nonconformities in accordance with 9.1.15 b) and c) shall not be recorded as opportunities for improvement.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#9
Re: Notified body not issuing 'Improvement Potentials' anymore

The problem here is the word "improvement".

If something is a possible NC but the auditor has insufficient evidence, anything that the manufcturer do about it is preventive action, not improvement.
Isn't it just semantics? Why wouldn't a preventive action be considered "improvement"? And vice versa - almost any "pure" improvement can be presented as some sort of preventive action. Can't it?
 

Peter Selvey

Staff member
Super Moderator
#10
As an auditor, I think one of the key problems is that you are always aware of the implications of an NC, and in particular the time frame for real corrective action. If this is beyond the limits allowed by the certification body (typically 3 months), and auditor would be reluctant to raise an issue as a formal NC. Thus, an "Improvement potential" was a way to flag issues without formally raising an NC.

Of course, the problem is that if it is a real NC, then the issue should be formally raised, regardless of the implications.

I believe that this problem was addressed by allowing the manufacturer to reply to an NC with an action plan rather than real correction action, but this probably depends on the certification body's rules, and also the scheme or regulation.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Ed Panek Notified Body Substantial Change MDD EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Spain Notified Body Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Notified Body Spain Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
M Spanish Notified Body - Spanish language CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
K MDR Class 1 Self Certification - Competent Authority or Notified Body? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
P Notified Body Approval of Change EU Medical Device Regulations 2
K Adding the Notified Body Number CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
A NB (Notified Body) Audit of Standards ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
J Conflict of Interest Registrar/Notified Body/Testing House Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
R Change Notification - Registrar vs Notified body ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
Watchcat "Disappeared" Linkedin Notified Body Rant EU Medical Device Regulations 2
M Notified Body audits -Class Ia medical device product EU Medical Device Regulations 4
R Notified Body for MDD 1Q20 - Florida Company Registrars and Notified Bodies 4
M Informational EU – New notified body designated under the MDR – NB 2797 BSI Group The Netherlands B.V. Netherlands Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational EU – New notified body designated under the MDR – NB 1912 – DARE!! Services B.V. – Netherlands Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
N Customer asking if their notified body can audit us ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
N MDR review process by notified body - How many steps exist in the review process EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Ed Panek CAPA against Notified Body? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
M Informational EU – First IVDR designated Notified Body – DEKRA Certification GmbH Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
N Regular meetings with Notified Body EU Medical Device Regulations 13
M Informational EU – New designated Notified Body under the MDR – TÜV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational New designated Notified Body for Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) included in Nando – IMQ ISTITUTO ITALIANO DEL MARCHIO DI QUALITÀ S.P.A. Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
M Informational EU – Next Notified Body designated to the MDR 2017/475 is IMQ S.p.A from Italy Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational EU – DEKRA Certification GmbH is the third Notified Body designated under the MDR Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
JoshuaFroud The withdrawal of Lloyd’s Register MDD & IVDD Notified Body Status CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
M Measurement Unit Rounding Nonconformity - Notified Body Audit Registrars and Notified Bodies 6
M Informational From RAPS – Another Notified Body Bows Out Ahead of EU MDR: ‘Investment Too High’ Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Authorized Rep (AR), competent authority, NCA and notified body - Differences EU Medical Device Regulations 9
R How long to wait for Notified Body Response - Potentially significant change to a medical device CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 6
M Informational New Notified Body designated under the MDR – TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH Zertifizierstellen Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
shimonv Non-significant notice of change to notified body EU Medical Device Regulations 4
S Difficulty Finding A Notified Body for CE Marking - No Capacity Registrars and Notified Bodies 5
P Notified body located in an other country than manufacturing company ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M BSI – Want to know more about the Notified Body? Registrars and Notified Bodies 0
M Start-Up Company looking for ISO 13485 Certification Body and Medical Device CE Mark Notified Body Registrars and Notified Bodies 6
M Medical Device News BSI achieves Designation for its Netherlands Medical Devices Notified Body EU Medical Device Regulations 2
C Attestation of QA certificate from foreign (EU) Notified Body Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 6
D Notified body - CE Certification Class 2a Products in India CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
M Notified Body Involvement with Self Declared Products EU Medical Device Regulations 7
C QR Code on Medical Device Packaging and Notification to Notified Body EU Medical Device Regulations 1
H Clinical investigation - Role of Notified Body (NB) EU Medical Device Regulations 6
S Certification Body, Registrar, Notified Body - What is the difference? Registrars and Notified Bodies 3
D CE Mark with same NB (Notified Body)? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
Sam Lazzara Expedited, fast-track Notified Body Technical File reviews EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Sam Lazzara Notified Body CE Project Manager - Worst job ever? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
K Notified Body - Minor Nonconformances - They have withheld all certificates General Auditing Discussions 3
R Non-Conformity Report from Notified Body - MEDDEV Guide is not Legally Binding EU Medical Device Regulations 16
JoCam Required Frequency of Notified Body reviews of Technical Files EU Medical Device Regulations 6
R ISO 13485 Certificate Scope modified by Notified Body EU Medical Device Regulations 9
S Literature Search - Notified Body Had Questions About our Rationale CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 9

Similar threads

Top Bottom