Officially finished?

R

Roger Eastin

#1
#1
I have not heard this, but I am not surprised. I guess you haven't had your head in the sand too long, have you? One more nail in the coffin...
 
Standard Work Instruction Software by Dozuki
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
D

Dan De Yarman

#3
#3
I had heard that the QS Task Force has been disbanned. So for all intensive purposes QS is dead, right? Has anyone else heard or read anything about this?

I have had my head buried in the sand because I was preparing for our registration audit; so if this has been discussed elsewhere please point me in that direction.

Thank you,

Dan
 
D

Dan De Yarman

#4
#4
I heard it from my Lead Auditor during our Registration Audit, of all times. I am not sure if Perry Johnson has privledged information or just my auditor, but he said it with perfect certainty. I would imagine the AIAG won't say anything until it is absolutely necessary, so verifying this may be difficult.

I have a call in to my auditor about a finding from the Rgisration Audit, I'll ask him where he heard it from.
 
I

isodude

#5
#5
Dude,

The disbanding of the QS task force does not suprise me. It lines up with all of the facts regarding the demise of QS 9000 and the onset of ISO/TS 16949. Dont forget to ask your auditor if the big three are still actively driving the IAOB effort. I'm sure the answer will be yes.

I did some snooping and got the direct line phone number of Steve Walsh who is Fords AIAG dude.I left a voice message regarding this topic and of course, he didn't return the call. Maybe someone else will have better luck.

(313) 594-0417 Allen Park ,Mich.

[This message has been edited by isodude (edited 04 August 2000).]
 
S

Steven Truchon

#6
#6
Surveillance audit #5 today.
I asked our Registrar about this.
He just finished his re-certification and the subject came up. His input to me was:

TS16949 is acceptable in place of QS9000 currently. "IF" TS is to replace QS it would become public information around the time that 9000:2000 takes effect. The only thing that is official at this time is that the "officials" are tight-lipped on this.
He went on to say that there has been no dismantling or disbanding in the QS governing community or AIAG.

This is, of course, for whats it worth...
 
S

Steven Truchon

#7
#7
I visited the Excel Partnership and AIAG websites and both clearly state that TS16949 is NOT a replacement for QS9000. It is also clearly stated that TS16949 is the statndard that will permit a company to satisfy all nations current individual automotive quality standards. I read accounts that B3 acknowledges and accepts 16949 but not one word about abandoning QS9000.

So, my question is: What evidence has been presented that gives the demise of QS9000 any substance? I am getting the impression that there is a lot of hearsay from many who are speculating, but from the sources that seem closest to the issue are saying otherwise.

---Confused (but thats nothing new LOL)
 
Marc

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#8
#8
Originally posted by Steven Truchon:

I visited the Excel Partnership and AIAG websites and both clearly state that TS16949 is NOT a replacement for QS9000.
----------------snip--------
So, my question is: What evidence has been presented that gives the demise of QS9000 any substance? I am getting the impression that there is a lot of hearsay from many who are speculating, but from the sources that seem closest to the issue are saying otherwise.
Click to expand...
I don't think they're saying otherwise. They're simply saying as of this date QS-9000 is still acceptable.

OK - I'm guessing. I bet QS-9000 will not be revised in the future. After thousands of companies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars over the past 6 years, it's not going away tomorrow. But in 3 or 4 years no one will be registering to it. No reason for it. If the AIAG announced QS-9000's demise today quite a few suppliers would ne somewhat unhappy.
 
S

Steven Truchon

#9
#9
Thanks Marc.

I just got this email reply from a person at AIAG, for what its worth.

Dear Steve:

There has been no change in the status of QS-9000 or ISO/TS 16949. QS-9000 is still mandatory and ISO/TS 16949 is optional. As far the the Task Force, it has not been disbanded.
Thank you,
Stacy
 
Marc

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#10
#10
They probably MEANT to say "...either QS-9000 or ISO/TS 16949 is mandatory (one or the other)..." For example, GM requires *either* QS or 16949.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
F FDA officially recognizes HE75 Human Factors Standard IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 8
Y QS9000 officially obsolete and replace by TS 16949? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 3
O Clarifying FDA definition of "finished device" and “capable of functioning” 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
L PMA and Non-PMA parts in same finished goods area? Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 1
M Contract Manufacturer of a Finished Medical Device ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
E Brazil - RDC 183 - Finished device - Definition Question Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
V GRR Study on a Finished Product - Batch Manufacturing Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
R 510(k) - Finished Test Reports - RTA - Bit of a Complaint 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
V AQL for Component Level and Assembled Finished Product AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 1
alonFAI Finished PCB Final Visual Inspection Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
C Off-The-Shelf requirements (Finished Medical Devices) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
J Tracking and Traceability of Finished Goods ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Does Contract Manufacturer need to issue Food Grade certificate for finished device? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
J Discrepancy in Manual Counting - Finished Goods Boxes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
JanWarner Importing a Finished Medical Device from China (tooth whitener w/ peroxide) China Medical Device Regulations 2
M Definition Receiving Inspection of Parts, finished products, service parts etc. Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 6
S Three Questions on Finished Medical Device Traceability, Labeling and Packaging US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
shimonv Storage of finished medical devices per 21 CFR Part 820.150 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 9
T SOP for How to Write a Specification for Raw Materials and Finished Good ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A Outsourced Processes Control (Finished Medical Device Delivery, Storage) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
V What is the difference in cGMPs for API vs Finished Dosage forms ? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
M Supplier PPAP for Interim Materials - Oil to test functionality of finished product IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
P Surface Finish measurement for machined (finished) component/part Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
C When to submit a 510(k)? After the DMR (Device Master Record) is finished? Other US Medical Device Regulations 4
R Outsourcing of a Semi-Finished Product - Which major things to address in the QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
6 Catering HACCP/Food Safety - Traceability from Receipt to Finished Product Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 1
V Device Retains - How many people keep retains of finished devices and why? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
L Assessing Corrosion Damages on Steel finished externally with Epoxical Paint Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 1
M Definition Brief Period of Time relative to Temperature Excursions for Finished Products Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
B NAFTA Requirements - Finished Product or Materials/Parts from Suppliers, too? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 2
W Stent Coverings and Stents - Finished Medical Device or not? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 3
K Raw Materials from 3rd World Countries vs. Finished Products from 1st World Countries Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 23
C D&D (Design and Development) Requirement for Semi-Finished Products Design and Development of Products and Processes 4
V Creating a Cosmetic Inspection Specification for Powder Coated Painted Finished Parts Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
F Trend Analysis of Kanban System for our Finished Goods Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
J Routine test for MD finished product IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
N Inspection requirements - responsibility (sht. metal, sub assembled & finished parts) Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5
P This Is It - Tomorrow is the final decision - Finished the certification audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Q Focused CAPA on Missing Finished Nonconforming Product ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
G Control charts of finished product characteristics..NonSense? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
C Packaging of Finished Electronic Goods - Desiccants necessary? Manufacturing and Related Processes 9
pammesue New Part Traceability - Lot number and finished product traceability ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
V Surveillance Audit - Recently we finished our surveillance audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
D Formula for Determining Finished Good Roll Diameter Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
J ISO 9001:2000 Implementation Project: finished procedures ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 52
Stijloor Guideline to Standardize the Transp. Damage Claim Process for Finished Veh. IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
Scott Catron 21 CFR parts 210 and 211 - CURRENT GMP FOR FINISHED PHARMACEUTICALS Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
gunnyshore Auditing External Suppliers of Finished Devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
A Monitoring and Measurement of Finished Goods with a Better Method IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
L Preventing Set Up Parts from getting in with Finished Goods Manufacturing and Related Processes 17

Similar threads

Top Bottom