Opening Design Limits to Accomodate Process Capability

L

lee01

#1
#1
I have several parts that do not fall within the stated design specifications and will never fall within these specifications due to machine capability not being adequate.

Basically the machines we currently use are considered the best money can buy, the previous manufactured part/s are ‘fit-for-purpose’ (God I hate that statement) and are on the final assembly.

What we would like to do is to assign concessioned tolerances to the ‘fit-for-purpose’ parts for future orders. We have a great deal of manipulation with regards to design changes and have full authority in this situation.

The question is, how do we apply a new tolerance inline with machine capability? The current idea is to open the tolerances using +/- 4 standard deviations, now personally I’m not too convinced about taking this route and would like your feedback and proposed routes of applying a new tolerance.

We understand the machines process capability and have measured this capability over the past year or so.

Your help in this situation is somewhat needed!

Lee01:bonk:
 
Paper to QMS ad
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

JRKH

#2
#2
Lee,

Since you already know that the design tolerance is tighter than is required for the use, my first question would be what tolerance is REALLY needed for the function? Use this tolerance regardless of your process capability.

If the tolerance needed is +/- 4 sigma then by all means set it there and watch your process closely. However if the needed tolerance is greater than +/-4 sigma you have a little more wiggle room in your process without producing bad parts.

James
 
L

lee01

#3
#3
Thanks for the reply JRKH.

I understand your view with regards to the actual tolerance required, but this tolerance has been instigated to facilitate a full interchangeable product where each panel should be able to be removed and replaced with another at any given day anywhere in the world.

Although this panel has been manufactured outside these stated limits, it has been proven to be acceptable in this instance. We will continue to ‘strive’ to manufacture the product to the stated specification limits but will have limits that have been proven ‘fit-for-purpose’ that will be used as an ongoing concession.

The production staff would like these limits to be calculated simply by manufacturing the part as bad as possible but ensuring the part fits the assembly, and using those extreme limits as the concession limits. Personally I would like to use some other method, preferable statistical, to establish these limits based upon the actual performance of the machine and/ or process capability.

Any suggestions?

I don’t want much?

Lee01
 
Atul Khandekar

Atul Khandekar

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
#4
James is right in asking what tolerance is REALLY needed for the function? It looks like your designers have to do detailed Tolerance Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis.
- Atul.
 
S

Sam

#5
#5
Shades of Motorola, this is one of the typical problems that launched the six sigma process. Design to manufacture. Use the tools in the order in which they are intended and you will get amazing results. ( Note, and you do not have to be a black belt)
 
Geoff Cotton

Geoff Cotton

Quite Involved in Discussions
#6
#6
Lee,

If you know at what point the product fails to be functional and you have 12 months of data you should be able to determine if there is correlation between size and functionallity.

If you take the data and plot it, calculate the regression and 95% confidence bands etc. you will be able to calculate your 'realistic tolerance'. (If you have got Minitab this is very easy)

Once you've got that recalculate your process capability based on the new spec.

When I do this at our plant the product/process designers go really quiet for some reason.:rolleyes:

Hope this helps
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Quality checklist for opening a second location Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
Marc Problem Opening Attachments Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 4
M Apply for a job when no opening is posted? Career and Occupation Discussions 64
R Opening pressure of one-way valve in anaesthetic workstation IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
shimonv Re-Sterilizing a Device which requires Re-Opening and Repair EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Marc Opening certain Boeing Supplier Documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S Template of Opening Meeting for Internal Audits Internal Auditing 7
Q Tips on how to conduct a good Internal Audit Opening Meeting Internal Auditing 19
N Symbol for Medical Device Sterile Packaging - "Inspect Seal Before Opening" Other Medical Device Related Standards 5
L What typical items do auditors bring to Opening Meetings Internal Auditing 4
Jim Wynne Baseball Opening Day--A Sure Sign Of Spring Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 3
S Opening Up Tolerances - We have over 6000 live drawings - help please Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
S Auditing the Top Management during the Opening Meeting of Internal Audit Internal Auditing 21
BradM 29th Olympics in China - Beyond the opening Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 82
Ajit Basrur China kicks off 29th Olympics Opening Ceremony Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 38
P Should the audit objectives be discussed in the opening meeting? General Auditing Discussions 15
W Opening Small Shop in Mexico - Does ISO Still Apply? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
J Quality Department Job Opening - High Point, North Carolina Career and Occupation Discussions 0
Q Quality Job Opening at Toyota Career and Occupation Discussions 1
A Does anyone conduct opening & closing meetings for their internal audits? Internal Auditing 19
C Opening a new Calibration Laboratory - Need help General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
R DFA & DFM - Examples for Design for assembly and design for manufacturability Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 1
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D ISO 13485 - 7.3.6 Design and development verification - Do most folks create a separate SOP? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
K Joint approval between OEM and Manufacturer on Design Documents ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
M API 4F/7K/8C Design Package Validation Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
A Design History File - Not ready to share the design drawings or Bill of Material US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
W Need for current design or process control FMEA and Control Plans 2
A What is the difference between Design Process, Process Design and Design Control? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
D Test summary report example for design validation wanted - ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
S Documenting Design Verification Test Results (ISO 9001) Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
DuncanGibbons Understanding the applicability of Design of Experiments to the IQ OQ PQ qualification approach Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0
S Requirement to Conduct New Shelf-life Testing? (re-do testing for design change) EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A Sample Agreement available for Outsourcing Medical Device Design activity? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
DuncanGibbons How is the arrangement between Design and Production organisation envisaged? EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 4
L Design & Development of a SERVICE Service Industry Specific Topics 13
C Documentation for items used for Design Verification 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
P Design verification driven by new equipment. How is this different than process validation? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
A AS9102B - 3.6 Design Characteristics and form 3 AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
P Design FMEA - Detection Rating criteria ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
U Medical Device Design finalization testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S MDR Delay - MDD design Change? (before new MDR DOA) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
J Iterative design and production for custom made products ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
T Design Input detail & specificity ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
J Design file for pre-existing products - Inputs and Outputs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D Design Transfer Template capturing Customer Specific Requirements Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
T Design Control Procedures later in the Development Process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
M Looking for a Presentation on Design for Excellence (DfX) Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K Old medical devices -> 7.3.7. Design and development validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom