Opening Design Limits to Accomodate Process Capability

L

lee01

#1
I have several parts that do not fall within the stated design specifications and will never fall within these specifications due to machine capability not being adequate.

Basically the machines we currently use are considered the best money can buy, the previous manufactured part/s are ‘fit-for-purpose’ (God I hate that statement) and are on the final assembly.

What we would like to do is to assign concessioned tolerances to the ‘fit-for-purpose’ parts for future orders. We have a great deal of manipulation with regards to design changes and have full authority in this situation.

The question is, how do we apply a new tolerance inline with machine capability? The current idea is to open the tolerances using +/- 4 standard deviations, now personally I’m not too convinced about taking this route and would like your feedback and proposed routes of applying a new tolerance.

We understand the machines process capability and have measured this capability over the past year or so.

Your help in this situation is somewhat needed!

Lee01:bonk:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J
#2
Lee,

Since you already know that the design tolerance is tighter than is required for the use, my first question would be what tolerance is REALLY needed for the function? Use this tolerance regardless of your process capability.

If the tolerance needed is +/- 4 sigma then by all means set it there and watch your process closely. However if the needed tolerance is greater than +/-4 sigma you have a little more wiggle room in your process without producing bad parts.

James
 
L

lee01

#3
Thanks for the reply JRKH.

I understand your view with regards to the actual tolerance required, but this tolerance has been instigated to facilitate a full interchangeable product where each panel should be able to be removed and replaced with another at any given day anywhere in the world.

Although this panel has been manufactured outside these stated limits, it has been proven to be acceptable in this instance. We will continue to ‘strive’ to manufacture the product to the stated specification limits but will have limits that have been proven ‘fit-for-purpose’ that will be used as an ongoing concession.

The production staff would like these limits to be calculated simply by manufacturing the part as bad as possible but ensuring the part fits the assembly, and using those extreme limits as the concession limits. Personally I would like to use some other method, preferable statistical, to establish these limits based upon the actual performance of the machine and/ or process capability.

Any suggestions?

I don’t want much?

Lee01
 
A

Atul Khandekar

#4
James is right in asking what tolerance is REALLY needed for the function? It looks like your designers have to do detailed Tolerance Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis.
- Atul.
 
#5
Shades of Motorola, this is one of the typical problems that launched the six sigma process. Design to manufacture. Use the tools in the order in which they are intended and you will get amazing results. ( Note, and you do not have to be a black belt)
 

Geoff Cotton

Quite Involved in Discussions
#6
Lee,

If you know at what point the product fails to be functional and you have 12 months of data you should be able to determine if there is correlation between size and functionallity.

If you take the data and plot it, calculate the regression and 95% confidence bands etc. you will be able to calculate your 'realistic tolerance'. (If you have got Minitab this is very easy)

Once you've got that recalculate your process capability based on the new spec.

When I do this at our plant the product/process designers go really quiet for some reason.:rolleyes:

Hope this helps
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Sidney Vianna Job Opening in the USA - IATF 16949 Lead Auditor Position Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
L Top opening of enclsoure against fire in IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
E Responsibilities opening new markets outside EU Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Quality checklist for opening a second location Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
Marc Problem Opening Attachments Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 4
M Apply for a job when no opening is posted? Career and Occupation Discussions 64
R Opening pressure of one-way valve in anaesthetic workstation IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
shimonv Re-Sterilizing a Device which requires Re-Opening and Repair EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Marc Opening certain Boeing Supplier Documents Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S Template of Opening Meeting for Internal Audits Internal Auditing 7
Q Tips on how to conduct a good Internal Audit Opening Meeting Internal Auditing 19
N Symbol for Medical Device Sterile Packaging - "Inspect Seal Before Opening" Other Medical Device Related Standards 5
L What typical items do auditors bring to Opening Meetings Internal Auditing 4
Jim Wynne Baseball Opening Day--A Sure Sign Of Spring Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 3
S Opening Up Tolerances - We have over 6000 live drawings - help please Design and Development of Products and Processes 6
S Auditing the Top Management during the Opening Meeting of Internal Audit Internal Auditing 21
BradM 29th Olympics in China - Beyond the opening Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 82
Ajit Basrur China kicks off 29th Olympics Opening Ceremony Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 38
P Should the audit objectives be discussed in the opening meeting? General Auditing Discussions 15
W Opening Small Shop in Mexico - Does ISO Still Apply? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
J Quality Department Job Opening - High Point, North Carolina Career and Occupation Discussions 0
Q Quality Job Opening at Toyota Career and Occupation Discussions 1
A Does anyone conduct opening & closing meetings for their internal audits? Internal Auditing 19
C Opening a new Calibration Laboratory - Need help General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
L Essential Design Outputs for SAMD 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
T Justification of "Design Excluded" in IATF 16949 Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
H Contract Manufacturer as Design Owner ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
B Drawings - Design Rules Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 26
R Role of QA during Design and Development of Products and Processes Design and Development of Products and Processes 4
B Design Responsibilities for Mature Acquired Product Lines ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
I RWE Studies and Design Controls US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
G How to record Regulations and Standards as Design Inputs? Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
T Design Traceability - Labelling / Instructions for Use ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
B How to exclude empty rows in full factorial design analysis? Using Minitab Software 0
M Handling design changes with use-as-is inventory disposition Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
M Design Control - Management of Electronic CAD files Design and Development of Products and Processes 14
S Examples of FDA acceptable Software Design Specification (SDS) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
A Design Change/ECO Related Question 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
R Using R package to implement Bayesian phase I/II dose-finding design for three outcomes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
C ISO 9001:2015 8.3.2. h) Design and Development Planning - What is required? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Z Software for design control ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
E Design and Development file Procedure ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
DuncanGibbons Section 8.3 relevant for design organisations AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
P DFMEA - Machinery Design Best Practices FMEA and Control Plans 0
R Is a FAIR required on parts that we design? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
U API Spec Q1 - 5.6.1.2 C (3) - Design software Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 3
N Example for design and development planning,input,output,review,verification,validation and transfer Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
A 8.6 Release of products and services, 8.3 Design and development - evidence required ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
C Stress / Challenge Conditions for Design Verification Testing to Reduce Sample Size 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 11
J Significant change related to design and intended use EU Medical Device Regulations 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom