Operational Risk - Quality system procedure should cover all eventualities

A

Alan Cotterell

#1
Dear Andy, I feel I should persevere and explain the concept of operational risk management a little bit further.
As I have said before the major risk areas in any industrial process are - quality, safety, environment, security.
If you consider the situation which exists in a hospital casualty ward, where a nurse is receiving patients - she should provide a quality service to patients. In the situation where some drunk cuts loose in the ward and attacks her or patients, you have a loss of quality of service, you have a health and safety problem, you might have environmental problems (if enough blood is spilt), you certainly have a security problem.
The risks are related and there are tradeoffs between them, which are affected by the risk controls you introduce.
Any quality system procedure should cover all eventualities.

Consider the situation where a nuclear reactor is in operation. Procedures might be aimed at maintaining electricity supply, but shouldn't they also cover workplace safety (safe handling of isotopes), environment (control of isotopes so that they are not released), security (protection of isotpes from terrorists).

In most cases a policy statement reflected in procedures is sufficient to control these risks.
I suggest management manuals should have four policy areas but only procedures which define the process in the workplace, and not separate quality, safety, environmental protection and security procedures.
It's a matter of doing the job right first time, i.e. getting an output which satisfies the customer - a quality/safe/nonpolluting product produced in a safe, nonpolluting secure workplace.

In the nuclear reactor case I am a stakeholder. There has been a proposal to set up a reactor in Indonesia in the next ten years. The culture in that country is not very democratic, and I suggest that this gives a certainty of incidents occurring. The controls for quality, safety, environment and security in reactors are procedural and depend on people doing the right thing, it's just not going to happen in Indonesia, we'll get another Chenobyl.
So Darwin will not be a good place to live.

I don't really care whether you have a problem selling quality systems to organisations, the point is their operational risk must be appropriately managed, and it's a matter of controlling the risks to a level tolerable to all stakeholders.

Best Regards, Al
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
A
#2
Al:

I found your risk management interesting.

I notice when reading the various forums that individuals place quality, environmental, health and safety, and security in their compartments with ISO/QS in their compartment, as though they are not related.

As far as I am concerned they should all be included when documenting, and implementing ISO/QS.

These are all processes, which I include in Process Control, and I have trouble understanding how everybody wants to separate them.

As part of my Gap Analysis, environmental, health and safety issues, which ties in with security, play an important role. ISO/QS states a company must be in control of their regulatory and statutory requirements. Therefore, as an example, when a company is building an addition, they better have the appropriate building permit as mandated by law.

When a company chooses to ignore, and does not comply with mandated regulations, and laws they then sign a waiver for me. However most companies show a willingness to cooperate, and end up with a fabulous system.
Should they choose not to sign the waiver,that's their choice, however it is my choice not to be their consultant.

Lastly all documentation, including laws, codes, etc. are listed on the Controlled Document & Data List, or master equivalent, as external documents. I don't see how any of this can be separated.

my monies worth, which isn't worth a whole lot nowadays in Canada,

awk
 
A

Alan Cotterell

#3
I've given this matter of 'compartmentalisation of thought' some consideration over the years and have come up with some reasons for it.
If you have a look at the drawings of Escher the German artist, you will see monks walking continuously upstairs, and water flowing continuously downhill around in circles, in a way which is effectively perpetual motion, which we know is impossible.
In effect we cannot look at two parts of the picture at the same time, and see the absurdity of the drawings.
I suggest similarly we cannot perceive the ramifications of the quality, safety, environment, and security systems simultaneously - we cannot see the 'big picture'.
The answer is to write policies for the four risk areas, but only procedures for actually doing the process in the workplace.
The procedure is the point of systems integration, it should reflect all policies of the organisation. It is the 'correct way of performing work', in the organisation.
 
A

Alan Cotterell

#6
Operational Risk

Dear Andy and Marc, From your silence and the fact that you removed the previous postings and responses on this subject from your forum, I note that you now understand Operational Risk Management. I can only suggest the action you have taken to apply this level of censorship, implies the parochial nature of your thinking, and the way you wish to continue.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#7
Allan, don't give me (us) your bull. Andy had nothing to do with your message 'disappearing'. Your post was moved -- by me -- to the Misc Quality Topics forum as it more appropriately belongs there. You're just so focused upon yourself and your own ramblings (read: your own importance) that the forums here as a whole don't interest you - or you would have seen that the thread had been moved.

Just about every post you make here is on risk and promotes your web site. Nothing new. Many times I read your 'manifestos' and think to my self things like: "Should I delete this as a commercial posting?" and "Does this guy know anything else?" Often it's almost like SPAM - a diatribe about your 'cause' and then a "...by the way, you can learn more at my web site..." In truth, we both know you have been laughed out of several forums at other sites.

As far as your saying "...I can only suggest the action you have taken to apply this level of censorship, implies the parochial nature of your thinking...", I suggest you look in a mirror. And I suggest that you get a life.

As far as censorship goes, you should know better (but I'm not surprised you don't). If you don't 'like it here' in the Cove forums, then don't come back. No one is forcing you to visit or to post.
 
A

Alan Cotterell

#8
Dear Marc,
I should have guessed you had moved the postings on Operational Risk. I apologise that you have been 'wrongfully accused', and for the fact that I have been too lazy to determine the logic associated with your forum structure.
As you have said, my postings in the past have always said the same sorts of things. Until recently I have never received a response which gave recognition of any sense to my comments.
The posting by awk from Canada in your forum is the first indication that anyone else actually percieves there is a problem coordinating the four risk areas. His solution - getting a waiver from the customer, is not what I would normally do, but it's a good answer.
The health and safety law in Victoria,Australia has recently changed to a risk management basis to replace (complement?) the Roben's style legislation.
I have developed a management manual which will give compliance with the new laws, is compatible with ISO9000, ISO14000. It is fairly generic for engineering companies conducting their business on a project basis. It has taken me about twenty years of writing manuals to get to the stage where I have one which really works.
The posting from awk has given me the reassurance I need to proceed to sell it.
I greatly appreciate the use of your forum, sorry to be a nuisance.
 
A

Andy Bassett

#9
Hello Alan

Four days per week i live in an area where i consider myself lucky to have running water, but definitely no Internet access, the rest of the week i have to 'snatch' at Internet access in the companies where i work, which maybe explains the ragged quality of my input/questions sometime.

However, out of curiosity i have been E mailing you directly (inlcuding one this morning) as i wanted to explore your ideas a little more thoroughly, in case i was mssing something or i could learn something. You sound a little miffed, but I hadnt meant to slight you in anyway.

Regards

------------------
Andy B
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
C AS9100 Rev D 8.1.1 & APQP - Operational risk management process AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 0
R AS9100D Cl. 8.4.2 - Identify Raw Material as a Significant Operational Risk AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 4
S What does "Operational Review" mean as tool - Effectiveness of Internal Control Risk Management Review Meetings and related Processes 3
A Operational Risk Management - In Memory of Alan Cotterell - A Focused Individual ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
M Operational (free) simulation games for manufacturing and quality Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 5
Richard Regalado Top 10 operational risks of 2019 for business continuity planning Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 6
I ISO 22000:2018 - Operational Prerequisite Program Examples Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 2
D Determining of sample size for 'Operational Qualification' AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 3
Z Operational Qualification for Injection Molding Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 6
L OpEx (Operational Excellence) Documents in QMS? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
O Air Flow - Which is the operational difference between LAF (vertical and horizontal) and RLAF? Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
M Informational UK – Brexit operational readiness guidance for the health and care system in England Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
T Operational setup of how FIFO / Process Map on Lithium Batteries is done Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
C AS9100D, Clause 8.1 - Operational Planning and Control AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 12
J Installation Qualification (IQ) and Operational Qualification (OQ) for Laser Marking 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
Q Management control Procedures & Operational Control Procedures ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
L Heated Sealed Packages - Sample Size for OQ (Operational Qualification) and PQ Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 11
A Quality Department - Operational Framework Service Industry Specific Topics 2
A Operational Procedure for an IT Service Industry Quality Department Service Industry Specific Topics 1
M Integrated Phased Processes - AS9100D cl. 8.1 Operational Planning - Clarification AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 8
A IT Managed Services Company Quality Department - Operational Document ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
G How have you addressed Cl 4.4.6 Operational Control ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 4
E Operational Qualification of a Drug Box Coding Device in Production Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
J OQ (Operational Qualification) for Liquid-Water Isotope Analyser Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 2
B Usage of Parts from OQ (Operational Qualification) Mold Validation ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
B OQ (Operational Qualification) of a Freeze Dryer Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
I Quality and Operational Excellence Training Institutes in Europe Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
W ISO 14644 Cleanroom Validation - "Operational" Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
M Quality Manual - ISO 17025 required Mandatory and Operational Procedures ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
S Barcode Scanner IOPQ (Installation/Operational/Performance Qualification) Requirement Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 9
J OHSAS 18001 Clause 4.4.6 Operational Control Example Procedure Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 9
M Determining Sample Size needed for Operational Qualification (OQ) Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 24
G Evaluation of Training for Operational Staff Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 8
K Operational Prerequisite Programmes (oPRP) Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 2
L OQ (Operational Qualification) for Electropolish - Orthopedic Cutting Tools Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
W Packaging / Heat Sealer Validation - IOQ (Installation/Operational Qualification) Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 13
A ISO 14001:2004 Clause 4.4.6 - Operational control (in English) ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
D Good operational definition for Schedule Variance Software Quality Assurance 2
A Sample Documented Procedures that satisfy 4.4.6 Operational Control wanted ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
Q Operational Qualification of a CNC machine ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
D Laser Weld Operational Qualification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Operational Qualification for injection molding process Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
D Procedures in Communication, Operational Control, etc. - ISO 14001 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 12
C CNC Machine Operational Qualification Recoverability Testing Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 1
V Identification of Operational Prerequisite Programs (oPRP) for ready to eat products Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 4
P Operational QMS (Dubai) vs. compliant QMS (UK) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
W IQ, OQ, PQ (installation, operational & performance qualification) compared to PPAP ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
H Basic questions about Installation, Operational & Performance Qualification - PCBA Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 11
S Operational Excellence Assessment of multiple sites - Seeking examples Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 6
T DFT - Demand Flow Technology - Operational Sheets (WI) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom