Opinion instead of fact - Auditor opinion with no requirement in the standard

Does your auditor accurately report non compliance?


  • Total voters
    16

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
#1
No details at this time (but I may add later!) but I am currently spending a lot of time dealing with audit findings written up on the basis of auditor opinion with no requirement in the relevant standard.

Having spent (too) many years in this business I had hoped to see an improvement in audit standards over the years with auditors identifying the audit criteria accurately (the "shall") and quoting the objective evidence of what they have seen and how it fails to comply with the criteria.

My question is this: For audit non complainces (that you are required to take action on) are the findings based on fact and referenced back to the standard element that identifies what you are required to do?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

ScottK

Not out of the crisis
Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
well - a requirement might not necessarily come from the standard.

It might be a requirement of your own documentation that you are not following. But even then the auditor should point out what document and what section of that document you are not complying with.

I've found all the auditors I've dealt with were pretty fair as far as ISO9000, FDA, OSHA, and EU PED. So I voted "accurate".
 
J
#4
In our case we not had much problem with this. The forms used by our auditor have a section for the clause and if this isn't filled in I will question it. The 2 or 3 times it has happened I was able to resolve it with the auditor without any problem. Usually, if he cannot pin it to a specific Shall, he'll downgrade it to an observation and we can respond/or not as we see fit.

James
 
R

ralphsulser

#5
I have 2 answers for this question:
1-ISO/TS16949 3rd party registrar auditors-yes, they issued NCs based on objective evidence and clause involved.
2-Customer 2nd party auditors-findings and severity based on opinion, and desire to make a return trip to the sunny south. (so they can go to Myrtle Beach not far from here, at their company's expense.)
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#6
In the end all we are actually doing is supplying our opinion supported by evidence.

"The system has been effectively established and meets requirements" is nothing more than than another way of saying "In my opinion they are doing what they are supposed to be doing and here is the evidence I have identified to support my decision"
 
T

tyker

#7
I have 2 answers for this question:
1-ISO/TS16949 3rd party registrar auditors-yes, they issued NCs based on objective evidence and clause involved.
2-Customer 2nd party auditors-findings and severity based on opinion, and desire to make a return trip to the sunny south. (so they can go to Myrtle Beach not far from here, at their company's expense.)
My opinion exactly (although this being Milton Keynes substitute the banks of the Grand Union canal for Myrtle Beach).

I noticed a significant change in the wording of TS 16949 non-conformities after the auditor went through his last requalification. They are now much more precisely tied to the process and specific TS requirement.

We've yet to have a value adding customer audit. They don't raise much, if anything, in the way of non-conformities, the auditors just want to get their report completed as quickly as possible and get out. We provide a really miserable lunch so they don't come back too often.
 

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
#8
In the end all we are actually doing is supplying our opinion supported by evidence.
You said it all here, Randy. We look at the objective evidence - and raise findings if the facts indicate that a requirement is not being met. At the end of the audit we assess the findings and come up with a balanced recommendation (or opinion if you like) on the organization's readiness for certification.

The reason for the poll - and I am pleasantly surprised at the way it is develoing - is that if the findings aren't based on this evidence then the recommendation is based totally on the auditor's opinion and certification becomes a "like / don't like" decision - surely not acceptable?
 
D

Denis

#9
The only auditors that quote the relevant section of a standard are our notified body.

I find the quality of Customer and Internal auditors to be very poor.

Many auditors raise "non conformities" based on the differences between their "good" system and the fact that we are different "non conforming or different".

Paul - could you share with us the "non conformities".
 
A

andygr

#10
I find that the way to deal with this issue is first require any finding to state the requirements and the source.
The age old question of "where is that called out".
Next step would then to be ensure that there is a common understanding of what is stated then how it is required ( contract flow down, print , spec, internal system, ect).

At this point it is usualy clear if it is a condition of noncompliance or not. After all how do you truely fix something you do not understand.

The other thing is for individuals issuing a finding there is usualy a reporting structure above them if you find that you agree to disagree.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Marc Your opinion on upgrading to Xenforo 2.2 Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 5
J Your opinion on the better training org for IATF16949 Internal auditor and Lead Auditor IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
M Seeking opinion for ISO14001 team activity ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
L Internal Audit Nonconformances - Your opinion? Internal Auditing 8
M Reducing Cost of Poor Quality - Your opinion requested Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 14
D I need the advice/opinion from a J-STD expert Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
P Scope of a TS 16949 Audit (Non-Automotive Products) - What?s your opinion? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
J Help I need your opinion on a News Letter Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 15
K Risk Assessment / FMEA - Using the same Risk Opportunities - Opinion Question AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
J0anne QPulse 5 - QMS - Software Opinion and help Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 11
Sidney Vianna ANAB Stakeholders Survey - Your opportunity to voice your opinion ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 3
M Objections to ISO standards as harmonised standards in the EU - What's your opinion? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
E What's your opinion on the regulatory requirements of Mexico? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 3
J Methodology to Improve Productivity using SMED & TPM - Experts opinion about it. Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
G Arizona State University BB Certification course: Seeking opinion on value for cost Professional Certifications and Degrees 8
E Opinion needed for Paint Department Job Requirements Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 3
bio_subbu SCENIHR adopts opinion on reprocessing Single Use Devices (SUD) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
P Commute and Cars Opinion Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 17
D Electronic Gauge Measuring Various Heights and Lengths - Your Opinion On our problem Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
L FDA's opinion about a certain technology 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
M Type 1 Gage Study - What's your opinion on this gage? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
H Seeking opinion on Control of Manufacturing of Medical Devices (Printers) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2
J Requests for private comments via PM - What's your opinion? Elsmar Cove Forum ToS and Forum Policies 27
J Quality manual needs your expert opinion ! Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
S Minor nonconformance seems more opinion ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
Crusader Hosting Japanese Business Visitors - Need the Cove members advice / opinion Travel - Hotels, Motels, Planes and Trains 43
C Need opinion to keep alive candidacy - Position hiring placed on Hold Career and Occupation Discussions 12
Geoff Cotton NWA (Northwest Analytical, Inc.) SPC software - Your Opinion, Review and Experiences Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
Z Supplier Manual - Yes or No? What is your opinion of a Supplier Manual? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 20
C Which ASQ Certifications to Seek - Seeking opinion on certifications from ASQ ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 12
D Why MIL-STD-105E is obsoleted but ANSI/ASQC Z1.4 is still implemented? Need Opinion Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 14
M The Perfect QMS: One without a Quality Manager? (your opinion wanted!) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 58
K Opinion of GMP/ISO Quality Audit Manual for Healthcare Manufacturer Hospitals, Clinics & other Health Care Providers 4
F Process Error or Human Error? Your opinion, please Nonconformance and Corrective Action 19
K Opinion: Online Lead Auditor Training? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 29
C Sampling - Skip Lot - 20 ppm - What is your opinion of Skip Lot sampling? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 6
Marc Who is currently getting HDTV broadcasts? Your opinion? After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 38
W Get MBA? Opinion requested Professional Certifications and Degrees 9
K Opinion on Radiological Aspects - Nuclear power generating EMS Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 5
Antonio Vieira As/nzs 4581:1999 - What's your opinion about it? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
J Dizzy of ROOT cause again - Maybe nonsense - Your Opinion? Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 4
H Auditor Opinion and consistency - Each auditor has different 'opinions' ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
B Writing ISO 9001:2000 Procedures - Seeking trained opinion on my procedures ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
N I need your opinion about budget answer Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
J I need your opinion / feedback on my process map Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 23
B CCCF - China Approval Agency - Difference of Opinion Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 9
S Your Opinion: What are the Benefits of ISO implementation? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
M MDR - eIFU - When you can supply an electronic IFU instead of a paper IFU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
John Predmore Configuration Management as a process instead of a procedure AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom