T
TaguchiNovice
Hi All,
I am trying to optimize a system using Taguchi's Signal-to-Noise ratios. This is a larger-the-better kind of optimization and it involves 2 response variables that need to be optimized at the same time - i.e. I want to maximize the value of both these response variables at the same time using the same experiment.
Now, this presents a problem because in many situations, choosing one level of a control factor in my experiment might maximize one of the response variables, but choosing another level of the same factor will maximize the other response variable. In that situation, it is unclear to me as to which factor level should be chosen.
The way I have thought of resolving this is to use an equation that combines the 2 response variables, and weights are attached to each response variable in the equation representing the value of the 2 variables to me.
For instance, if R1 and R2 are the 2 response variables, and if the R1 variable is thrice as important to me as the R2 variable, then instead of trying to maximize R1 or R2 separately, I would maximize the equation 3R1 + R2.
So, in this case, I will find out the value of this equation 3R1 + R2 for each of my test cells and then use the standard Larger-is-Better Signal to Noise Ratio to find out which factor levels will maximize the value of this equation for me and at the same time will minimize noise.
My question is - is this a statistically valid way of approaching the issue? Is there a better way of doing this?
I am trying to optimize a system using Taguchi's Signal-to-Noise ratios. This is a larger-the-better kind of optimization and it involves 2 response variables that need to be optimized at the same time - i.e. I want to maximize the value of both these response variables at the same time using the same experiment.
Now, this presents a problem because in many situations, choosing one level of a control factor in my experiment might maximize one of the response variables, but choosing another level of the same factor will maximize the other response variable. In that situation, it is unclear to me as to which factor level should be chosen.
The way I have thought of resolving this is to use an equation that combines the 2 response variables, and weights are attached to each response variable in the equation representing the value of the 2 variables to me.
For instance, if R1 and R2 are the 2 response variables, and if the R1 variable is thrice as important to me as the R2 variable, then instead of trying to maximize R1 or R2 separately, I would maximize the equation 3R1 + R2.
So, in this case, I will find out the value of this equation 3R1 + R2 for each of my test cells and then use the standard Larger-is-Better Signal to Noise Ratio to find out which factor levels will maximize the value of this equation for me and at the same time will minimize noise.
My question is - is this a statistically valid way of approaching the issue? Is there a better way of doing this?