Outsource of Internal Quality Audits and Incentive for Auditor

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#11
Markasmith said:
...If you wish to give the internal auditors incentive give them incentive for finding areas that need improvement and drive continuous improvement...
Right - positive reinforcement. FWIW - the only incentive our internal auditors get is the joy of working for me, instead of their regular boss, for a day or two. :rolleyes: I jest, but seriously, the machinist gets to get off of his machine and do something else - and he audits the MGT/Business Planning stuff. The accounts receivables gal gets to get out of her cubby in the front office, and because she audits the shop floor / product realization stuff, she gets to wear jeans for the day. :D

Because their audit assignments are in areas that they don't normally tread day-to-day, they find it very interesting and a break from their norm, rather than extra work. I'll add that I keep things very simple and that they do not audit to the standard. They audit our practices against our system (internal procedures, work instructions, etc.). I, and the registrar auditor, verify that our system is compliant with the standard.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Randy

Super Moderator
#12
AllanJ said:
2. If you want someone who can help you to improve your processes, look for someone with experience. So-called qualifications, such as those of RAB, are of little importance, and are not necessary.
DUH!! The so called qualifications (do you not have one?) require experience to obtain, especially the RAB ones. I'm no great lover of the RAB, but they don't award a Lead Auditor cert to some clod just because he can pass a test and pay the fee.

Your understanding of the auditing process and a couple of other nice things also appears to be flawed. Have you ever heard of the word "compentency"? The competence of an auditor has to be verifiable as with anyone else within a management system, so using a "so-called" qualified auditor can help overcome that barrier. As a "so-called" qualified auditor I have hammered (just stating the facts here) the internal audit programs of organizations because they could not verify or provide evidence that their auditors knew krap or could audit.

In reference to the above the following RAB certification doesn't count

SAYLE, SYDNEY SUE LAVER
6794 CORRIGAN DRIVE
BRIGHTON, MI 48116 US

Grade: QMS-LA
Certification: Q03883 Date Certified: 1994-12-23 Expiration: 2004-12-23
Available for hire: Y

FOE: Automotive, Truck, Off-Road Vehicle
FOE: Business, Professional, Personal Services
FOE: Distribution; Wholesale, Retail
FOE: Finance, Insurance, Real Estate
FOE: Health, Medical Services
FOE: Public Administration Services


I sure hope you don't get into trouble for saying that this persons qualification isn't important! :D
 
Last edited:
R

Rockanna

#13
Internal Auditors versus External Auditors

My question is "why would you want to spend the extra money?"
What is the overall benefit for the company?

Our company, like many others, expects you to do more than just what you have on your plate every day. Internal auditors learn so much about the company and the interactions between the various departments; it also pushes them beyond the day to day. So folks just don't fit; on the other hand, some folks make great auditors, very thorough and detail oriented.

What's the pay back? :confused:
 
M

mjflkitty

#14
Markasmith said:
Cari,
I agree and here is my thoughts for what they are worth. If you wish to give the internal auditors incentive give them incentive for finding areas that need improvement and drive continuous improvement. I believe that is the biggest benefit of an audit. Besides it is better by far for an internal auditor to find an issue or potential issue than for the registrar imo.

Mark
I think it will be hard to give incentive base on improvements they will see. does it mean i have to count how many improvements they will be presenting, correct me if i'm wrong. example they will be presenting improvements, so how will be the criteria for this one. Because i really don't know how to deal with this one. the bottome line why we give incentive to our auditor is this is an extra task on them and besides we want to enourage them also and give extra credit for their effort.

Help me please. I really don't know what criteria wud be fair to both side.

Thank you
 
Q

qualitytrec

#15
mjflkitty said:
I think it will be hard to give incentive base on improvements they will see. does it mean i have to count how many improvements they will be presenting, correct me if i'm wrong. example they will be presenting improvements, so how will be the criteria for this one. Because i really don't know how to deal with this one. the bottome line why we give incentive to our auditor is this is an extra task on them and besides we want to enourage them also and give extra credit for their effort.

Help me please. I really don't know what criteria wud be fair to both side.

Thank you
mjflkitty,
Well I do not have an incentive program, but if I did it would be based on what is found that can be improved and benefit the systems, processes, product or safety. Before they are implemented they would obviously have to be reviewed by the management and agreed to that it would be an improvment not just an addition.
I would not base incentive on how many are presented but on how many prove to be effective. If they are effective improvements it should translate into $$ for the company thus the reason for the incentive.
When I worked at Intier there was a guy who kept bringing in tools that he made at home that helped him assemble the insrument panels. When they saw it improved the system he got $50.00 a shot( he was not an auditor ). guess what. Others on the line started tring to find a way to get things flowing smoother too.

These are just what I would do if I had an incentive program.

My boss holds his wallet to close for us to do this here. I mentioned incentives for ideas that payoff and for efficiency gains and he said "they get a paycheck don't they? If thats not enough incentive they can go some where else." not many are happy working here and nobody gives ideas anymore. When we have a new hire they are excited for about a month because like the rest of us they see potential. But they get squashed too. :nopity:
I know I whine a lot and I appologize. I will try to be more possitive.

Mark
 

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#16
mjflkitty said:
I think it will be hard to give incentive base on improvements they will see. does it mean i have to count how many improvements they will be presenting, correct me if i'm wrong. example they will be presenting improvements, so how will be the criteria for this one. Because i really don't know how to deal with this one. the bottome line why we give incentive to our auditor is this is an extra task on them and besides we want to enourage them also and give extra credit for their effort.
Maybe because I still actually enjoy (for the most part) my job, but is not just the idea to find ways to improve incentive enough? Why must $$$ come into this? Society's attitude is so highly "what's-in-it-for-me?" now. Whatever happened to doing a good job for the sake of doing a good job? Pride in one's work? Self-worth?

Are all of my Internal Auditors happy when it comes time to do an audit? No. Because it usually means they have to readjust their normal job schedule to accomodate the audit. However, once they start auditing, they're actually happy to be there. It's a change-of-pace from their normal job. They get away from their usual area (be it a lab or a desk) and get to talk to people they would not normally talk to and get to see other aspects of the business. They learn how others impact their job and how their own job impacts others. They see the tools and methodologies used at their own desk used in other areas perhaps in a different (and more effective) manner - and if less effective, they put forth an Opportunity for Improvement to have the auditee come and see their area.

Having a financial incentive for audits has me fearing that your audits will have lots of findings with little value. We have performance incentive program where I work for production based activities and how well departments have adopted some of the methodolgies. If you have a $$$ system for audits, everyone will want to be an auditor, but do no value-added work and that defeats the purpose of an audit.

I strongly urge you to not implement a financial incentive for your Internal Auditor, mjflkitty! The auditors should feel as if they want to help improve the company.
 
A

AllanJ

#17
Randy said:
DUH!! The so called qualifications (do you not have one?) require experience to obtain, especially the RAB ones. I'm no great lover of the RAB, but they don't award a Lead Auditor cert to some clod just because he can pass a test and pay the fee.

Your understanding of the auditing process and a couple of other nice things also appears to be flawed. Have you ever heard of the word "compentency"? The competence of an auditor has to be verifiable as with anyone else within a management system, so using a "so-called" qualified auditor can help overcome that barrier. As a "so-called" qualified auditor I have hammered (just stating the facts here) the internal audit programs of organizations because they could not verify or provide evidence that their auditors knew krap or could audit.

In reference to the above the following RAB certification doesn't count

SAYLE, SYDNEY SUE LAVER
6794 CORRIGAN DRIVE
BRIGHTON, MI 48116 US

Grade: QMS-LA
Certification: Q03883 Date Certified: 1994-12-23 Expiration: 2004-12-23
Available for hire: Y

FOE: Automotive, Truck, Off-Road Vehicle
FOE: Business, Professional, Personal Services
FOE: Distribution; Wholesale, Retail
FOE: Finance, Insurance, Real Estate
FOE: Health, Medical Services
FOE: Public Administration Services


I sure hope you don't get into trouble for saying that this persons qualification isn't important! :D
Ah! At the end of a busy day, helping clients clean up problems left by incopmpetent auditors, it is so nice to have something to laugh about. Thank you, Randy.

Yes, I have indeed heard about "competence" - I have written about the subject, in fact. It is the "demonstrated ability" to actually perform an assigned task. To my knowledge, the RAB, as is the case for other present day certifiers of auditors, makes no attempt to actually witness an auditor preparing, performing or reporting an audit. That is they make no attempt to watch an auditor "demonstrate" he/she can actaually audit. Nor do they aver a "certified auditor" is necessarily experienced in particular processes. The certificate actually only means they believe the person should be able to prepare, perform and report an audit. The person's actual auditing expereince is based on references. Of course, the dirty little secret is that there is very little verification of the standard of auditing achieved and many references are on the basis of buddy and crony sign-offs - especially when relating to internal auditing experiences.

So, does an RAB or similar auditor certificate infer competence for the particular audit? Well, one needs to consider all of the (common) horror stories about registrars. One needs to ask which certified auditors involved in the BF tire deaths and were "struck off". And one has to examine one's personal experience of looking at the outcome of so many "audits" performed by "certified auditors". They certainly do exhibit the traits of "clods who passed a test and paid a fee."

If one wants to engage an outside auditor, which is the original point of this thread, you need one who is au fait with the technology etc if they are to add value as distinct from performing the typical "docs and stickers" audits.

I have observed far too many trained and certified auditors who cannot effectively audit a process - only do nit pick jobs - as they really do not understand what it is the auditee is doing. Equally well, I have observed a considerable number of people who are terrific auditors who lack substantial training and possess no certification. Regardless of what training has been given, when it comes to competence, I prefer the Missouri wisdom.

As to my wife's views about my views, they are, as is said, a matter for Randy to speculate upon and for me to know. She is indeed flattered to note his interest and the free publicity he provides by reproducing them in the illustrious Cove, but they are not germane to the original question raised in this thread.

Oh yes, Randy, I was first "certified" as an auditor in 1977, having been doing them for several years. That was for auditing to ANSI N45.2 and associated standards for the Nuclear Industry. :D And, my audit training course was one of the first group of four such registered by the IQA back in 1984 when that body started the first scheme for "certifying" audit courses and auditors - long before the RAB was even a twinkle in the ASQ's eyes. I removed my course from that scheme in 1990-1991 as I felt its evolved requirements required people to be trained inadequately: my approach, rejected by that body back then when the original ISO 9K had not long been released, is now known as the "process approach". Since it is now the adopted approach, I suppose there must be some people around the world who reckon I do know something about the audit process. Happily, none of my clients have cared since I first started as a consultant, in 1983, whether or not I was "certified" but as they still occasionally come back to me (some after twenty years of so of association), I guess they must feel I know something about the audit "process". I prefer their certificates - repeat business, promptly paid invoices and kind letters of commendation.

Have a nice day and let's enjoy a six pack together some time.
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#18
Allan I love you and your sense of humor. You have proven yourself in my eyes to be a gentleman who can laugh and have fun :applause: I'm sure you had a chuckle or two with my previous entry.

If the opportunity ever presents itself I'll definitely not shy away from sharing a brew.
 
M

mjflkitty

#19
Thank you

Hi Everyone!

Thank you for giving me an idea that I would consider our objective as one of the basis for giving our auditors incentive

Thank you, Thank you Thank you :bigwave: :thanx: :thanx:
 
E

encee98

#20
Hello mjflkitty,

The discussion had me thinking of outsourcing internal audits for some of the firms I'm assisting. I'm currently looking into how this can be integrated into their established system.

If you don't mind my asking, may I know where you are based? I'm in Iloilo City in Western Visayas.

Best regards. :bigwave:
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
F Is it good to outsource the Internal Audits? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 16
D Could an organisation outsource all Part M activities? EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 0
B Outsource Production Line need ISO13485 Certificate ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
R Change in Direction - Management decides to Outsource Manufacturing Operations ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
J Scope of Registration ? Design Responsible ? Outsource Design??? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D How to Audit Outsource process (New Trainee Auditor) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
L Question: outsource medical device electric safety test to OEM supplier ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
D Does waste water equipment need calibration if we also outsource testing? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 12
S Definition Outsource - Outsourcing - Subcontracting - Definition - TS 16949 and ISO 9001 Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 14
Howard Atkins If you outsource production can you register to ISO/TS 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D Medical Device Directive manufacturer - Wanting to outsource some proceses ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 27
E Outsource Management Representative? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 15
G Does Outsource of Processes refer to things like heat treat of the product? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 5
Q ISO 9001-2015 Internal audit finding Internal Auditing 12
lanley liao How to understand this words that the planning of internal audit shall take into consideration the results of previous audits? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 10
A Add MDSAP to Internal Audit Schedule Medical Device Related Regulations 0
J IATF 16949 Internal Audit question - Auditor's responsibility Internal Auditing 6
M ISO13485:2016, MDSAP and Internal Audits ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
S IATF 16949 Internal Audit Example IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
R AS9100D internal audit checklist or ISO 9001 2015 to AS9100 D AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Would this be a second site for the purposes of internal and third party audits? General Auditing Discussions 4
V Internal Auditor Competency KPI IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 14
J ISMS - Internal Audits Internal Auditing 3
M ISO 13485:2016 internal audit checklist Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 5
S ISO 9001:2015 Internal Auditing Internal Auditing 8
A Internal Audit Questions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
L Documented Information in Internal Audits Process (9.2) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
salaheddine96 Internal audit planning Internal Auditing 2
D CB and customer audits considered as internal audits? General Auditing Discussions 9
M ISO 9001 Major Nonconformance Internal Audit Schedule/COVID-19 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 18
E MDR internal audit Internal Auditing 1
B Internal Auditor Competency - Product Auditors Internal Auditing 9
U Internal Auditor not trained but done Audit for some process Nonconformance and Corrective Action 5
F Internal transfer of work from one line to another? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
B Looking for 10 Internal Audit Online Training Participants ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
R Monitor production quality - Internal KPIs Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
R IATF 16949 - Outsourcing of internal audits Internal Auditing 10
M Major vs. Minor for Internal Audits? Internal Auditing 10
T Internal Nonconformance procedure thoughts (AS9100) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
M Tips on preparing for IATF 16949 Internal Lead Auditor exam Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
C Internal Audits in a tiny Dx Company Internal Auditing 33
H AS9100 Checklist for Internal Audit needed AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 7
F Internal Audit before Pre-Assessment ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
Q Internal audit plan template Internal Auditing 12
E PEMS Hazards - IEC 60601 Clause 14.6 - Internal data use - Pressure sensor IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
L Internal audit during COVID-19 restrictions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
A QMS Overhaul - Reorganizing and Renaming Documents - Internal References Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
N Sampling Plan for Internal Audits - ISO 2859 or 3951 - Or Neither? Internal Auditing 6
O ISO13485 implementation - Are internal audits expected before stage 1 audit? Design and Development of Products and Processes 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom