he following finding was picked up by the Third party auditor during an
> ISO9001:2000 recertification and TS16949 surveillance audit:
>
> The calibration of Karl Fischer water titrator is outsourced to Allometrics
> Inc. which is ISO9001 and ISO 17025 certified but is not certified to
> calibrate titrators- as defined by the scope of the certificate. The Karl
> Fischer apparatus is not used for OEM testing neither is it defined in the
> Control Plan. This is being used to verify a crackle test.
>
> Would this be a finding against ISO9001:2000 or TS16949? From my standpoint,
> this finding is not valid because by ISO standard the requirement is for
> outsourced service organization to be ISO9001 only, not ISO17025 as required
> by TS. Appreciate your feedback
> ISO9001:2000 recertification and TS16949 surveillance audit:
>
> The calibration of Karl Fischer water titrator is outsourced to Allometrics
> Inc. which is ISO9001 and ISO 17025 certified but is not certified to
> calibrate titrators- as defined by the scope of the certificate. The Karl
> Fischer apparatus is not used for OEM testing neither is it defined in the
> Control Plan. This is being used to verify a crackle test.
>
> Would this be a finding against ISO9001:2000 or TS16949? From my standpoint,
> this finding is not valid because by ISO standard the requirement is for
> outsourced service organization to be ISO9001 only, not ISO17025 as required
> by TS. Appreciate your feedback